Spell
NormalOjamagic
Archetype:
Ojama
View:
5190
If this card is sent from the hand or field to the GY: Add 1 each of "Ojama Green", "Ojama Yellow" and "Ojama Black" from your Deck to your hand.
50± 8/ 100
Power Score
Intrinsic
49
Deck
51
Ojamagic — Power Evaluation
Final Score: 50 ± 8 · Confidence: Medium
- Intrinsic: 49 · Deck: 51 · Meta: provisional
- Primary role: Searcher/Tutor · Secondary: Recovery/Recursion
Why it scores here
Ojamagic tutors three core Ojama pieces (Green, Yellow, Black) on a GY-send trigger, delivering strong card advantage (+3 to hand) in archetype-focused builds. However, it requires setup to trigger and sees limited use outside Ojama decks where the trio is run; its pure tutor role and lack of interactive effects cap its power tier despite solid archetype inclusion.
Axis scores
| Axis | Score | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Accessibility | 55 | Requires GY-send trigger to function, limiting live routes to decks with reliable discard/mill outlets; Ojama lists have multiple triggers but setup is still needed (Observed) |
| Combo & Conversion | 50 | Text implies +3 card advantage on trigger that should enable board development, but no combo data provided to verify trigger accessibility or board quality in practice (Inferred) |
| Resource Economy | 70 | Adds 3 cards to hand on resolution, generating significant card advantage; actual economy depends on the GY-send trigger cost (Verified) |
| Effect & Interaction | 0 | Pure search/tutoring with no negation, removal, or opponent interaction; no disruption or defense (Verified) |
| Material Utility | 5 | Normal Spell with no ATK/DEF and no material utility; resolves to GY with no lingering presence (Verified) |
| Resilience & Flexibility | 30 | One-shot effect with no recovery or multi-turn persistence; negation before trigger or graveyard lockdown ends the line (Observed) |
| Deck-Building Efficiency | 65 | Archetype-specific tutor (only useful in decks running Green/Yellow/Black); 100% inclusion in pure Ojama but thin (≤12%) outside core archetype (Observed) |
Calculation
Weight profile: 0.7 Searcher/Tutor + 0.3 Recovery/Recursion. Intrinsic ≈ 49, Deck ≈ 51, Meta = provisional. Modifiers: none. Final formula: 0.40*Intrinsic + 0.60*Deck
Strengths
- Tutors three core Ojama pieces with a single trigger
- 100% inclusion in pure Ojama (archetype-specific efficiency)
- Generates +3 card advantage on trigger
- Two trigger routes (hand or field) provide flexibility
Weaknesses
- Requires GY-send trigger; not live on hand or field
- Archetype-specific tutor (only works with Green/Yellow/Black)
- Thin inclusion outside Ojama (max 12.4% in Armed Dragon)
- No opponent interaction; pure draw/search
- One-shot effect with no recovery or multi-turn value
Counters / choke points
- Negation before GY-send (Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring on triggering discard)
- Graveyard lockdown effects
- Decks that do not run the Ojama trio find no use for the tutor
Best use
Searcher/Recovery engine. Decks: Ojama (core), Armed Dragon (tech), Yummy (tech). Suggested copies: 2.
Evidence & gaps
- Verified: Card text tutors Ojama Green, Ojama Yellow, Ojama Black from Deck on GY-send trigger; Appears in 298 decks, 100% in main deck; Runs at average 2.06 copies per deck (max 3); 100% inclusion in Ojama archetype (usage statistics); Ojama Green/Yellow/Black co-deck 99%/98.7%/98.7%
- Observed: Deck inclusion across 40 distinct archetypes; 32.2% of decks are primary Ojama home; 12.4% Armed Dragon, ≤5% in other archetypes; High archetype-specific inclusion (100% in pure Ojama) suggests strong deck fit
- Inferred: GY-send trigger enables +3 card advantage (from card text); Tutor search is functional in all decks running the trio; Combo conversion likely strong in well-built Ojama lines (+3 tutoring); GY-send is accessible in Ojama due to multiple discard/mill outlets
- Data gaps: No combos supplied — combo conversion is text-only inference; cannot verify trigger accessibility or board quality No guides supplied — missing human context on optimal play lines No banlist token — assumed 3 copies unlimited No top-card ranking — suggests not meta-relevant at top play level Thin evidence in 35 of 40 archetypes (only 6 have >2% inclusion) No deck-level board outcome data (what happens after tutor resolves)