@Ignister Deck Breakdown

@Ignister — Archetype Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Archetype Power: 29/100 (±9 · Tier: Weak / shell-only (format-illegal) · Confidence: Low)

• Evaluation mode: full ecosystem
• Format: tcg

Why it scores here

@Ignister scores 29 ± 9 (Low confidence). Structural power is about 34: the archetype's own pool is thin (4 direct cards), it has no combo routes or pure build, its core is restricted, and every variant is illegal. The best deck-evaluation variant (67) is discounted because it is illegal. The score is not an average of card scores and does not rest on the single best deck. It reflects a Link-based Cyberse and Maliss ecosystem that uses the @Ignister name as a thin identity. Meta is provisional and no dated sample exists.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Weight profile: full ecosystem. Structural ≈ 34, Best variant ≈ 67, Avg competitive ≈ 38, Meta = provisional. Modifiers: All variants Illegal (-6); Restricted core cards (-4); Thin direct archetype pool (-2). Final formula: 0.65*Structural + 0.20*BestVariant + 0.15*AvgCompetitiveVariant (Meta provisional) + ContextModifiers(-12) = 0.65*34 + 0.20*67 + 0.15*38 - 12 = 29.2 Double-counting audit: Starter density is scored only in A2 and not repeated in A4 or A6. Hand-trap and negate interaction is scored once in A9/A11/A12, not counted again as pool quality. Restricted-card exposure is in A15 and the modifiers, not in A1. Best variant (67) is reported separately from the structural score and given 20% weight. Generic Cyberse and Maliss staples do not raise A1. Popularity or variant count did not add points.

Strengths

• Four real @Ignister cards with a Link identity
• Large generic Cyberse and Maliss support base lets many variants run
• Multiple hand-traps and negates give interaction on both going-first and going-second

Weaknesses

• All 30 variants are Illegal in the format, so no legal variant exists to score normally
• No pure build (0 of 30; mean in-family purity 7.1%)
• No combo routes supplied; combo ecosystem is text-only inference
• Core cards are restricted (Ash Blossom 2 copies, Druiswurm, Magnamhut, Terraforming, Maliss in Underground)

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: All 30 variants have legality status Illegal; Only 4 cards carry Card.Archetype = @Ignister; Core restricted cards include Ash Blossom (2), Bystial Druiswurm, Bystial Magnamhut, Maliss in Underground, Terraforming; Zero combos supplied across all variants
• Observed: Deck-evaluation scores range 20–67 (median 30, average 38), with a deck-level average structural power of 52.3; In-family purity averages 7.1%; 0 pure and 0 hybrid variants
• Inferred: Starter access is real but largely generic (Maliss and Bystial searchers, Backup and Wizard @Ignister); Going-first and going-second quality sits in the mid range from deck-evaluation averages (48.5 / 53.9); Resilience comes from multiple hand-traps and negates, which are mostly generic
• Provisional: Meta adaptability (A14): no tournament link and no archetype meta-share
• Speculation: Future support scalability (A16) depends on unannounced @Ignister or Cyberse cards
• Data gaps: All variants Illegal: the legality check may be stale or the list may carry banned cards; a normal legal-variant score cannot be produced until this is confirmed No combos supplied across any variant; combo ecosystem is text-only inference No tournament link; archetype meta-share absent; A14 and Meta are provisional Archetype membership comes from Card.Archetype only; @Ignister has 4 direct cards and no related support cards Deck-evaluation per-variant data is incomplete (some going-first and going-second values are 0) No win-rate telemetry exists in YGOVN