Dogmatika Deck #773102 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 35/100 (±5 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Midrange, Toolbox
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 56 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 4 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Fusion Summon Level 8 Fusion boss monsters (Granguignol, The Dragon that Devours the Dogma, Titaniklad) from the Extra Deck, enabled by Fallen of Albaz as the central Fusion material.; Synchro and Xyz bosses (The Three Champions of Swordsoul, Ecclesia and the Dark Dragon, Raidraptor - Arsenal Falcon) once Fusion or Synchro material is in the Graveyard.
• Turn 1 (going first): Opening Fallen of Albaz or Fallen of the White Dragon plus Branded Fusion or Super Polymerization into a Level 8 Fusion boss, supported by searchers (Nadir Servant, Dogmatika Ecclesia, Branded Opening) for a second starter.
• Turn 2 (going second): Hold Ash Blossom, Ghost Ogre and Droll & Lock Bird, plus Solemn Judgment and Solemn Warning, to stop the opponent's first summon or search, then rebuild a Fusion boss from the Graveyard or banish zone.
• Recovery: Recur Fallen of Albaz and Fusion or Synchro material from the Graveyard through Blazing Cartesia, Guiding Quem and Mulcharmy Fuwalos draws, and re-Fusion the boss.
• After siding: Not evaluable: the deck has no Side Deck, so there is no post-side plan.

Why it scores here

The score is built from the deck as a system, not from its cards. The engine reliably opens a Fallen of Albaz line (searcher density of about 83 percent in a 5-card hand, Inferred) and converts it into Level 8 Fusion bosses with 2500 to 3800 ATK. Interaction is dense: 13 hand traps and 9 negation-text cards give a strong going-second read (about 81 percent to hold at least one hand trap in 6 cards, Inferred). Weaknesses are a high brick and redundancy cost (25 Level 0 spells and traps, 19 tech cards, 29 distinct main-deck cards with only 2.8 percent exact Dogmatika purity), zero side deck, and no combo data to measure a real median. Popularity did not earn points: Dogmatika core inclusion is only 50 percent. The Illegal status (forbidden Kashtira Fenrir and three over-limit cards) caps the final score, so this is a structural-only reading.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 55.2, Going First ≈ 50, Going Second ≈ 55, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 45. Modifiers: banlist_exposure (-12). Final formula: Illegal deck: formula 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability = 0.80*55.2 + 0.20*45 = 53.2, then capped to 35 with a -12 banlist modifier applied (Meta provisional)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.25 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dense going-second interaction: 13 hand traps and 9 negation-text cards
• Multiple Level 8 Fusion bosses with 2500 to 3800 ATK
• Searcher density gives a second starter in most hands

Weaknesses

• Illegal list: forbidden Kashtira Fenrir and three over-limit cards
• High brick and tech load, with 25 Level 0 spells and traps
• Zero side deck, so no post-side adaptability
• No combo, tournament or matchup data to measure a real median

Critical choke points

• Fallen of Albaz or Fallen of the White Dragon as the single Fusion material route
• Forbidden Kashtira Fenrir: the deck cannot be made legal without removing it

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Illegal status: Kashtira Fenrir Forbidden and three cards over copy limit; Main 56 and Extra 15 are within the OCG size rules; Extra Deck breakdown: 12 Fusion, 2 Synchro, 1 Xyz; Card text excerpts for the Fallen of Albaz and Solemn engines
• Inferred: Searcher access at about 0.83 in a 5-card hand; Going-second hand-trap coverage at about 0.81; Brick and redundancy load from tech and Level 0 counts
• Provisional: Meta and format fit (no dated metagame sample); Matchup performance
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and pilot record are absent No win-rate telemetry for going-first, going-second, matchup or brick rates Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied