White Forest Deck #773737 — Yu-Gi-Oh! TCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 30/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox
• Format: tcg

Legality

Main 54 / Extra 17 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 2 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Synchro pressure from 3000-ATK Angelechy Shatranga / Angelechy Bastion / Angelechy Seneschal, enabled by the Angelechy and White Forest Spell/Trap search and Extra Deck access chain (Inferred); White Forest Synchro monsters (Diabell, Silvera, Rciela) as a second board, if the Extra Deck is trimmed to a legal size (Inferred)
• Turn 1 (going first): Opening Spell/Trap searchers and Angelechy monsters to set up a Synchro Summon, with Ash Blossom and Effect Veiler held as interaction (Inferred; no combo evidence supplied)
• Turn 2 (going second): Hand traps (Ash Blossom, Effect Veiler, Angelechy Disturbance / Opening to e4) to answer the opponent's first board, then Synchro through the held-back interaction (Inferred)
• Recovery: Recur Angelechy and White Forest pieces through Tales of the White Forest, Witch of the White Forest and Angelechy Brilliant Move from GY and Extra Deck (Inferred from card text)
• After siding: Not evaluable: the deck has 0 Side Deck cards, so there is no post-side plan.

Why it scores here

The deck is scored as a system: it reliably reaches a Synchro-capable board through the Angelechy and White Forest search chain (P(at least one archetype-core card in opening 5) ≈ 0.94, Inferred), and it has real interaction density with 5 hand traps, 15 negation-text cards and 19 removal-text cards. Its ceiling is limited by the lack of any recorded boards, so the combo conversion and floor/median dimensions are text-only inferences. The list is Illegal: Ash Blossom runs 3 copies against a Semi-Limited cap of 2, and the Extra Deck holds 17 cards against a cap of 15. Under the Illegal rule, the score is capped at 30 and labeled structural-only. Archetype popularity (White Forest at 100% usage on core cards) and no tournament data earned no points, and card scores were not averaged.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange primary (no secondary blend applied to weights). Structural ≈ 45, Going First ≈ 44, Going Second ≈ 48, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 35. Modifiers: banlist exposure (-6); extra_deck_over_limit (-3); no Side Deck (-2). Final formula: Illegal cap: 0.80*Structural(45) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(35) = 43, then modifiers -11 → 32, capped at 30 (theoretical/structural-only; Meta provisional)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.94 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Archetype-core search density reliably finds Angelechy and White Forest pieces (Inferred from probabilities)
• Layered interaction: 5 hand traps, 15 negation-text and 19 removal-text cards
• Strong Synchro closers: 3000-ATK Shatranga, Bastion and Seneschal

Weaknesses

• Illegal as built: Ash Blossom over copy limit and Extra Deck over size
• Off-archetype dilution: 16.9% exact archetype purity with Dominus, Mulcharmy, Harpie, Forbidden and Magistus cards
• No side deck and no recorded combo evidence to confirm a median output

Critical choke points

• Extra Deck Synchro access: every closer depends on specific Angelechy Synchro Monsters being in the Extra Deck
• Ash Blossom copies beyond the legal limit are not playable in a legal event

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality: Ash Blossom 3 copies vs cap 2; Extra Deck 17 vs cap 15; Composition: 54 Main, 17 Extra, 0 Side; 16.9% exact archetype purity; Card text and stats for the listed Angelechy and White Forest cards
• Observed: Archetype usage: 100% inclusion for core White Forest cards
• Inferred: Opening-hand consistency P≈0.94 for the archetype-core group; Interaction quality from negation and removal text; Going-first and going-second plans
• Provisional: Meta Power and matchup fit: no dated metagame sample or tournament link
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inferences No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot record absent No win-rate telemetry: going-first/second, matchup and brick rates are Inferred or unknown Meta Power is provisional without a dated metagame sample Deck title is null in the export