Ether Dragon Deck #773449 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Rush Duel Sevens

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 57/100 (±10 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Control
• Secondary strategies: Blind-Second/OTK, Toolbox
• Format: rush-duel-sevens

Legality

Main 30 / Extra 0 / Side 0 — status: Legal with warning.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Level 9 boss (Eternity Ether Dragon) summoned via the Skill mechanic, then used to clear the opponent's board and push damage; the guide also describes an OTK route.; Board-wide control with repeated boss pressure; guides describe a possible OTK finish.
• Turn 1 (going first): Open a Skill-enabled level 9 Dragon line on turn 1 from one of the three-copy engine cards, then keep interaction for the opponent's turn. Exact turn-1 steps cannot be verified because card names and text are unresolved.
• Turn 2 (going second): Use a six-card hand to find one starter, then answer the opponent's board and summon the boss on the following turn. Going-second probability is slightly higher than going-first per copy (0.50 vs 0.43 for a triple).
• Recovery: Multiple distinct engine cards (eight at three copies) give redundant restart routes. Recovery depends on card text that the evidence does not supply.
• After siding: No sideboard in the export (side_count 0), so there is no documented post-side plan.

Why it scores here

The deck opens a playable plan reasonably often because eight distinct cards run three copies each, giving about 43% (going first) and 50% (going second) odds of at least one copy in the opening hand, and the archetype-core usage stats show the list is close to the standard build (9 of 10 core cards present). Interaction is the strongest signal: the guide describes a level 9 boss that destroys any card on the field with 500 ATK or less, which earns credit for board control (Inferred from guide text). Combo conversion and median output could not be measured, because no boards were recorded and the card names and text did not resolve, so those dimensions sit near neutral. Popularity and archetype usage confirm the list is real and accessible but did not raise the score by themselves, and the score did not come from averaging card scores. The large uncertainty band and Low confidence reflect the missing card text, the absent sideboard, and the lack of any tournament or meta data.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Control. Structural ≈ 58, Going First ≈ 56, Going Second ≈ 58, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 52. Modifiers: none. Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.43 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Eight distinct engine cards at three copies, giving redundancy
• Strong end-board interaction per guide description
• Legal main deck at the minimum size with all listed cards Unlimited
• Real, accessible archetype with 90% core presence

Weaknesses

• No sideboard, so no post-side plan
• Card names and text unresolved, so the engine cannot be verified
• No combo data to measure floor or median output
• Only about 43–50% per-copy odds to open a given triple-copy starter

Critical choke points

• The boss line depends on the Skill summon; if it is unavailable, the deck has no verified fallback
• Only 12 distinct cards means each slot carries high weight

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legal main deck of 30 cards with all listed cards Unlimited under BanDuelLink; Copy histogram 2×1, 2×2, 8×3 totals 30 cards; Usage stats show 9 of 10 archetype core cards present; No sideboard present
• Inferred: Hypergeometric opening-hand odds for each copy count; Control strategy and boss interaction read from guide text; Engine redundancy from distinct three-copy cards
• Provisional: Meta Power (null, no dated metagame sample); Format fit (D13) and matchup coverage; Median and floor output (no combo boards)
• Data gaps: 12 passcodes did not resolve to card names or text, so engine and interaction claims cannot be verified no combos supplied — combo floor/median/ceiling is text-only inference no tournament link — archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent archetype_core_group reports 24 core copies while exact-name purity is 0%; the two figures conflict and the core count was not relied on no win-rate telemetry exists in YGOVN, so going-first/second and matchup rates are Unknown Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied