Gradius: Rush! Deck #773989 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Rush Duel Sevens
30 Main, 3 Extra, incl. Gradius' Option x3, Multiple x3, Super-Dimensional Lord British Space Fighter x3 - Skill: Avaricious Destiny Draw. Created Oct 25, 2026 by YGO Mod.
Deck Gradius: Rush! Rush Duel Sevens
Created by: YGO Mod (20517634)
Created On: 10/25/2026
Avaricious Destiny Draw
Main Deck (30)
- Gradius' Option x3
- Multiple x3
- Super-Dimensional Lord British Space Fighter x3
- Vic Viper Beginning x1
- Vic Viper Spread Bomb x3
- Cyber Serpent x3
- Gradius x2
- Pot of Avarice x1
- Power Capsule Red x3
- Power Meter x3
- Shiny Shady x1
- Star Protector's Protection x3
- Widespread Ruin x1
Extra Deck (3)
error
Couldn't load the deck
45± 15/ 100
Power Score
Structural
43
Reliability
42
Going First
42
Going Second
40
Deck — Deck Power Evaluation
Final Contextual Deck Power: 45/100 (±15 · Confidence: Low)
| Overall score | Value |
|---|---|
| Structural Deck Power | 43 |
| Going First | 42 |
| Going Second | 40 |
| Meta Power | provisional |
| Tournament Reliability | 42 |
- Primary strategy: Combo
- Secondary strategies: Tempo
- Format: rush-duel-sevens
Legality
Main 33 / Extra 0 / Side 0 — status: Legal with warning.
Identity & game plan
- Win condition: Not determinable from card text. The guide describes a Light Machine spam line: summon monsters, rename them to Gradius or Gradius' Option, then link them together (Inferred from guide text).; Unknown; no card text, boards or combos available.
- Turn 1 (going first): Unknown; the guide's spam-rename-link line is the only described plan and its opening starter cannot be identified from the export.
- Turn 2 (going second): Unknown; no interaction or board-breaking cards can be identified from the export.
- Recovery: Unknown; no recursion or recovery text is available.
- After siding: None; the deck runs no side cards (side_count 0).
Why it scores here
The deck is legal in size (33 main cards, inside the 30-60 range) and its list matches the archetype's usage-statistics core: all 13 core cards are present, 9 of them at three copies. That consistency and the compact 14-distinct-card build earn the modest D1, D2 and D10 scores. The rest of the score rests on nothing the evidence can verify: all 14 passcodes are unresolved, no card text, roles, boards or combos were supplied, and the one guide snippet describes a spam-rename-link plan only in prose. Every combo, interaction, resilience and closing dimension therefore sits at a neutral 40 rather than a real measured value, and confidence is Low. Popularity and archetype usage were not treated as power; no card scores were averaged into the deck score.
Dimension scores
| # | Dimension | Score | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Engine Accessibility & Consistency | 45 | P(>=1 copy of a 3-of card in a 5-card opening hand) = 0.40 per card, 0.15 to 0.28 for 1-2 copy cards; no starter identified, 13/13 usage-core cards present (Inferred, Verified for core presence) |
| D2 | Opening-Hand Quality & Brick Management | 45 | Copy histogram 4x1, 1x2, 9x3 gives 14 distinct cards over 33 slots, so redundancy is plausible, but no card roles are known to confirm functional vs dead cards (Inferred) |
| D3 | Combo Conversion & Ceiling | 40 | No recorded boards and no parseable combo steps; the guide's spam-rename-link line is prose only, so the ceiling is unmeasured (Provisional) |
| D4 | Combo Floor & Median Output | 40 | combos_evidence is empty (total_combos 0), so floor and median output cannot be read; neutral placeholder (Provisional) |
| D5 | Interruption Resilience & Route Redundancy | 40 | No second independent line can be identified without card text; starter_diversity unavailable (Provisional) |
| D6 | Resource Economy, Recovery & Grind | 40 | No resource or recovery text available; resource_signature absent (Provisional) |
| D7 | End-Board & Interaction Quality | 40 | No interaction, negate or removal text available; role_tag_counts are all zero only because cards are unresolved (Provisional) |
| D8 | Going-Second & Board-Breaking Power | 40 | No going-second split and no board-breaker text; unmeasured (Provisional) |
| D9 | Offensive Pressure & Closing Power | 40 | No ATK, boss-monster or direct-attack data for the end board; unmeasured (Provisional) |
| D10 | Main Deck Efficiency & Flexibility | 60 | 33 main cards, 14 distinct, legal size 30-60, copy spread tight at 3-of with 9 three-copy cards (Verified) |
| D11 | Extra Deck Efficiency & Coverage | 50 | Rush Duel export shows extra_count 0; the Extra-Deck criterion is not applicable, so scored neutral at 50 (Verified) |
| D12 | Side Deck Adaptability | 35 | side_count 0, so there is no side deck and no post-side plan to assess (Verified) |
| D13 | Matchup Coverage & Format Fit | 45 | tournament_context unavailable and no dated metagame sample supplied; neutral placeholder (Provisional) |
| D14 | Pilotability & Error Tolerance | 50 | Guide describes a spam, rename and link sequence that needs name tracking; step count is not in examples, so the 50 is a guess (Inferred) |
How the score was computed
Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 43, Going First ≈ 42, Going Second ≈ 40, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 42. Modifiers: Usage-core alignment (2). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers (Meta provisional, no dated metagame sample)
Probability & combo summary
- Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ — · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
- Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
- Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines
Strengths
- Legal main size (33) with a tight 3-of-heavy copy spread (9 cards at three copies)
- All 13 usage-core cards are present, so the list matches the archetype standard
- Compact 14-distinct-card main deck with no excess distinct cards
Weaknesses
- All 14 passcodes are unresolved, so no card names, types, text or roles can be checked
- No combos, boards or interaction data, so every power dimension is an unmeasured placeholder
- No side deck, so no post-side adaptation
- 9 of 14 passcodes are negative (manual) IDs whose function and legal status cannot be checked from the export
Critical choke points
- The rename-to-Gradius step described in the guide is a single point of failure if the naming or Light Machine condition is not met (Inferred from guide prose)
Recommended changes
| Priority | Remove | Add | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | none | none | Resolve all 14 passcodes to card names, types and text, then re-run the evaluation. Until then the score cannot move far from its neutral placeholders. |
| 2 | none | none | Record at least one combo board so that D3, D4 and the starter probabilities can be measured instead of inferred. |
Evidence & confidence
- Verified: Main deck size 33 is inside the rush-duel-sevens range of 30-60; Copy histogram 4x1, 1x2, 9x3 totals 33 and 14 distinct cards; All 13 usage-core cards are present in the deck; No Extra Deck or side deck cards in the export
- Observed: Guide text (single truncated snippet) describes a Light Machine spam line, renaming to Gradius or Gradius' Option, then linking
- Inferred: P(>=1 copy of a 3-of card in a 5-card opening hand) = 0.40, from the hypergeometric draw table; Consistency and resilience scores follow from the copy spread and the spam-and-link description, not from measured boards
- Provisional: Meta power and matchup fit: no dated metagame sample or tournament context was supplied; All combo, interaction and closing scores: no combo or card-text data was supplied
- Data gaps: 14 passcodes in CardIDList could not be resolved to a card (name, type and text all null) No combos supplied; combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link; archetype meta-share and per-pilot record absent Only one guide snippet (section_count 0), truncated mid-sentence No win-rate telemetry exists in YGOVN; going-first, going-second, matchup and brick rates are Inferred or Unknown Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied
error
Couldn't load the combos
Menu
https://metaduelist.com/