Blue-Eyes Deck #773245 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 37/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 42 / Extra 14 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 2 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Blue-Eyes Ultimate Spirit Dragon, Neo Blue-Eyes Ultimate Dragon and Blue-Eyes Spirit Dragon via Blue-Eyes White Dragon and Sage/Maiden/Wishes search lines (Inferred, text-only); Albion, Mirrorjade and Lubellion via Fallen of Albaz fusion lines (Inferred)
• Turn 1 (going first): Normal Summon Sage with Eyes of Blue or Maiden of White, search a Tuner or Wishes for Eyes of Blue into a Blue-Eyes engine (Inferred)
• Turn 2 (going second): Hold Ash Blossom, Infinite Impermanence, Effect Veiler, Nibiru and Droll & Lock Bird to interact with the opponent's first summons, then rebuild through Blue-Eyes White Dragon (Inferred)
• Recovery: Recur via Maiden of White from GY when Blue-Eyes White Dragon is Special Summoned, and re-search with Sage or Wishes (Inferred)
• After siding: Not assessable: the deck has 0 Side Deck cards, so no post-side plan exists in the export

Why it scores here

This list is scored as a theoretical, structural-only read because it is Illegal: Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring is run 3 times against a limit of 2, and Kashtira Fenrir is run 3 times while Forbidden. On the system, it reliably opens a Blue-Eyes starter through triple Sage, Maiden and Wishes, and it has 13 hand traps and 10 negation-text cards to answer early plays, which is the main source of its interaction score. Its ceiling is high because the Extra Deck holds Neo Blue-Eyes, Blue-Eyes Ultimate Spirit and Stardust Sifr, but no recorded boards exist, so floor and median are text-only inferences. Points were lost for a 19.6% exact-archetype purity spread across Primite, Albaz, Kashtira, Bystial, Dogmatika and Greed, the dead Forbidden copies, the absence of any Side Deck, and three competing Extra Deck engines. Archetype popularity and usage stats confirm the list is real, but they did not add points, and card scores were not averaged into the deck score.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange primary, Toolbox secondary (mainly D1-D7 weights); no Toolbox blend applied in structural score. Structural ≈ 55, Going First ≈ 50, Going Second ≈ 52, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 25. Modifiers: banlist_exposure (-8); engine_conflicts (-4). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers (Meta provisional; Illegal list, theoretical/structural-only)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.99 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Triple hand-trap and negation coverage (Ash, Imperm, Veiler, Nibiru, Droll)
• Strong Extra Deck closers (Neo Blue-Eyes 4500, Blue-Eyes Ultimate Spirit 3500, Cosmic Blazar 4000)
• Multiple searchers and recursion through Sage, Maiden and Wishes

Weaknesses

• Illegal list: Ash over limit and Forbidden Kashtira Fenrir x3
• No Side Deck, so no best-of-3 adaptation
• Low exact-archetype purity (19.6%) with three competing Extra Deck engines

Critical choke points

• Blue-Eyes White Dragon is run only 2 copies, so the Blue-Eyes engine depends on the Sage/Maiden/Wishes chain to reach it
• Ash Blossom and the Majesty/True Light line share the same hand-trap-or-search slots

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality: Kashtira Fenrir Forbidden x3, Ash Blossom Semi-Limited x3 against limit 2; Main 42 / Extra 14 / Side 0 counts and archetype purity 19.6%; Card text and stats of listed cards
• Observed: Usage stats: Blue-Eyes core inclusion (Sage 88.7%, Maiden 83.0%, Mausoleum 92.2%)
• Inferred: Opening-hand consistency P(>=1 starter) 0.99 for core group (hypergeometric); Going-first/second plans, brick estimate and interaction quality read from text
• Provisional: Meta Power (null) and format fit (D13)
• Data gaps: no combos supplied — combo floor/median/ceiling is text-only inference no tournament link — archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent no win-rate telemetry exists in YGOVN (going-first/second, matchup, game-level, brick/starter/OTK rates) — those signals are Inferred or Unknown Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied Side deck is empty, so post-side performance cannot be assessed Deck list is Illegal, so the score is theoretical/structural-only