Azamina Deck #773229 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 25/100 (±10 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Toolbox
• Secondary strategies: Stun, Midrange
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 55 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 4 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Extra Deck boards from Fiendsmith, Magical Musket and Unchained link/fusion monsters, plus Mulcharmy draw pressure, with no single reliable Azamina line; Fiendsmith's Rextremende / Sea Monster / Nibiru board pressure if the opening hand finds an enabler
• Turn 1 (going first): Open a Mulcharmy or Fiendsmith starter with hand traps held up; the list has no engine that clearly converts T1 without Azamina core cards
• Turn 2 (going second): Use Ash Blossom, Ghost Ogre, Droll & Lock Bird, Maxx C and Red Reboot to disrupt the opponent's first board, then rebuild through Musket or Fiendsmith searchers
• Recovery: Mulcharmy draw effects and searchers (Engraver, Tract, Doc, Max) refill cards, but the lack of a unified engine makes recovery uneven
• After siding: Not applicable: the deck has no Side Deck, so there is no post-side plan

Why it scores here

The score is driven by the deck as a system, not by its card scores or by Azamina's popularity. Consistency is weakened because the core Azamina engine is absent (0 exact-name copies, 0 of 6 missing top-core cards present) and the 70 off-archetype copies span Magical Musket, Fiendsmith, Mulcharmy, Solemn and others, so starters are not redundant along a single line. Interaction is the strongest area: 16 negation and 20 removal text hits, 8 hand traps, and strong going-second disruption. Conversion is unmeasured because no combos were supplied, so ceiling and median are text-only inference and are scored low. Two Forbidden cards (D/D/D Wave High King Caesar and Triple Tactics Talent) make the list illegal in OCG, and the deck has no Side Deck, so the result is capped low and labelled theoretical. Archetype usage data confirms the real list is far from the standard core, and this did not earn any points.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange primary (about 80%) with Stun secondary weighting for D7. Structural ≈ 45, Going First ≈ 35, Going Second ≈ 45, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 35. Modifiers: Illegal: Forbidden cards present (-8); No Side Deck (-2); Engine conflict across sub-archetypes (-2); Illegal cap to low band (-6). Final formula: No reliable metagame: 0.80*Structural(45.3) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(35) = 43.2, then context modifiers (total -12, clamped) = 31, then Illegal cap applied = 25 (theoretical/structural-only)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.25 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Layered interaction: 16 negation and 20 removal text hits with 8 hand traps
• Strong going-second disruption from hand traps at about 0.63 P(>=1 in hand 6)
• Extra Deck covers Link, Fusion and XYZ across three engines

Weaknesses

• Illegal in OCG because of two Forbidden cards
• Core Azamina cards are absent (0 of 6 top-core cards present)
• Fragmented engines across Musket, Fiendsmith, Mulcharmy and Solemn
• No Side Deck
• No combo data to confirm conversion

Critical choke points

• Starters for each engine are 3 copies or fewer, so P(>=1 starter in 5 cards) is about 0.25
• Forbidden cards cannot be played, so any list containing them is illegal in OCG

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Illegal status: Forbidden D/D/D Wave High King Caesar and Triple Tactics Talent in OCG; Composition: 55 Main, 15 Extra, 0 Side; Extra breakdown Link 7, Fusion 7, XYZ 1; 0 exact-name Azamina copies; 70 off-archetype copies; Usage: Azamina core cards absent (0 of 6 top-core cards present)
• Observed: No combos observed: combos_evidence total_combos 0
• Inferred: Starter consistency about 0.25 for 3-copy engine cards (hypergeometric); Interaction quality from card text (16 negation, 20 removal); Going-second disruption from 8 hand traps at about 0.63; Brick risk and conversion from composition and text
• Provisional: Meta Power (null, no dated meta sample); Matchup and format fit (no tournament link)
• Data gaps: no combos supplied; combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference no tournament link; archetype meta-share and per-pilot record absent no win-rate telemetry; going-first and going-second splits are Inferred Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied deck title is null