Diabellestarr Deck #774594 — Yu-Gi-Oh! TCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 35/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox
• Format: tcg

Legality

Main 56 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Illegal. 4 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Extra Deck Fusion/Synchro boss plays (Azamina, Saint Azamina, Diabellstar the Black Witch, Diabell Queen) enabled by Sinful Spoils and White Forest searches (Inferred from card text); Diabellze the White Witch and Diabellze the Original Sinkeeper as large beaters once the board is established (Inferred)
• Turn 1 (going first): Open Elzette, Silvy and WANTED or Wanted-style searchers to reach Diabellstar or Azamina boss; Ash and Droll only protect the line if the hand holds them (Inferred)
• Turn 2 (going second): Use Ash Blossom x3 and Droll & Lock Bird to stop the opponent's first engine play, then rebuild through the GY-based searchers (Inferred)
• Recovery: Searchers that add monsters from the Deck (Tales of the White Forest, Filia Diabell, Deception of the Sinful Spoils) and GY recursion via Sinful Spoils effects (Inferred)
• After siding: Not evaluable: the deck runs no Side Deck (Verified)

Why it scores here

The deck's structure is a Diabell-family engine built on Sinful Spoils and White Forest searchers that can reach several Fusion and Synchro bosses, and the archetype core is present enough that the engine is usually reachable (P(at least one core card in a 5-card hand) ≈ 0.85, Inferred). Interaction is strong for the format, with three Ash Blossom, Droll & Lock Bird, Harpie's Feather Duster, Lightning Storm and Forbidden Droplet covering hand traps, backrow and boards. The score is held down by the fact that the list is not legal: three cards exceed their copy limits, which caps the evaluation as theoretical and structural only. The deck also spans several sub-archetypes (White Forest, Sinful Spoils, Azamina, Diabell, Diabellstar, Chaos, Phantasm) with no recorded boards, so the combo ceiling and median are text-based inference, not observed output. Popularity and archetype usage were not credited, and no card scores were averaged into the deck score.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 53, Going First ≈ 52, Going Second ≈ 56, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 45. Modifiers: banlist_exposure (-4); engine_conflicts (-3). Final formula: Illegal cap: structural 53, tournament reliability 45; uncapped 0.80*53 + 0.20*45 - 7 modifiers ≈ 45, capped at 35 because the list is illegal; Meta Power provisional (null)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.85 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Strong Extra Deck boss package (Azamina, Saint Azamina, Diabellstar the Black Witch, Diabellze the White Witch)
• Redundant searcher text (20 cards) makes the engine reachable in most opening hands
• Layered interaction: Ash Blossom x3, Droll & Lock Bird, Harpie's Feather Duster, Lightning Storm, Forbidden Droplet

Weaknesses

• Illegal list: three cards over copy limit
• No Side Deck, so no post-side plan
• Sub-archetype sprawl (71 off-archetype copies) weakens engine coherence
• Several usage-core Extra Deck cards are missing (Silvera, Poplar, Chaos Angel, Garura and others)

Critical choke points

• Engine depends on Sinful Spoils and White Forest searchers; a single hand disruption on the searcher can stall the line
• Legality: the copy-limit violations must be corrected before this list is comparable to any other evaluation

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality: 56 main, 15 extra, 0 side; three cards over copy limit (Ash Blossom 3/2, Super Polymerization 3/2, WANTED 3/1); Archetype core present 10 of 25 usage-stat core cards (40%); Card text and stats for all listed cards; Archetype spread: 71 off-archetype copies; exact-name purity 0%
• Inferred: Engine reachability from hypergeometric odds (archetype core ≈ 0.85; searcher ≈ 0.90); Brick and dead-card risk from composition and card text; Interaction quality from negation and removal text counts; Going-first and going-second plans from card text
• Provisional: Matchup and format fit (D13), with no tournament or dated meta data; Meta Power (null)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied; combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link; archetype meta-share and per-pilot record are absent No Side Deck; best-of-3 post-side plan cannot be evaluated No win-rate telemetry; going-first/second, matchup and brick rates are inferred or unknown Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied Deck title is null