Tri-Brigade Deck #773116 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG
56 Main, 15 Extra, incl. Fire King Courtier Ulcanix x3, Fire King High Avatar Kirin x3, Mulcharmy Fuwalos x3. Created Oct 21, 2026 by YGO Mod.
Created by: YGO Mod (20517634)
Created On: 10/21/2026
Main Deck (56)
- Droll & Lock Bird x1
- Fire King Avatar Arvata x1
- Fire King Avatar Rangbali x1
- Fire King Courtier Ulcanix x3
- Fire King High Avatar Garunix x1
- Fire King High Avatar Kirin x3
- Legendary Fire King Ponix x1
- Mulcharmy Fuwalos x3
- Mulcharmy Purulia x3
- Sacred Fire King Garunix x3
- Tri-Brigade Fraktall x3
- Tri-Brigade Kerass x1
- Tri-Brigade Kitt x3
- Tri-Brigade Nervall x1
- Tri-Brigade Springans Kitt x1
- Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring x3
- Ghost Ogre & Snow Rabbit x3
- Fire Formation - Tenki x3
- Fire King Island x1
- Fire King Sanctuary x1
- Fire King Sky Burn x1
- Harpie's Feather Duster x1
- Pot of Sloth x3
- The Fallen & The Virtuous x3
- Evenly Matched x3
- Solemn Judgment x1
- Solemn Warning x3
- Tri-Brigade Revolt x1
Extra Deck (15)
- The Dragon that Devours the Dogma x1
- Ancient Warriors Oath - Double Dragon Lords x1
- Hiita the Fire Charmer, Ablaze x1
- Promethean Princess, Bestower of Flames x1
- S:P Little Knight x1
- Salamangreat Almiraj x1
- Tri-Brigade Arms Mouser x1
- Tri-Brigade Bearbrumm the Rampant Rampager x1
- Tri-Brigade Ferrijit the Barren Blossom x1
- Tri-Brigade Rugal the Silver Sheller x1
- Tri-Brigade Shuraig the Ominous Omen x2
- Yummy★Snatchy x1
- Ecclesia and the Dark Dragon x1
- Garunix Eternity, Hyang of the Fire Kings x1
Couldn't load the deck
Deck — Deck Power Evaluation
Final Contextual Deck Power: 25/100 (±8 · Confidence: Medium)
| Overall score | Value |
|---|---|
| Structural Deck Power | 38 |
| Going First | 40 |
| Going Second | 45 |
| Meta Power | provisional |
| Tournament Reliability | 30 |
- Primary strategy: Midrange
- Secondary strategies: Toolbox, Stun
- Format: ocg
Legality
Main 56 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 3 violation(s).
Identity & game plan
- Win condition: Tri-Brigade and Fire King link/Xyz boss monsters (Shuraig, Rugal, Garunix Eternity) built from banished or GY Beast-type monsters; Sacred Fire King Garunix and Fire King High Avatar Garunix as board-wipe and recursion pressure
- Turn 1 (going first): Open on Fire King and Tri-Brigade starters plus Mulcharmy draw engine; hold Ash Blossom, Droll and Solemn for the first opposing Summon or activation
- Turn 2 (going second): Six-card hand with a hand trap (about 71% at least one in hand 6) to stop the opponent's starter, then rebuild through Tri-Brigade links from the GY
- Recovery: Recycle Beast-type monsters from the GY into Tri-Brigade Link Summons; Fire King Island and Sanctuary restore the field-zone engine if it is removed
- After siding: Not evaluable: the deck runs no Side Deck cards
Why it scores here
The deck is scored as a system and not as an average of its card scores. Its Structural score is about 38, held down by the fact that it runs three archetype engines (Fire King, Tri-Brigade, Mulcharmy) plus a Branded/Albaz/Ecclesia package that cannot function as built. Engine access is moderate: 3-copy starters have about a 25% chance of appearing in the opening 5, and the 5-copy archetype core has about a 39% chance. Interaction is the strongest area, with 10 hand traps and several floodgate-style negates giving about a 71% chance of a hand trap in a going-second 6-card hand. Floor and median output are unmeasured (no recorded boards), so the ceiling is text-only and not reported as typical play. Popularity did not earn points: the Tri-Brigade usage stat confirms the list is real but does not add to power. The deck is Illegal (three Semi-Limited cards at 3 copies), so the final score is capped at 25 and the evaluation is theoretical and structural only.
