Purrely Deck #775156 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 35/100 (±10 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Combo
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 49 / Extra 17 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 4 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Xyz Summon Purrely Xyz monsters (Epurrely/Expurrely) and convert board presence into direct attacks or removal through Xyz effects; Link and Fusion finishers (Perfectron Hydradrive Dragon, Radiant Typhoon Varuroon, El Shaddoll Apkallone) once the board is stable
• Turn 1 (going first): Open with Purrely or Purrelyly (or a searcher) to add a Purrely Quick-Play Spell, then Xyz Summon an Epurrely or Expurrely from the Extra Deck while holding Purrelyeap!? or Ash Blossom for protection
• Turn 2 (going second): Hand trap (Ash Blossom, Droll & Lock Bird, Maxx C, Red Reboot) to disrupt the opponent's first board, then recover through Purrely Quick-Play recursion from the GY into an Xyz
• Recovery: Quick-Play Spells recur from the GY through Xyz effects (Epurrely Noir, Epurrely Beauty) and Purrely searchers rebuild the starter each turn
• After siding: Not evaluable: side_count is 0, so there is no post-side plan in the submitted list

Why it scores here

The deck reliably opens a Purrely engine: 23 archetype-core copies give an estimated 0.97 chance of at least one core card in a 5-card opening hand, and 15 searcher-text cards add redundancy (Inferred). Its conversion ceiling comes from Xyz monsters that recur Quick-Play Spells from the graveyard, supported by four hand traps and five negation-text cards that protect the engine and interact with the opponent's first board. The median output cannot be measured because the deck has no recorded boards, so the floor is estimated from text only and carries low confidence. The list is illegal in its current form: Red-Eyes Dark Dragoon is Forbidden, three limited or semi-limited cards exceed their caps, and the Extra Deck holds 17 cards against a 15-card maximum, so the score is capped at 35 and labeled theoretical. Popularity did not earn points; the archetype core is the reason the system scores as it does, and the card scores were not averaged.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange. Structural ≈ 57, Going First ≈ 56, Going Second ≈ 50, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 50. Modifiers: banlist_exposure (-8); weak_post_side_plan (-3). Final formula: No reliable metagame: 0.80*Structural(57) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(50) + ContextModifiers(-11) = 44.6, then capped at 35 because the list is Illegal (theoretical/structural only)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.97 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Large archetype core (23 copies) gives high starter access
• Quick-Play recursion and Xyz effects give resource regeneration
• Four hand traps and five negation-text cards provide layered interaction

Weaknesses

• Illegal copy counts and a Forbidden card in the Extra Deck
• Extra Deck over the 15-card limit
• No side deck, so no post-side adaptation
• Dense Quick-Play dependence raises brick risk and decision load

Critical choke points

• Need a live Purrely Xyz on board before most Quick-Play Spells deliver value
• Forbidden Red-Eyes Dark Dragoon and Limited Chant copies make the list unplayable as submitted

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Illegal status: Red-Eyes Dark Dragoon is Forbidden with 1 copy run; Copy-limit violations: Sleepy Memory 3/2, Radiant Typhoon Chant 3/1; Extra Deck count 17 against a 15-card maximum; Main Deck 49 cards, inside the 40-60 range; Core archetype copies: 23; Side Deck count is 0
• Inferred: At least one core Purrely card in opening hand, roughly 0.97 (hypergeometric); Quick-Play recursion and Xyz effects provide resource regeneration; Hand traps and negation text give interaction across the board; Going-second hand trap probability roughly 0.42
• Provisional: Meta position and matchup fit (no dated metagame sample supplied)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot record are absent No win-rate telemetry exists in YGOVN Meta Power is provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied Deck has no side deck, so post-side performance cannot be assessed