Dogmatika Deck #774566 — Yu-Gi-Oh! TCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 35/100 (±8 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Combo, Toolbox
• Format: tcg

Legality

Main 55 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 3 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Fusion Summon Level 8 Dragons (Albion the Sanctifire Dragon, The Dragon that Devours the Dogma, Titaniklad, Mirrorjade) from Fallen of Albaz / Fallen of the White Dragon material, converting Extra Deck monsters into 2500-3000 ATK boards; Branded Fusion and Branded Opening lines recovering Despia and Dogmatika monsters, with Mulcharmy draw engines extending the hand
• Turn 1 (going first): Opening Mulcharmy/Nadir Servant or Fallen of the White Dragon to reach a Fallen of Albaz or Branded starter, then Fusion Summon a Level 8 Dragon through Fallen of Albaz material; protect the line with Ash Blossom and The Fallen & The Virtuous
• Turn 2 (going second): Hand traps (Ash Blossom, Ghost Ogre & Snow Rabbit, Droll & Lock Bird, Nibiru) and Solemn Judgment / Harpie's Feather Duster to blunt the opponent's board, then rebuild with Fusion and Synchro follow-ups
• Recovery: Mulcharmy draw effects and Dogmatika Ecclesia / Blazing Cartesia searches recover cards from the GY and Deck; Fallen of Albaz recursion through Ecclesia and Swordsoul material
• After siding: Not evaluable: the deck has no Side Deck, so no post-side plan exists

Why it scores here

The deck's Fallen of Albaz engine is well supported: the archetype core is present in about 97% of opening hands (hypergeometric, Inferred), and several searchers and Mulcharmy draw effects add redundancy. Its interaction suite is broad, with ten hand traps, several Solemn traps, and a Droll & Lock Bird, which gives it a real going-second plan. Conversion reaches 2500 to 3000 ATK Level 8 Dragons, so closing power is strong when the line connects. However, no recorded boards exist, so the ceiling and median are text-based inferences, and the median is set lower than the ceiling to reflect that. The deck is illegal in its format (three cards over their copy limits), and it has no Side Deck, so it cannot receive a normal Final score. Popularity and archetype usage were not counted as power, and no card scores were averaged.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange. Structural ≈ 57, Going First ≈ 60, Going Second ≈ 55, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 48. Modifiers: illegal_copy_limit (-12); no_side_deck (0). Final formula: Illegal deck: theoretical/structural-only. Unlegal baseline 0.80*57 + 0.20*48 = 55; capped to 35 because the deck exceeds copy limits on three Semi-Limited cards and has no Side Deck

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.97 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.03 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Archetype core is present in almost every opening hand (96.6%, Inferred)
• Layered interaction: ten hand traps, three Solemn cards, Droll & Lock Bird and Harpie's Feather Duster
• High closing power from Level 8 Fusion Monsters at 2500-3000 ATK
• Recovery through Mulcharmy draw effects and Ecclesia/Swordsoul recursion

Weaknesses

• Illegal as built: three cards exceed their copy limits
• No Side Deck, so no post-side adaptation
• Long Fusion chains depend on specific material, creating fragility
• No recorded boards, so conversion is unmeasured

Critical choke points

• Fallen of Albaz (1 copy) and Branded Fusion (1 copy) are single-card gates for the main Fusion line
• Level 8 Fusion access depends on Extra Deck material that a single disruption can remove

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Main 55, Extra 15, Side 0 counts and copy-limit violations; Card text, stats and banlist status for all cards; Archetype core usage stats (archetype core ~96.6% inclusion)
• Inferred: Opening-hand consistency from hypergeometric draw odds; Interaction density from card text; Combo ceiling and median from text only, with no recorded boards
• Provisional: Meta and format fit (no dated metagame sample); Tournament reliability (no win-rate telemetry)
• Data gaps: no combos supplied — combo floor/median/ceiling is text-only inference no tournament link — archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent no win-rate telemetry exists in YGOVN — going-first/second and matchup signals are Inferred or Unknown Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied No Side Deck supplied, so D12 cannot be measured beyond its absence