Lunalight Deck #772965 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 30/100 (±10 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox, Stun
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 4 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Fusion Summon Lunalight Fusion Monsters (Leo, Cat, Panther, Sabre Dancers) from the Extra Deck, using Lunalight monsters from hand or field, then attack through the boards of the opponent; Link and Xyz pressure (S:P Little Knight, Outer Entity Nyarla) as a fallback when Fusion routes are stopped
• Turn 1 (going first): Lunalight Masquerade or Gold Leo search, then Polymerization or Lunalight Fusion into a Dancer; Ash Blossom and Infinite Impermanence held to protect the line
• Turn 2 (going second): Hand traps (Ash Blossom, Droll & Lock Bird, Infinite Impermanence) answer the opponent's first search or summon, then recover a Lunalight through the GY to restart the Fusion route
• Recovery: Lunalight Perfume and Yellow Marten retrieve monsters from the GY or banish, and Lunalight Silver Hound and Emerald Bird can revive a Level 4 or lower Lunalight
• After siding: Not evaluable: the deck runs no Side Deck, so no post-side plan exists in the evidence

Why it scores here

The deck is scored as a system, not as an average of its card scores. Its Lunalight core is very reliable to access: the archetype core group shows a 99.8% chance of at least one core card in the opening hand, and searcher text covers 97% of hands, so the engine usually goes live on turns one and two. Interaction is dense (eight hand traps, twelve negation-text cards, eleven removal-text cards), and the Fusion Dancers give real closing pressure. The score is held down by the legality cap: Ash Blossom and Droll exceed their copy limits and Called by the Grave and Cross-Sheep are Forbidden in OCG, so this list cannot be played as built and the result is theoretical and structural only. There are no recorded boards, so the ceiling and median are text-only inference, and there is no side deck and no dated meta sample, so post-side and matchup dimensions are provisional. Popularity was not credited: the archetype usage data confirms the list is real, but it earned no points by itself.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 63, Going First ≈ 60, Going Second ≈ 58, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 45. Modifiers: banlist_exposure (-12); incomplete_combo_evidence (0). Final formula: Structural 62.65 (Combo profile). No-meta formula: 0.80*62.65 + 0.20*45 = 59.1, then banlist and copy-limit modifier -12 gives 47. Illegal deck: capped to 30 and labelled theoretical or structural-only, so no normal Final score applies.

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.97 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Archetype core and searcher density make the engine live on turns one and two
• Layered interaction from hand traps and negation or removal text
• Extra Deck holds high-ATK Fusion finishers with second-attack text

Weaknesses

• Illegal as built: copy limits and two Forbidden cards must be fixed before the list can be played
• Fusion-enabler singletons (Polymerization, Lunalight Fusion) create conversion risk
• No side deck, so no post-side adaptability

Critical choke points

• Polymerization and Lunalight Fusion as the only fusion enablers
• Extra Deck fusion materials, which depend on Lunalight monsters surviving in hand or field
• Dependence on a Lunalight monster surviving a single opposing sweep

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality: 40 main, 15 extra, 0 side; copy-limit violations and Forbidden cards listed in the evidence; Composition: type, attribute and race spread; 22 distinct main and 12 distinct extra cards; Archetype usage: core inclusion rates from the usage statistics
• Observed: Usage statistics show 16 of 25 core cards present in this list
• Inferred: Starter access and brick rate from the hypergeometric estimates; Interaction quality from card text; no recorded boards exist; Going-first and going-second estimates from text and composition
• Provisional: Meta Power, which is null without a dated metagame sample; Matchup fit and tournament reliability, which are scored without meta data
• Data gaps: No combos supplied, so combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link, so archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record are absent No win-rate telemetry exists in YGOVN, so going-first, going-second and matchup results are Inferred or Unknown Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied No side deck, so post-side performance cannot be measured