Azamina Deck #772969 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 29/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Stun, Toolbox
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 53 / Extra 17 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 3 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Azamina Fusion/Synchro Extra Deck boss (Azamina, Saint Azamina, Diabellze/Diabellstar 2500 ATK bodies) reached through Sinful Spoils and White Forest engine plays; Sinful Spoils and Diabell recursion grinding out card advantage over a long game
• Turn 1 (going first): Open a White Forest or Azamina starter (Elzette, Silvy, Tales, Hallowed Azamina) and use Diabellstar / Mulcharmy for draw and bodies while holding Ash Blossom and Infinite Impermanence up as interaction
• Turn 2 (going second): Six-card hand with 8 hand traps (P≥1 hand trap ≈ 0.65 going second) to stop the opponent's first starter, then rebuild through Sinful Spoils and Diabell recursion
• Recovery: Recursion from the GY via Sinful Spoils Spells/Traps, Ghost Belle, Rciela and Poplar in the Extra Deck, and Pot of Sloth/Mulcharmy draws
• After siding: Not evaluable: the deck has no side deck (side_count 0)

Why it scores here

The deck is Illegal as submitted: Ash Blossom is run 3 times against a 2-copy limit, WANTED is run 3 times against a 1-copy Limited cap, and the Extra Deck holds 17 cards against a 15-card OCG maximum, so it is capped and the score reflects structure only. Its archetype core (The Hallowed Azamina, Mulcharmy Fuwalos, Ash Blossom, Diabellstar, Deception of the Sinful Spoils) has about an 0.80 chance of at least one copy in a 5-card opening hand (Inferred). Its power would come from the Azamina/Sinful Spoils/White Forest/Diabell system, with 8 hand traps and 13 negation-text cards giving it real interaction, scored on the deck as a whole rather than by averaging card scores. The list is only 14 of its distinct cards in the Azamina core (exact-name purity 10%), so the Mulcharmy and generic staple spells dilute engine coherence and raise brick risk. No recorded boards, tournament link, or side deck exist, so floor, median, and meta are unsupported, and popularity of the Azamina archetype earned no points.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: 70% Combo / 30% Stun (secondary for the 8 hand traps and negation density). Structural ≈ 42.7, Going First ≈ 40, Going Second ≈ 45, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 35. Modifiers: Illegal deck cap (-12). Final formula: Illegal deck cap: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers = 0.80*42.7 + 0.20*35 - 12 ≈ 29 (Meta provisional, theoretical/structural-only)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.8 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Strong Extra Deck closers (Azamina, Saint Azamina, Diabell Queen, Chaos Angel) with broad recursion via Sinful Spoils
• Eight hand traps and several negation effects give real going-second interaction
• Core archetype cards have about an 0.80 chance of appearing in a 5-card opening hand

Weaknesses

• Illegal as submitted: copy-limit violations and an oversized Extra Deck
• No side deck, so no post-side adaptation
• Mulcharmy and generic staples dilute the Azamina engine (exact-name purity 10%)
• Heavy non-monster main deck (29 Spells/Traps) raises brick and dead-card risk

Critical choke points

• Opening hand needs a starter plus interaction; Quick-Play and tech cards may be dead without a live engine
• Extra Deck overage must be removed before the list is playable
• Ash Blossom and WANTED copy overages must be cut to legal counts

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality: Ash Blossom 3 vs 2 legal copies, WANTED 3 vs 1 legal copy, Extra Deck 17 > 15; Main deck 53 cards, Extra Deck 17, Side deck 0; Core-group P(≥1 in opening 5) = 0.7994 and hand-trap P(≥1 in 6) = 0.6452 from the supplied hypergeometric table; Archetype exact-name purity 10% (7 of 70 Azamina-tagged copies)
• Observed: Usage statistics: The Hallowed Azamina (72%), Mulcharmy Fuwalos (69%), Ash Blossom (65%) are archetype core inclusions
• Inferred: Going-first and going-second plans and the consistency estimate from hypergeometric draws; Interaction density from card text (8 hand traps, 13 negation-text cards); Brick risk from 29 Spells/Traps and the Quick-Play/tech density; Going-second hand-trap coverage
• Provisional: Meta Power (null) and matchup fit (D13) because no dated metagame sample is supplied
• Data gaps: no combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference no tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent no side deck: post-side plan and D12 cannot be scored no win-rate telemetry: going-first, going-second, matchup and brick rates are Inferred or Unknown Meta Power is Provisional without a dated metagame sample title is null in the deck export