Fairy Tail Deck #773764 — Yu-Gi-Oh! TCG
54 Main, 15 Extra, incl. Fairy Tail - Luna x3, Mulcharmy Fuwalos x3, Mulcharmy Purulia x3. Created Oct 24, 2026 by YGO Mod.
Created by: YGO Mod (20517634)
Created On: 10/24/2026
Main Deck (54)
- Crowley, the Gifted Magistus x1
- Droll & Lock Bird x1
- Fairy Tail - Luna x3
- Fairy Tail - Matchgiru x1
- Fairy Tail - Snow x1
- Genia of the Ring x1
- Mulcharmy Fuwalos x3
- Mulcharmy Purulia x3
- Nibiru, the Primal Being x2
- Regulus, the Prince of Endymion x3
- Spenta, the Magistus Sealer x1
- Verre, the Maid of Endymion x1
- Witchcrafter Genni x1
- Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring x3
- Ghost Ogre & Snow Rabbit x3
- Zoroa, the Magistus of Flame x1
- Cosmic Cyclone x2
- Endymion Empire x1
- Fairy Tail Ball x2
- Hey, Space Trunade! x3
- Instant Fusion x1
- Once Upon a Fairy Tail x1
- Spell Power Mastery x3
- Tails of the Fairy Tails x1
- Verre Magic - Lacrima of Light x2
- Infinite Impermanence x3
- Solemn Accusation x2
- Solemn Judgment x1
- Typhoon x3
Extra Deck (15)
- Magistus Chorozo x2
- Teller of Fairy Tails x1
- Weaver of Fairy Tails x1
- Zoroa, the Magistus Verethragna x1
- A Bao A Qu, the Lightless Shadow x1
- Accesscode Talker x1
- Artemis, the Magistus Moon Maiden x2
- Endymion, the Crescent Magistus x1
- S:P Little Knight x1
- Selene, Queen of the Master Magicians x1
- Summon Sorceress x1
- Fairy Tail - Wiccat x1
- Ninaruru, the Magistus Glass Goddess x1
Couldn't load the deck
Deck — Deck Power Evaluation
Final Contextual Deck Power: 30/100 (±8 · Confidence: Medium)
| Overall score | Value |
|---|---|
| Structural Deck Power | 53 |
| Going First | 52 |
| Going Second | 58 |
| Meta Power | provisional |
| Tournament Reliability | 45 |
- Primary strategy: Midrange
- Secondary strategies: Combo, Toolbox
- Format: tcg
Legality
Main 54 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 1 violation(s).
Identity & game plan
- Win condition: Extra Deck Link/Fusion/Xyz engines (Endymion, Magistus, Fairy Tail, Mulcharmy lines) converting a Fairy Tail or Endymion board into multi-monster pressure; Fairy Tail Fusion and Xyz boards (Teller, Weaver, Wiccat) backed by Instant Fusion and Genia
- Turn 1 (going first): Open a searcher (Regulus, Verre, Genni, Matchgiru, Genia or Fairy Tail Ball) and set up a Link or Fusion route; without a hand trap in hand the line has no protection on turn 1
- Turn 2 (going second): Hold Ash Blossom, Ghost Ogre, Droll & Lock Bird or Infinite Impermanence to break the opponent's first board, then rebuild through Mulcharmy draw and Regulus recursion
- Recovery: Mulcharmy Fuwalos and Purulia draw on opponent summons; Verre and Endymion Empire re-add the Endymion engine from Deck or GY
- After siding: Not applicable: the deck runs no Side Deck, so there is no post-side plan (Inferred from the empty side count)
Why it scores here
The deck reliably opens a searcher-based starter: the archetype core has P(at least one core card in a 5-card opening hand) of about 0.98 and P(at least one searcher-text card) of about 0.84, so the engine is accessible on the first turns (Inferred from hypergeometric estimates). Interaction is dense for a Midrange list: 12 hand-trap cards, 15 negation-text and 15 removal-text cards, plus Solemn Judgment and Solemn Accusation give it real answers to the opponent's first board, which is what keeps D7 and D8 above the middle. Conversion and median output could not be measured because no recorded boards exist, so D3 and D4 are text-only inferences and are capped accordingly. The main weaknesses are structural: only 11.6% of the main deck is exact Fairy Tail, the engine is split across Magistus, Endymion, Mulcharmy and Fairy Tail sub-archetypes, the deck has no Side Deck, and it runs 3 copies of Semi-Limited Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring, which makes the list illegal. The score is not an average of card scores and does not reflect archetype popularity (core inclusion is 68%, but that is a usage signal, not power); the Illegal status caps the final contextual score at 30 and makes this a theoretical, structural-only read.
