Tellarknight Deck #43913 — Yu-Gi-Oh! TCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 59/100 (±12 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: none
• Format: tcg

Legality

Main 45 / Extra 20 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 3 violation(s). Restricted cards run: Dimension Shifter (), Abyss Dweller ().

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Rank 4 Tellarknight/Constellar Xyz plays to assemble and use boss monsters like Stellarknight Constellar Diamond / Constellar Ptolemy M7
• Turn 1 (going first): T1–T2 assemble key Constellar/ Tellarknight Xyz (Ptolemaeus, Diamond, Omega, Delteros) and apply continuous boss presence with denial via Dimension Shifter, Sakitama, and Dark Ruler No More
• Turn 2 (going second): Six-card hand aims to find Seer/ Castor/ Ptolemaeus to build the engine; leverage hand traps and counter negation to survive and reach turn 2–3 Xyz setup
• Recovery: Return-to-hand recursion via Aratama, Sakitama, and Constellar Ptolemaeus; reuse of Dimension Shifter and Dark Ruler No More for ongoing disruption
• After siding: Not evaluated — no post-side data supplied

Why it scores here

The deck is a Combo build that can assemble a strong Xyz board but is severely constrained by legality issues and a heavy reliance on specific Level 4 enablers. Its consistency is limited by brick risk and an over-dense engine, keeping T1–T2 impact moderate; disruption exists but is narrow, and the lack of key staples plus an Illegal status cap the floor and ceiling alike. Post-side adaptability is very low without defined side inputs.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Balanced (combo primary). Structural ≈ 59, Going First ≈ 55, Going Second ≈ 50, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 45. Modifiers: Illegal status (Forbidden cards) (-10); Missing key Constellar enablers (-8); Extra deck overcommitment (-5); No side deck plan (-4); Brick risk from dense engine (-3). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ — · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.5 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex 60, median 50, board-per-starter 2.3
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Strong Xyz toolbox with Ptolemaeus/Diamond/Omega/Delteros lines
• Multiple hand traps and negation tools for disruption
• Boss monsters provide credible end-game threats

Weaknesses

• Illegal status with Forbidden and over-limited cards
• High brick probability (~49.6%) on T1
• Over-reliance on specific Level 4 enablers
• No defined side deck plan
• Narrow disruption window after T2

Critical choke points

• Dependence on specific Level 4 monsters for Xyz access
• No reliable T1 disruption against backrow
• Missing dedicated board-breaker

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: legality status; Extra Deck breakdown; hand trap count; negation text presence
• Observed: combo best line power index; median power index; archetype purity %; exact card copies run
• Inferred: opening hand probabilities; brick estimate; T1 consistency; disruption reach; post-side adaptability
• Provisional: meta power; matchup outcomes; format fit without dated meta
• Data gaps: no win-rate telemetry or matchup results no post-side performance data no detailed combo steps or FTK lines