ABC Deck #697974 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 25/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox, Fusion
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Illegal. 1 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Fusion or Xyz boss (ABC-Dragon Buster, A-to-Z-Dragon Buster Cannon, Ojama King, Divine Arsenal AA-ZEUS) backed by Ojama zone-lock and token pressure; Ojama token chip damage (300 per token destroyed) and Armed Dragon / Pile Armed Dragon board presence
• Turn 1 (going first): Normal Summon Ojama Red or Ojama Green, search the Ojama Trio or Ojamagic line, and build toward a Fusion or Xyz boss; the list has no verified starter-to-boss route in the evidence
• Turn 2 (going second): Use Ojama Trio or Ojama Duo tokens and Dark Ruler No More to blunt the opponent's board, then rebuild through Ojama Country and Ojamatch recursion; the deck has no side deck to adjust
• Recovery: Recycle Ojama monsters from the GY through Ojama Country and Ojamatch, and redeploy Armed Dragon Thunder LV3 and Pile Armed Dragon for card advantage (Inferred)
• After siding: None: side deck is 0 cards, so there is no post-side plan

Why it scores here

This list is illegal in OCG: it runs 3 copies of Super Polymerization against a limit of 2, so it does not receive a normal Final Contextual score and the score is capped at 25 as a theoretical, structural-only read. The 40-card main and 15-card Extra Deck are within size limits, but the deck spreads across five archetype fragments (Ojama 20, generic 18, ABC 9, Armed Dragon 6, Spright and Venom 1 each), so the engine is only partly coherent. Its main draw is the Ojama token and recursion package with a 0.78 chance of at least one searcher in the opening hand (Inferred), but the 1-of Ojama Green, Yellow and Black and the single-copy Fusion and Xyz bosses carry real brick risk. There are no recorded boards, no tournament data and no side deck, so floor, median and ceiling are all weak, and the structural score of about 40 rests on text reading and probability estimates rather than observed results. The score was not produced by averaging card scores or by the archetype's usage stats.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange primary, no secondary weighting applied. Structural ≈ 40, Going First ≈ 38, Going Second ≈ 33, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 35. Modifiers: Illegal copy limit (Super Polymerization 3 copies vs 2) (-4); Engine conflicts across five archetype fragments (-3); No side deck (-2); Illegal cap applied (-5). Final formula: No reliable metagame: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers = 0.80*40 + 0.20*35 - 9 = 30, then capped at 25 because the list is Illegal (theoretical/structural-only read)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.78 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Ojama token and recursion package gives board presence and GY redundancy
• Several strong Fusion and Xyz bosses (ABC-Dragon Buster, A-to-Z-Dragon Buster Cannon, Ojama King)
• Searcher density is high (10 texts, 0.78 at least one in 6 cards)

Weaknesses

• Illegal in OCG: Super Polymerization over the copy limit
• Five archetype fragments reduce engine coherence
• No side deck, so no post-side plan
• No hand traps or floodgates, so limited interaction against a going-second opponent
• Many 1-of partner cards (Ojama Green, Yellow, Black) with brick risk

Critical choke points

• Reaching a Fusion or Xyz boss depends on a few 1-of Machine and LIGHT pieces (ABC-Dragon Buster line, X-Head Cannon, Z-Metal Tank)
• Super Polymerization is the main Fusion route and is itself over the limit

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality: Super Polymerization 3 copies vs Semi-Limited limit 2 (Illegal); Main 40 and Extra 15 are within OCG size rules; Side 0 is within the 0 to 15 range; Archetype spread and copy histogram from composition; Hypergeometric draw probabilities from probabilities block; Card stats and banlist status for each listed card
• Inferred: Starter and brick estimates from probabilities and card text; Strategy classification as Midrange with Toolbox secondary; Structural scores D1 to D14 and the weight-profile calculation; Going-first and going-second plan descriptions
• Provisional: Meta Power is null and D13 matchup fit is provisional (no dated metagame sample or tournament link)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied, so combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link, so archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record are absent No win-rate telemetry for going-first, going-second, matchup or brick rates Meta Power is provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied Deck title is null, so the deck is identified only by id and archetype