Dimension scores
| # | Dimension | Score | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Engine Accessibility & Consistency | 62 | P(>=1 archetype-core card in 5-card opening hand) ~0.98 and P(>=1 searcher-text card) ~0.84; engine split across four sub-archetypes lowers coherence (Inferred) |
| D2 | Opening-Hand Quality & Brick Management | 50 | 29 distinct main-deck cards with 14 singletons and 61 off-exact-archetype copies; 12 hand-trap and 16 searcher-text cards give a functional opening but some dead-card risk (Inferred) |
| D3 | Combo Conversion & Ceiling | 50 | No parseable recorded boards (combos_evidence total_combos 0); ceiling read only from card text of Link/Fusion/Xyz engines such as Endymion, Teller and Zoroa Verethragna (Inferred) |
| D4 | Combo Floor & Median Output | 42 | No combo median or power distribution exists; floor estimated from starter diversity and the number of single-card starters (Inferred) |
| D5 | Interruption Resilience & Route Redundancy | 58 | 12 hand traps and Mulcharmy/Regulus recursion give several independent continuation routes after one interruption (Inferred) |
| D6 | Resource Economy, Recovery & Grind | 60 | Searcher density (16 searcher-text cards) and Mulcharmy draw effects recover card economy; no resource_signature data is supplied (Inferred) |
| D7 | End-Board & Interaction Quality | 64 | 15 negation-text and 15 removal-text cards, with Solemn Judgment, Solemn Accusation and Typhoon as layered answers; interaction_density_avg not available (Inferred) |
| D8 | Going-Second & Board-Breaking Power | 60 | Going-second split not recorded; board-breaking comes from hand traps such as Ash Blossom, Ghost Ogre, Droll & Lock Bird and Infinite Impermanence (Inferred) |
| D9 | Offensive Pressure & Closing Power | 55 | Closing power from Zoroa Verethragna (2900 ATK), Magistus Chorozo (2800 DEF) and A Bao A Qu (2800 ATK) on the Extra Deck; no end-board data (Inferred) |
| D10 | Main Deck Efficiency & Flexibility | 52 | 54 main cards in a 40-60 range with 25 Level-0 spell/trap cards and 14 singletons; a compact engine is undercut by off-archetype staples (Inferred) |
| D11 | Extra Deck Efficiency & Coverage | 55 | 15 Extra Deck slots, 13 distinct: 8 Link, 5 Fusion, 2 Xyz across four sub-archetypes; several Extra cards need specific partners (Verified structure, Inferred coherence) |
| D12 | Side Deck Adaptability | 10 | No Side Deck (side_count 0), so no post-side adaptability at all (Verified) |
| D13 | Matchup Coverage & Format Fit | 45 | No tournament link and no dated meta sample; archetype meta-share absent, so this dimension is provisional (Provisional) |
| D14 | Pilotability & Error Tolerance | 40 | Multi-step engines (Link chains, Fusion material, Magistus equip and Endymion searches) and many decision points on each turn; error tolerance is low (Inferred) |
How the score was computed
Strategy profile: Midrange. Structural ≈ 53, Going First ≈ 52, Going Second ≈ 58, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 45. Modifiers: Illegal copy-limit violation (-12); Limited-card dependence (-3); No side deck (-3). Final formula: Illegal cap applied: unmodified 0.80*Structural(53) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(45) = 51.6, with modifiers -12 gives 39.6, capped to 30 because the deck is Illegal (theoretical/structural-only); Meta provisional
Couldn't load the combos
