Ether Dragon Deck #773995 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Rush Duel Sevens
30 Main, incl. Innocent Fadrawl x3, The Ultimate Flag x3, Amazing Dealer x3 - Skill: Destiny Draw: Divine Dragons. Created Oct 25, 2026 by YGO Mod.
Deck Ether Dragon Rush Duel Sevens
Created by: YGO Mod (20517634)
Created On: 10/25/2026
Destiny Draw: Divine Dragons
Couldn't load the deck
Deck — Deck Power Evaluation
Final Contextual Deck Power: 51/100 (±12 · Confidence: Low)
| Overall score | Value |
|---|---|
| Structural Deck Power | 52 |
| Going First | 50 |
| Going Second | 45 |
| Meta Power | provisional |
| Tournament Reliability | 48 |
- Primary strategy: Control
- Secondary strategies: Blind-Second/OTK
- Format: rush-duel-sevens
Legality
Main 30 / Extra 0 / Side 0 — status: Legal with warning.
Identity & game plan
- Win condition: Boss monsters (guide cites a level 9 Eternity Ether Dragon) that clear the opposing board; unverified because no card in the list resolved; Guide-described OTK potential via the Destiny Draw skill and level 9 Dragon Special Summon; text-only, no recorded boards
- Turn 1 (going first): Open on the 3-copy core, reach a board-clearing boss, and keep the 1-2 copy starters as backups; exact lines cannot be confirmed without resolved card names
- Turn 2 (going second): Use the hand's interaction and boss-summon route to answer an established board; no hand-trap flags were resolved, so this is Inferred
- Recovery: Resource-rich recovery is described in the guide; the mechanism is not verifiable from the evidence
- After siding: No side deck is present, so no post-side plan exists in this list
Why it scores here
The deck is a compact 30-card, 12-distinct-card list with no Extra Deck and no Side Deck, and its nine 3-copy and 2-copy cards form a heavily repeated core. The archetype's core cards are included at high rates in the usage statistics, which confirms the list is a real, accessible build but does not make it strong. Per-card hypergeometric odds (about 0.43 for a 3-copy card in a 5-card going-first hand) are the only consistency evidence, and they cannot be tied to named starters because the card names did not resolve. The guide's description of resource-rich, board-clearing control earns the resource and interaction scores only as Inferred. No combo boards were recorded, so the score rests on the system as a whole and not on an average of card scores or on the deck's popularity.
Dimension scores
| # | Dimension | Score | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Engine Accessibility & Consistency | 52 | P(≥1 of a 3-copy card in 5-card opener) ≈ 0.43; core group present 27/30 copies; starter identity unresolved (Inferred) |
| D2 | Opening-Hand Quality & Brick Management | 50 | 30 cards across 12 distinct passcodes with 8 cards at 3 copies suggests moderate redundancy but no brick estimate is possible (Inferred) |
| D3 | Combo Conversion & Ceiling | 45 | No recorded boards; ceiling inferred only from guide text describing a level 9 boss and OTK potential (Inferred) |
| D4 | Combo Floor & Median Output | 40 | No recorded boards, so median output cannot be measured; the score is a low-confidence placeholder (Provisional) |
| D5 | Interruption Resilience & Route Redundancy | 50 | Guide describes continuous disruption, but no independent second line can be identified from unresolved cards (Inferred) |
| D6 | Resource Economy, Recovery & Grind | 62 | Guide describes a resource-rich control plan; no float or search text was resolved to confirm it (Inferred) |
| D7 | End-Board & Interaction Quality | 60 | Guide describes destruction of any field card by a 500-ATK boss; no interaction flags were resolved to verify breadth (Inferred) |
| D8 | Going-Second & Board-Breaking Power | 45 | Going-second split unavailable; going-second strength rests on the same interaction text and is not measured (Inferred) |
| D9 | Offensive Pressure & Closing Power | 50 | Closing power depends on boss monsters named only in guide text; no ATK or stat data resolved (Inferred) |
| D10 | Main Deck Efficiency & Flexibility | 62 | 30 main cards, exactly the Rush Duel Sevens minimum, with 12 distinct cards and no off-plan slots (Verified) |
| D11 | Extra Deck Efficiency & Coverage | 50 | Extra Deck is empty, so the slot-efficiency and coverage claim is neutral and not scored on evidence (Verified) |
| D12 | Side Deck Adaptability | 30 | No Side Deck and no post-side data, so adaptability is low by construction (Verified) |
| D13 | Matchup Coverage & Format Fit | 50 | No dated metagame sample or tournament link; guide's meta-leader claim is context only and not a score input (Provisional) |
| D14 | Pilotability & Error Tolerance | 50 | Pilot difficulty unknown without resolved card text; guide implies multi-step lines that cannot be counted (Inferred) |
How the score was computed
Strategy profile: Control profile with D13 dropped and weights re-normalized (sum 93) because Meta is provisional. Structural ≈ 52, Going First ≈ 50, Going Second ≈ 45, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 48. Modifiers: none. Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional); Structural = Σ(score×weight)/Σweight with D13 dropped (4813/93 ≈ 51.8)
Probability & combo summary
- Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ — · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
- Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
- Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines
Strengths
- Compact 30-card main with 12 distinct cards and no off-plan slots (Verified)
- Core archetype cards are included at high usage rates in the archetype statistics (Verified)
- Guide describes board-clearing boss and resource-rich control (Inferred)
Weaknesses
- 12 of 12 passcodes did not resolve, so no card names, types or text are available (Verified)
- No recorded combo boards, so ceiling and median are unmeasured (Verified)
- No Side Deck, so there is no post-side plan (Verified)
- Exact-name archetype purity is 0 while the probability table reports 27 core copies, an internal inconsistency (Verified)
Critical choke points
- Any single 3-copy starter has only about a 0.43 chance of appearing in a 5-card opening hand (Inferred)
- Boss-monster access is described only in guide text and cannot be checked against card data (Inferred)
Recommended changes
| Priority | Remove | Add | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | none | none | Re-export the deck with resolved card names and text so the starters, hand traps and boss monsters can be scored from evidence rather than guide text |
| 2 | none | none | Record at least a few boards for this deck so the combo ceiling and median can be scored |
| 3 | none | none | Fix the archetype-purity export so exact-name purity agrees with the core-copy count |
Evidence & confidence
- Verified: Legal with warning, 30 main, 0 extra, 0 side, no violations (legality block); 12 distinct passcodes with copy histogram 3×8, 2×2, 1×2 (composition); Core archetype cards at 83–100% inclusion in usage statistics (usage statistics); No tournament link and no recorded combos (tournament data, combo data)
- Observed: Usage statistics show the archetype-standard core is run at high inclusion
- Inferred: Per-copy hypergeometric odds (≈0.43 for 3-copy cards) as a consistency estimate; Control and OTK strategy read from guide text; Boss and interaction capability from guide text
- Provisional: Meta Power is null; any meta-share context is provisional and was not scored; D13 matchup fit was dropped from the structural score
- Data gaps: All 12 passcodes unresolved; card names, types, ATK and text are missing No combos supplied; combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link; archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent Archetype purity contradicts the core-copy count No win-rate telemetry; going-first and going-second splits are unknown Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied
Couldn't load the combos







