Lunalight Deck #775140 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 30/100 (±8 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Control
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 55 / Extra 12 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 1 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Lunalight Fusion engine (Leo/Liger/Sabre Dancer, 3000-3800 ATK fusion boards) built from Lunalight recursion and Polymerization/Lunalight Fusion; Recursion-driven grind through Lunalight Gold Leo, Yellow Marten and Perfume returns
• Turn 1 (going first): Opening starter (Masquerade, Gold Leo, Kaleido Chick or Silver Hound) searches a Polymerization or Lunalight Fusion, then a Fusion Summon into a Dancer; Ash Blossom and Infinite Impermanence protect the line
• Turn 2 (going second): Hand traps (Ash, Droll & Lock Bird, Effect Veiler, Evenly Matched, Nibiru) disrupt the opponent's board, then a single Fusion or Xyz recovers the board
• Recovery: Recursion from GY via Luna Light Perfume, Yellow Marten and Gold Leo to rebuild the Lunalight monsters needed for the next Fusion
• After siding: No Side Deck is registered (side_count 0), so no post-side plan can be evaluated

Why it scores here

The deck is scored as a system: a 55-card Main with 25 distinct cards, 12 Extra Deck cards, and no Side Deck. Its 25 core Lunalight copies have about a 96% chance of at least one in a 5-card opening hand (Inferred), and it has several recursion and search lines (Gold Leo, Yellow Marten, Perfume, Polymerization, Lunalight Fusion), so it reliably opens a plan. Conversion is plausible because the Lunalight Dancers reach 3000-3800 ATK with double attacks, but no recorded boards exist, so ceiling and median are text-only inference. Interaction is dense (Ash, Impermanence, Evenly Matched, Droll, Veiler, Nibiru, Ghost Mourner), which supports going-second play, but 19 hand-trap and tech cards dilute the engine: exact-name archetype purity is only 38.8% and the off-archetype cards are spread across Artifact, Mulcharmy, Tri-Brigade, Kaiju and Fire Formation. Usage statistics and popularity were not credited as power, and no win rate or meta share exists. The Illegal status (Ash Blossom run 3 times against a limit of 2) is a hard cap: the uncapped contextual figure is 42, and the reported score is capped at 30 with a structural-only read.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 56, Going First ≈ 58, Going Second ≈ 54, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 48. Modifiers: Banlist / copy-limit violation (-6); No Side Deck (-4); Engine dilution (-2); Illegal status cap (-12). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional) = 54 before modifiers; modifiers -12 gives 42; Illegal cap applied, final 30

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.96 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Lunalight recursion and search give a high chance of opening a live engine (Inferred)
• Dense hand-trap and negation package for going second (Inferred)
• Dancer Fusions provide high ATK and double attacks (Verified stats)

Weaknesses

• Illegal copy-limit violation (Ash Blossom x3 vs legal 2)
• No Side Deck, so no post-side adaptability
• Low exact-archetype purity (38.8%) and many off-archetype tech slots
• No recorded combos to confirm ceiling or median

Critical choke points

• The Lunalight Fusion / Polymerization pair: few copies of each, so losing both removes the main Fusion route
• Ash Blossom copy count must drop to 2 before the deck is legal to play

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality: 55 Main, 12 Extra, 0 Side; Ash Blossom run 3 copies against a legal limit of 2; Card text and stats for the 25 distinct Main cards and the 12 Extra cards; Copy histogram 13x3, 4x2, 8x1 (Main) and 8 Fusion, 3 Xyz, 1 Link (Extra); Exact-archetype purity 38.8%
• Observed: Usage statistics show the core Lunalight set is standard (Gold Leo 100%, Wolf 94.8%); no recorded boards
• Inferred: Opening-hand probabilities (hypergeometric); Brick, resilience, recursion and interaction reads from card text; Going-first and going-second estimates; Combo ceiling and median are text-only inference
• Provisional: Meta Power (null) and matchup/format fit (D13); Tournament reliability estimate
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent No win-rate telemetry for going-first/second, matchup, brick or starter rates Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied Deck title is null; scoring uses the deck id and archetype only