Voidvelg Deck #774418 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Rush Duel Sevens

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 50/100 (±12 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Combo
• Format: rush-duel-sevens

Legality

Main 35 / Extra 0 / Side 0 — status: Legal with warning.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Boss monsters with high ATK, recurred and pressured through Voidvelg Fusion/Contact Fusion lines (guide-described, Inferred); Direct pressure from recovered boss monsters (Inferred)
• Turn 1 (going first): Open a Voidvelg starter (3-copy cards, P(at least one in 5 cards) about 0.38 each) and convert it into a boss via fusion (Inferred)
• Turn 2 (going second): Six-card hand with a starter and enough resources to rebuild after the opponent's board (Inferred)
• Recovery: Recover boss or starter cards from the graveyard or hand, per guide descriptions of continuous board recovery (Inferred)
• After siding: Not determinable: the deck has zero side cards, so there is no post-side plan.

Why it scores here

The deck opens a Voidvelg plan reliably enough on paper: 14 of the 15 archetype-core cards from usage statistics are present, and the 35-card Main Deck is compact at 16 distinct passcodes, which is in the Rush Duel size range. Guides describe continuous board recovery and boss pressure, which earns resilience and closing points as Inferred. The score is not driven by Voidvelg's popularity, which only confirms that the list is real and accessible. It is not an average of card scores, which cannot be computed here because 16 of 16 passcodes are unresolved. The score stays low-confidence because there are no recorded boards, no card text, no tournament data and no side deck.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange. Structural ≈ 53.4, Going First ≈ 55, Going Second ≈ 48, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 45. Modifiers: No side deck (-2). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers (Meta provisional): 0.80*53.4 + 0.20*45 = 51.7, then -2 modifier = 49.7, rounded to 50

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ — · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Compact 35-card Main Deck with high copy redundancy (Verified)
• 14 of 15 archetype-core cards present in the usage statistics (Verified)
• Guide-described boss pressure and recursion (Inferred)

Weaknesses

• 16 of 16 passcodes unresolved; no card text, types or names (Verified)
• No side deck (Verified)
• No recorded boards, so the floor and median are unmeasured (Verified)

Critical choke points

• The starter-to-boss fusion line depends on specific 3-copy cards that cannot be identified from the evidence (Inferred)

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality status and 35-card Main Deck count within the 30-60 size rule; Copy histogram: 8 cards at 3 copies, 3 at 2, 5 at 1; Banlist status Unlimited for all 16 distinct passcodes per the export; 0 Extra Deck and 0 Side Deck cards; 14 of 15 core usage cards present (93.3%)
• Observed: Three guides for Voidvelg describe boss pressure and recursion
• Inferred: Opening-hand starter probabilities from the hypergeometric draw table; Midrange primary strategy from guide descriptions of fusion, recovery and boss pressure; Resilience, resource and closing scores from guide text
• Provisional: Meta Power (null); Matchup and format fit (D13 = 50 placeholder); Going-second score (no split data)
• Data gaps: All 16 distinct passcodes unresolved: no card names, types, text or stats No combos supplied; floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link; archetype meta-share and per-pilot record absent No win-rate telemetry; going-first, going-second and matchup signals are Inferred or Unknown Meta Power is provisional without a dated metagame sample Legality is reported as Legal with warning but the export gives no size_warnings or violations to explain it