Dimension scores
| # | Dimension | Score | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Engine Accessibility & Consistency | 35 | P(at least one 3-copy starter in 5-card hand) = 0.249; P(at least one of 5 archetype core copies) = 0.385; starter density is spread across three archetypes (Inferred) |
| D2 | Opening-Hand Quality & Brick Management | 40 | Copy histogram is 14 singletons and 14 triples; about 30% of main-deck cards are Level 0 spells and traps; 10 hand traps compete for hand slots (Inferred) |
| D3 | Combo Conversion & Ceiling | 30 | No parseable recorded boards; ceiling is text-only, from Tri-Brigade link chains and Garunix Xyz (Inferred) |
| D4 | Combo Floor & Median Output | 28 | combos_evidence is empty (total_combos 0), so the median is unmeasured; no floor can be stated (Provisional) |
| D5 | Interruption Resilience & Route Redundancy | 35 | Several independent lines (Tri-Brigade GY link, Fire King Island and Sanctuary, Mulcharmy draw) but the Albaz/Ecclesia package has no Fallen of Albaz monster to start it (Inferred) |
| D6 | Resource Economy, Recovery & Grind | 40 | Mulcharmy Fuwalos and Purulia draw on opponent summons and Pot of Sloth gives card draw; recursion from the GY is textual (Inferred) |
| D7 | End-Board & Interaction Quality | 60 | 10 hand traps plus Harpie's Feather Duster, Solemn Judgment and Droll and Lock Bird; quality strong but layering reduced by the over-limit triples (Verified legality + Inferred) |
| D8 | Going-Second & Board-Breaking Power | 55 | Going-second hand-trap probability 0.71 and Garunix board wipe text; no going-second combo split is recorded (Inferred) |
| D9 | Offensive Pressure & Closing Power | 45 | Garunix Eternity (3000 ATK), Shuraig (3000 ATK), Garunix High Avatar (2700 ATK) provide boss pressure; direct-attack text is limited (Verified stats + Inferred) |
| D10 | Main Deck Efficiency & Flexibility | 40 | 56 Main Deck cards with 28 distinct names; archetype exact-name purity is 21.1%, so the Main Deck is compositionally diffuse (Verified composition + Inferred) |
| D11 | Extra Deck Efficiency & Coverage | 40 | 15 Extra Deck cards: 12 Link, 1 Xyz, 1 Fusion, 1 Synchro; The Dragon that Devours the Dogma and Ecclesia and the Dark Dragon have no enabling Fallen of Albaz in the Main Deck (Verified list + Inferred) |
| D12 | Side Deck Adaptability | 5 | No Side Deck cards at all, so there is no post-side adaptation (Verified) |
| D13 | Matchup Coverage & Format Fit | 30 | No tournament link or meta-share context; matchup fit cannot be measured and is Provisional |
| D14 | Pilotability & Error Tolerance | 25 | Three archetypes plus an unsupported Albaz package create many branch decisions and conflicting engines; error tolerance is low (Inferred) |
How the score was computed
Strategy profile: Midrange. Structural ≈ 38, Going First ≈ 40, Going Second ≈ 45, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 30. Modifiers: banlist exposure (-4); engine conflict / dead package (-3); illegal-deck cap (-4). Final formula: 0.80*Structural(38) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(30) = 36.4; context modifiers -7 gives 29.4; Illegal-deck cap applied to 25 (theoretical/structural only; Meta provisional)
Couldn't load the combos
