Tenpai Dragon Deck #773853 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 55/100 (±8 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Toolbox
• Secondary strategies: Midrange, Control
• Format: master-duel

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Synchro/Xyz/Link boss pressure (Trident Dragion, Sangenpai Transcendent Dragion, Super Starslayer TY-PHON, Baronne de Fleur) reached through the FIRE Dragon / Sangen engine; Mulcharmy card-draw chip damage and Odd-Eyes / Black Rose board pressure
• Turn 1 (going first): Search or summon a Tenpai/Sangen FIRE Dragon (Dora Dora, Paidra, Sangen Kaimen, Striker Dragon), clear with Dark Hole, Raigeki, Heavy Storm or Lightning Storm, then Synchro into a 3000-ATK boss
• Turn 2 (going second): Hand trap (Maxx C) and board-wipe interaction in the first response window, then rebuild the engine through the Sangen searchers and Genroku/Fadra recursion
• Recovery: Sangenpai Bident Dragion and Fadra recur Level 4 or lower FIRE Dragons from the GY; Pot of Sloth and Mulcharmy draws rebuild hand size
• After siding: Not assessable: the deck runs 0 side cards, so no post-side plan is recorded

Why it scores here

The deck reliably produces interaction: three Dark Hole, Raigeki and Heavy Storm style wipes, plus Maxx C, Harpie's Feather Duster, Lightning Storm and Forbidden Droplet, give it end-board control density that drives the highest dimension score. Its engine is thin. Each Tenpai starter has only a 24 to 34 percent chance to appear in the opening hand (Inferred hypergeometric estimate), and the Sangen and Dora Dora searchers are the real access route, with about 58 percent chance of at least one searcher in hand. Its closing power sits in the 2600 to 3000 ATK Synchro and Xyz bosses, but exact-name archetype purity is only 12.7 percent, so the Tenpai engine is diluted by off-archetype tech and spells. The score comes from consistency, median output and interaction taken together on the system, not from Tenpai Dragon's popularity, and not from averaging card scores. No combo boards were recorded, so the ceiling and median are text-based inference.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Toolbox. Structural ≈ 59, Going First ≈ 60, Going Second ≈ 62, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 52. Modifiers: Engine dilution (-3). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers (Meta provisional, no dated metagame sample)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.34 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Very high interaction density: multiple wipes plus Maxx C and Duster
• Six searchers and two draw engines give card-flow redundancy
• Broad Extra Deck with 3000-ATK synchro bosses and link coverage

Weaknesses

• Thin Tenpai starter access (Genroku 0.338, Paidra 0.237 in opening 5)
• 12.7 percent exact-archetype purity; engine diluted by tech
• Spell-heavy main with several situational cards raises brick risk
• No recorded combo boards, so ceiling and median are unmeasured

Critical choke points

• Reliance on the Sangen and Dora Dora searchers to reach a live engine
• Single hand trap (Maxx C) for going-second interaction

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legal status and size: 40 main, 15 extra, 0 side within Master Duel rules; Six Limited cards run at legal copies (1 each); Copy histogram 1:10, 2:3, 3:8; Extra Deck split 11 Synchro, 3 Link, 1 Xyz; Usage stats: archetype core present at 14 of 21 cards
• Observed: Usage statistics confirm the list is a real, accessible build (archetype-standard core present)
• Inferred: Starter hypergeometric odds and searcher access; Brick risk from situational spells; Interaction density and going-second board breaking; Ceiling and median from card text alone
• Provisional: Meta Power (null, no dated metagame sample); Matchup and format fit (no tournament link); Side-deck adaptability (0 side cards)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot record absent No win-rate telemetry: going-first and going-second splits, matchup and brick rates are Inferred or Unknown Meta Power is Provisional without a dated metagame sample Usage statistics conflict with the card list: Sangenpai Bident Dragion, Sangenpai Transcendent Dragion, Trident Dragion, Hiita, Baronne de Fleur, Kuibelt and Odd-Eyes Meteorburst are listed in the cards array (Extra zone) but flagged in this deck false in missing core cards; the Extra Deck was treated as present Side deck is empty (0 cards), so no post-side plan can be evaluated