DoomZ Deck #773410 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 60/100 (±7 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Stun, Tempo
• Format: master-duel

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Xyz pressure from the DoomZ/Power Patron Extra Deck (Jupiter 3500 ATK, DoomZ XII Drastrius 2700, Varudras 3000) and equip-driven Xyz chains through DoomZ Drastea and Elara; Recursive Xyz re-summons through DoomZ Break / XIII Over and Power Patron tutor-to-board lines
• Turn 1 (going first): Open a searcher (Amalthe, Medius, Power Patron DoomZ, Jupredo, Elara) to reach a 2-card Xyz bootstrap, using hand-trap protection on the follow-up Xyz
• Turn 2 (going second): Use Ash Blossom, Droll & Lock Bird, Ghost Ogre or Maxx C to stop the opponent's first engine, then rebuild a board from GY recursion and an equip-based Xyz
• Recovery: Recover through GY effects (Elara, Amalthe, Medius, Drastea) and the 18 searcher-text cards to rebuild the Xyz board after an interruption
• After siding: No side deck is run (side_count 0). Master Duel play is normally best-of-one, so there is no post-side plan to evaluate

Why it scores here

The deck reliably opens a functional plan: P(at least one searcher-text card in a going-first 5-card hand) is about 0.96, and the 35 archetype-core copies are all present. Its conversion is a real Xyz engine, with Jupiter, Varudras and Drastrius as closers. Floor and median output are unmeasured because the evidence contains no recorded boards, so both are text-only inference. Interruption resilience comes from eight hand traps (Ash Blossom, Droll, Ghost Ogre, Maxx C), which give a going-second hand a roughly 0.76 chance of holding one, plus GY recursion from Elara, Amalthe, Medius and Drastea. No side deck is run and no tournament or meta sample is supplied, so the score does not reflect popularity or meta-share, and card scores were not averaged into the deck score.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange. Structural ≈ 63.5, Going First ≈ 62, Going Second ≈ 64, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 61. Modifiers: No side deck (-2); Off-archetype dilution (-1). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers (Meta provisional; no dated metagame sample)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.96 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Searcher density (18 searcher-text cards) makes an opening hand very likely to find a starter
• Eight hand traps plus negation text give layered interaction on both turns
• Extra Deck closers with high ATK (Jupiter, Varudras, Drastrius) convert advantage into a win
• Full legal list: 40 main, 15 extra, Limited and Semi-Limited copy limits respected

Weaknesses

• No recorded boards, so the combo floor and median are unmeasured
• Only 43.6% exact-name archetype purity; off-theme cards dilute the engine
• No side deck, so the deck has no adaptability beyond its main deck
• Several Extra Deck Xyz need specific materials that the main deck does not reliably supply

Critical choke points

• Turn-1 starter: reaching a 2-card Xyz bootstrap depends on one of a few searchers or starters
• Hand-trap dependence: the opponent's first engine is stopped mainly by Ash, Droll, Ghost Ogre and Maxx C

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legal list: 40 main, 15 extra, 0 side; Maxx C (Limited, 1 copy) and Droll (Semi-Limited, 2 copies) within limits; Card stats and text for all 40 main and 15 Extra cards; Archetype usage stats: core present 18 of 25, with 7 core cards missing from this list
• Inferred: P(≥1 searcher in going-first hand) ≈ 0.96; P(≥1 hand trap in going-second hand) ≈ 0.76; Going-first and going-second scores from text and probability alone; Interaction quality from negation and removal text
• Provisional: Meta Power (null) and matchup fit (D13), since no dated metagame sample exists; Side adaptability (D12), since no post-side data exists and the format is normally best-of-one
• Data gaps: no combos supplied — combo floor/median/ceiling is text-only inference no tournament link — archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent no win-rate telemetry exists in YGOVN (going-first/second, matchup, game-level, brick/starter/OTK rates) — those signals are Inferred or Unknown Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied deck title is null, so the deck is identified only by its archetype and id