Azamina Deck #773292 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 25/100 (±10 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 12 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 2 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Tistina-engine board takeover: Tistina, the Divinity that Defies Darkness and Crystal God Tistina (Extra) flood the field with face-down or removed opposing cards, backed by Azamina fusions; Azamina Mu Rcielago / Saint Azamina ATK and DEF pressure once the Tistina board is established
• Turn 1 (going first): Open a Tistina starter (Sentinel, Fallen, Play, or Demigod) plus Ghost Belle or Forbidden Droplet for interaction, then extend into an Xyz or Link board
• Turn 2 (going second): Hand traps (Ash Blossom, Ghost Belle, Droll & Lock Bird, Nibiru) to break the opponent's starter, then rebuild through Tistina searches
• Recovery: Tistina and Azamina search effects from the Deck and GY (Miasma Dragon, Demigod, Breath of the Tistina, Deception of the Sinful Spoils) and GY revival (Fallen of the Tistina, Play of the Tistina)
• After siding: No Side Deck registered; no post-side plan can be evaluated

Why it scores here

The deck is Illegal as submitted: Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring is run 3 copies against an OCG limit of 2, and S:P Little Knight is run 2 copies against a limit of 1, so its structural score is capped and not treated as a normal final rating. The structural read still finds a Tistina-centred engine with an archetype core of 9 copies that has about a 74% chance of at least one core card in a 5-card opening hand, and a searcher-heavy text profile (15 cards) that keeps the engine reachable. Interaction is dense (9 hand traps, 8 negation texts, 11 removal texts), which supports the endboard and interaction scores. The deck is weak on reliability evidence: there are no recorded boards, so conversion and median output are text-only inferences, and the Deck has 49 of 40 cards off the exact Azamina name (5.8% exact-name purity), with a diffuse spread across Tistina, generic and Sinful Spoils cards. No side deck is registered, so post-side adaptability is scored very low. The score was not derived by averaging card scores, and the Azamina archetype's popularity does not count toward power.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 50, Going First ≈ 46, Going Second ≈ 42, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 40. Modifiers: Illegal copy-limit violations (-23). Final formula: Illegal cap: uncapped 0.80*Structural(50) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(40) = 48, capped to 25 because the list breaks copy limits; theoretical/structural-only read (Meta provisional)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.74 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.26 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Core engine reachable: 9 Tistina/Azamina-core copies give about 74% at least one in opening 5
• Dense interaction: 9 hand traps, 8 negation texts and 11 removal texts
• Searcher-heavy: 15 searcher-text cards keep the engine recoverable
• Extra Deck covers Xyz, Link and Fusion lines without a single point of failure

Weaknesses

• Illegal as submitted: copy-limit breaches on Ash Blossom and S:P Little Knight
• Low archetype purity (5.8% exact name) and a diffuse sub-archetype spread
• No side deck registered
• No recorded boards, so combo ceiling and floor are unmeasured

Critical choke points

• Tistina starter access: most lines need a Tistina monster or Spell/Trap to be live
• Opponent hand traps or board-breaking responses to the starter on turn 1

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: OCG copy-limit violations: Ash Blossom 3 vs 2 legal, S:P Little Knight 2 vs 1 legal; Main Deck 40 and Extra Deck 12 are within size rules; Exact-name purity 5.8%; sub-archetype spread from the composition block
• Inferred: At least one core card in opening 5 is about 0.74; Brick estimate about 0.26 on proxy; Interaction density read from card text; Conversion and median output are text-only estimates
• Provisional: Meta Power is null; no dated metagame sample; Tournament reliability is not grounded in tournament data; Post-side plan cannot be assessed
• Data gaps: No combos supplied; combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link; archetype meta-share and per-pilot record absent No win-rate telemetry for this deck (going-first, going-second, matchup, brick rates) No Side Deck registered Meta Power is Provisional without a dated metagame sample