Blue-Eyes Deck #773012 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 30/100 (±8 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Stun
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 56 / Extra 16 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 3 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Blue-Eyes White Dragon and Blue-Eyes extra-deck boss monsters (Blue-Eyes Spirit Dragon, Blue-Eyes Tyrant Dragon, Blue-Eyes Jet Dragon) attacking after the board is stabilised; Hand-trap-protected Synchro and Fusion boards built from Sage, Maiden of White and Wishes for Eyes of Blue
• Turn 1 (going first): Normal Summon Sage or Maiden of White, search a Blue-Eyes piece with Wishes or Master, then build a Synchro or Fusion board while protecting it with Ash Blossom, Droll & Lock Bird and Effect Veiler
• Turn 2 (going second): Use the six-card hand to hand-trap the opponent's first summon (Ash Blossom, Effect Veiler, Infinite Impermanence, Nibiru, Contact "C") and rebuild through Mulcharmy draws
• Recovery: Recover Eyes-of-Blue Tuners from the Graveyard with Master with Eyes of Blue and Sage, then re-enter the Blue-Eyes White Dragon line
• After siding: Not evaluable: the deck has no Side Deck, so no post-side plan exists in the evidence

Why it scores here

The deck reliably opens an archetype starter: about 96% of 5-card openers contain at least one core Blue-Eyes card, and three Tuner searchers plus Wishes give it a bootstrap (Inferred). Its interaction density is high, with 11 hand traps and 9 negation-text cards, so it can protect a Synchro or Fusion line on either turn (Inferred). Conversion is capped by the missing core extra-deck bosses (Blue-Eyes Ultimate Spirit, Neo Blue-Eyes Ultimate, Stardust Sifr, Crimson Dragon, Hieratic Seal) and by the absence of recorded boards, so the ceiling and median are text-only estimates. Score is held down by legality: a Semi-Limited card is run three times, the Extra Deck is one card over the limit, and there is no Side Deck. Popularity (Blue-Eyes core present in the usage table) confirms the list is a real build but did not earn points, and card scores were not averaged into the deck score.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 54, Going First ≈ 55, Going Second ≈ 58, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 40. Modifiers: Illegal copy limit (-6); Extra Deck over size (-3); No side deck (-3). Final formula: 0.80*Structural(54) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(40) = 51.2, plus modifiers -12 = 39.2, then capped to 30 because the list is Illegal (theoretical/structural-only); Meta Provisional

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.96 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Archetype core is present in about 96% of 5-card openers (Inferred)
• 11 hand traps and 9 negation-text cards give layered interaction (Inferred)
• Blue-Eyes White Dragon and three Blue-Eyes Spirit Dragons give a real closing route (Verified card text)

Weaknesses

• Illegal in the OCG format: Ash Blossom is over the copy limit and the Extra Deck is over by one (Verified)
• No Side Deck, so no post-side plan (Verified)
• Only 22.2% of the Main Deck is exact Blue-Eyes names, which lowers engine coherence (Verified)
• Core Extra-Deck bosses are missing from the list (Verified usage gap)

Critical choke points

• Blue-Eyes White Dragon count is 2, so the main extender is thin on the first summon (Verified)
• The Extra Deck is over its limit, so one boss must be removed before the list can be played (Verified)

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Illegal status: Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring runs 3 copies against an OCG limit of 2; Extra Deck is 16 against a maximum of 15; Side Deck is 0; Exact-name archetype purity is 22.2%
• Observed: Blue-Eyes core usage is present in the usage table (usage stats, not deck power)
• Inferred: Starter consistency from hypergeometric probabilities; Interaction quality from hand-trap and negation text; Going-first and going-second estimates
• Provisional: Meta Power and format-fit (D13) need a dated metagame sample
• Data gaps: no combos supplied — combo floor/median/ceiling is text-only inference no tournament link — archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent no win-rate telemetry exists in YGOVN — going-first/second, matchup, brick and starter rates are Inferred or Unknown Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied Deck has no title (Deck.Title is null)