Maliss Deck #772978 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

40 Main, 15 Extra, incl. Imsety, Glory of Horus x3, Maliss Chessy Cat x3, Maliss March Hare x3. Created Oct 21, 2026 by YGO Mod.

Deck Maliss OCG

Created by: YGO Mod (20517634)

Created On: 10/21/2026

 
 


Official AI Deck Power Analysis
ComboConfidence: Low
30± 10/ 100
Power Score
Structural 45
Reliability 40
Going First 42
Going Second 36

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 30/100 (±10 · Confidence: Low)

Overall score Value
Structural Deck Power 45
Going First 42
Going Second 36
Meta Power provisional
Tournament Reliability 40
  • Primary strategy: Combo
  • Secondary strategies: Toolbox, Midrange
  • Format: ocg

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 1 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

  • Win condition: Maliss Link Monster board (Red Ransom, Evil★Twin's Trouble Sunny, Hearts Crypter absent) for end-board pressure; Horus / Ashtra Special Summon-from-GY and hand lines (Imsety, Akasuna, Ashtraya Mikumari-no-Mikoto) as a secondary board
  • Turn 1 (going first): Maliss March Hare / Chessy Cat searches into Link Summon of a Maliss Link; no combo steps were supplied, so this is an unverified reading of card text
  • Turn 2 (going second): Ash Blossom (3 copies, illegal as built) and Maliss traps as the only interaction; no recorded going-second boards
  • Recovery: Maliss in Underground and Maliss MTP-07 / TB-11 recover Maliss monsters from GY or banish; text-only read, Inferred
  • After siding: Not evaluable: side deck is empty (0 cards), so no post-side plan exists in the evidence

Why it scores here

This deck is scored as a system and is Illegal as built: it runs 3 copies of Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring against a Semi-Limited limit of 2, so the result is theoretical/structural only and not a normal Final Contextual score. The Maliss core is real and accessible: the archetype core group has about 82% chance of at least one copy in a 5-card opening hand (Inferred), and the 3-copy Maliss starters (March Hare, Chessy Cat) each appear in about 34% of going-first openings. Consistency is held back by the mix: only 15 of 40 main-deck cards are the exact Maliss name, the rest are Ashtra, Horus, Live☆Twin, Bystial and Code Talker pieces, and 14 of 25 distinct main cards are singletons. No recorded boards, combo medians or going-second splits exist, so floor, median and ceiling are text-only Inferred reads and the ceiling is not reported as the average. The side deck is empty, so adaptability is scored at a low provisional value. Popularity signals (Maliss usage is high) confirm the archetype is real, but they did not earn any points by themselves, and card scores were not averaged.

Dimension scores

# Dimension Score Evidence
D1 Engine Accessibility & Consistency 55 P(≥1 archetype-core copy in hand5) ≈ 0.82; 3-copy starters ≈ 0.34 each; brick risk from mixed sub-archetypes (Inferred)
D2 Opening-Hand Quality & Brick Management 45 14 singleton main cards and three different hand-trap / Ash lines compete for hand space; 3 Ash copies also break legality (Inferred)
D3 Combo Conversion & Ceiling 40 No parseable boards; ceiling is a text-only read of Maliss Link loops and Ashtra recursion (Inferred)
D4 Combo Floor & Median Output 35 No median output data; floor unknown without recorded boards (Provisional)
D5 Interruption Resilience & Route Redundancy 50 Independent Maliss and Horus/Ashtra lines give some redundancy, but Maliss traps and Ashtra/Horus lines depend on the same Link/Synchro bases (Inferred)
D6 Resource Economy, Recovery & Grind 45 Maliss in Underground and Maliss MTP-07 provide search and recursion by text; no resource data (Inferred)
D7 End-Board & Interaction Quality 55 14 removal-text and 6 negation-text cards plus Ash x3 and two Maliss traps; interaction breadth is real but Ash count is illegal (Inferred)
D8 Going-Second & Board-Breaking Power 35 Only 3 hand traps, and no going-second boards recorded; Horus Special Summon from GY is the main board-breaker read (Inferred)
D9 Offensive Pressure & Closing Power 50 Link-based end boards (Red Ransom 2300 ATK, Sunny 3300 ATK) and Ashtraja Susanoo 3300 ATK give closing power on paper (Verified stats, Inferred use)
D10 Main Deck Efficiency & Flexibility 40 25 distinct main cards, purity 27.3% exact-name, several off-archetype singletons (Verified counts)
D11 Extra Deck Efficiency & Coverage 50 11 Link, 2 XYZ, 2 Synchro; Extra Deck mixes Evil★Twin, Maliss, Ashtra and Kuriboh routes; Hearts Crypter (core 97.6%) is absent (Verified usage, Inferred use)
D12 Side Deck Adaptability 20 Side deck is empty; no post-side data (Provisional)
D13 Matchup Coverage & Format Fit 40 No tournament link or dated meta; archetype core usage is 25 of 40-ish core cards present at 32% (Provisional)
D14 Pilotability & Error Tolerance 35 Four or more sub-archetype lines and many singletons raise decision load; no step data to judge error tolerance (Inferred)

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 45, Going First ≈ 42, Going Second ≈ 36, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 40. Modifiers: banlist exposure (-5); illegal_cap (-9). Final formula: Illegal cap applied: base 0.80*45 + 0.20*40 = 44, then banlist exposure -5 and capped to 30 as theoretical/structural only (Meta provisional)


More OCG Info

Maliss

Maliss Breakdown

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 
https://metaduelist.com/
Top