Wyrms : Rush! Deck #774412 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Rush Duel Sevens

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 42/100 (±15 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: FTK/Alternate-Win
• Format: rush-duel-sevens

Legality

Main 38 / Extra 0 / Side 0 — status: Legal with warning.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Unverified: the guide snippets describe a Wyrm OTK/burn-style finish, but no resolved card text or boards confirm the mechanism.; Unverified; no recorded combo evidence.
• Turn 1 (going first): Unknown: 17 distinct passcodes are unresolved, so starters, extenders and the T1 line cannot be identified from the evidence.
• Turn 2 (going second): Unknown: no going-second split or board data exists.
• Recovery: Unknown: no recursion or float text is available.
• After siding: Not applicable: the deck runs no side deck.

Why it scores here

The score rests on the deck's structure alone: 38 main-deck cards in 17 distinct passcodes, with nine 3-copy and three 2-copy cards, a size inside the 30-60 range and no Extra or Side deck. The hypergeometric numbers are Inferred: a single 3-copy card has about a 35% chance of appearing in a 5-card opener, and about a 99.9% chance that at least one card from the 27-copy group appears. Those figures show that some core card is almost always present, but not that the card is a functional starter, because the card names, types and text are all unresolved. No combo boards exist, so floor, median and ceiling cannot be separated and are all scored low-to-mid as unknowns. The guide snippets call the deck Tier 1 and describe OTK potential, but that is speculation and does not move the score. The scores were not averaged from individual card scores.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 42, Going First ≈ 40, Going Second ≈ 38, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 42. Modifiers: none. Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional, no dated metagame sample)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ — · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Legal size and copy limits with no banned cards
• Compact 17-card distinct list with redundancy on 9 three-copy cards
• Usage stats show the core cards are present (13 of 19 core cards)

Weaknesses

• All 17 cards unresolved, so the engine cannot be verified
• No interaction, recursion or negation text
• No combo boards, so floor and ceiling are unknown
• No Side Deck

Critical choke points

• Starter identity unresolved: any failure of the 3-copy core leaves the opener without a verified starter
• No Side Deck means no post-side adaptation

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality: 38 main cards within the 30-60 size rule, 0 Extra, 0 Side; Copy histogram 5/3/9 across 17 distinct passcodes; Hypergeometric draw odds for 3-copy and 2-copy cards
• Observed: Usage stats: 13 of 19 archetype core cards present, 100% inclusion for several
• Inferred: Core-group opener presence (~0.999) as a proxy for starter access; Brick and interruption estimates from copy structure
• Provisional: Meta power and matchup fit; Floor, median and ceiling of combo output
• Data gaps: All 17 card passcodes unresolved (no names, types or text) No combo boards recorded No tournament link or meta-share No win-rate telemetry Rush Duel opening-hand rules assumed rather than verified Card archetype field null, so core-group estimate is unreliable