Ether Dragon Deck #773450 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Rush Duel Sevens
30 Main, incl. Innocent Fadrawl x3, The Ultimate Flag x3, Amazing Dealer x3 - Skill: Destiny Draw: Divine Dragons. Created Oct 22, 2026 by YGO Mod.
Deck Ether Dragon Rush Duel Sevens
Created by: YGO Mod (20517634)
Created On: 10/22/2026
Destiny Draw: Divine Dragons
Couldn't load the deck
Deck — Deck Power Evaluation
Final Contextual Deck Power: 48/100 (±12 · Confidence: Low)
| Overall score | Value |
|---|---|
| Structural Deck Power | 51 |
| Going First | 52 |
| Going Second | 50 |
| Meta Power | provisional |
| Tournament Reliability | 48 |
- Primary strategy: Combo
- Secondary strategies: Control
- Format: rush-duel-sevens
Legality
Main 30 / Extra 0 / Side 0 — status: Legal with warning.
Identity & game plan
- Win condition: Boss level 9 Eternity Ether Dragon, named in guide 1377 (card text unresolved, Provisional); Guide 1486 claims an OTK ceiling via level 9 Dragon summoning (Provisional, not verified)
- Turn 1 (going first): Open on a 3-copy starter from the 9 triple-copy cards (about 43% per card in a 5-card hand, Inferred), then reach the boss
- Turn 2 (going second): Six-card hand has about 50% per triple-copy card (Inferred); boss and removal lines carry the board, unverified without card text
- Recovery: Multiple 3-copy redundancies suggest some re-access, but no recursion or search text was resolved (Inferred)
- After siding: No side deck; no post-side plan exists
Why it scores here
The deck is a compact 30-card main with 12 distinct cards, nine of them at three copies, so its redundancy is structural and verified by the copy histogram. Its core list matches the archetype usage statistics completely (10 of 10 core cards present), which confirms it is a real, accessible build but does not by itself make it strong. No recorded boards exist and no card text resolved, so the conversion, floor and median scores rest on text-level inference from two guides and are kept near neutral. Interaction and offensive scores credit the guides' claims of boss-driven board control and OTK potential only as Provisional. The score comes from consistency and compactness on the deck as a system, not from averaging card scores, and popularity earned no points on its own.
Dimension scores
| # | Dimension | Score | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Engine Accessibility & Consistency | 58 | P(at least one 3-copy card in opening 5) = 0.43 per card, P(1-copy) = 0.17; 9 redundant triple-copy starters; starter function unresolved (Inferred) |
| D2 | Opening-Hand Quality & Brick Management | 55 | 12 distinct cards, 9 at three copies and 3 at one copy; no brick estimate possible without card text (Inferred) |
| D3 | Combo Conversion & Ceiling | 45 | No recorded boards; ceiling is text-only inference from guide 1486's OTK claim (Provisional) |
| D4 | Combo Floor & Median Output | 40 | No combo boards, so no median or floor power index exists; the guides' typical-output claims are unverified (Provisional) |
| D5 | Interruption Resilience & Route Redundancy | 50 | Starter redundancy suggests some independent routes, but no recursion or search text resolved (Inferred) |
| D6 | Resource Economy, Recovery & Grind | 45 | No resource signature or net card advantage data; recovery is unmeasured (Inferred) |
| D7 | End-Board & Interaction Quality | 55 | Guide 1377 credits the boss with destroying any field card at 500 ATK; unresolved card text (Provisional) |
| D8 | Going-Second & Board-Breaking Power | 50 | Going-second split is absent; going-second strength is unmeasured (Inferred) |
| D9 | Offensive Pressure & Closing Power | 55 | Board-sweep closing is guide-claimed only; no ATK or piercing text resolved (Provisional) |
| D10 | Main Deck Efficiency & Flexibility | 70 | Compact 30-card main at the legal minimum, 12 distinct cards, high copy density (Verified) |
| D11 | Extra Deck Efficiency & Coverage | 50 | Zero Extra Deck cards is legal and neutral in this format; no Extra-Deck coverage to assess (Verified) |
| D12 | Side Deck Adaptability | 25 | No side deck at all; no post-side adaptation is possible (Verified) |
| D13 | Matchup Coverage & Format Fit | 50 | No tournament link; archetype meta-share absent, so matchup fit is neutral and Provisional |
| D14 | Pilotability & Error Tolerance | 60 | Few distinct cards and a single engine family suggest modest decision load; step counts unavailable (Inferred) |
How the score was computed
Strategy profile: 80% Combo, 20% Control (Control used only as a secondary tag; weights taken from Combo profile). Structural ≈ 51, Going First ≈ 52, Going Second ≈ 50, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 48. Modifiers: unresolved card text (-4); core list matches archetype standard (2). Final formula: 0.80*Structural(51) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(48) + ContextModifiers(-2) = 48; Meta provisional
Probability & combo summary
- Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.43 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
- Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
- Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines
Strengths
- Compact 12-card core with triple-copy redundancy (Verified)
- Full presence of archetype core usage cards (Verified)
- Legal 30-card main with no copy-limit violations (Verified)
Weaknesses
- No card text resolved for any of the 12 distinct cards (Verified gap)
- No recorded combo boards to measure conversion or median output
- No side deck, so no post-side adaptation
- No Extra Deck, so no extra-slot flexibility
Critical choke points
- Dependence on the single boss-level Dragon line described in guides, unverified without card text (Provisional)
Recommended changes
| Priority | Remove | Add | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | none | Resolve the 12 unresolved passcodes so card text, types and banlist status can be verified | Every consistency and interaction score is currently capped by missing card text, and the confidence stays Low until it is resolved |
Evidence & confidence
- Verified: Legality: 30 main, 0 extra, 0 side, within size rules; no copy-limit violations; Copy histogram: 9 cards at 3 copies, 3 cards at 1 copy; 10 of 10 archetype core usage cards present (100%); Hypergeometric draw values match the stated hand sizes (5 going first, 6 going second)
- Inferred: Combo primary strategy from guide intent and redundancy profile; Triple-copy cards functioning as starters and redundant engine access; Going-first and going-second estimates from draw odds and guide intent; Negative passcodes -970 and -867 behaving as manually created skill cards, per the project's card-id convention
- Provisional: Metagame strength claim in guide 1486 (no dated meta sample); Boss destruction and OTK ceiling claims from guides 1377 and 1486; Matchup fit and tournament reliability
- Data gaps: 12 passcodes unresolved: no card names, types, card text, banlist status or ATK values No combo boards, so no median, floor or ceiling power index No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot records absent No side deck or Extra Deck, so post-side and Extra-Deck signals are missing No win-rate telemetry; going-first and going-second results are unknown Meta Power is Provisional without a dated metagame sample
Couldn't load the combos







