Blue-Eyes Deck #772880 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 30/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Control
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 41 / Extra 14 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 2 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Blue-Eyes Ultimate Spirit Dragon, Neo Blue-Eyes Ultimate Dragon, Blue-Eyes Chaos MAX Dragon and Blue-Eyes Tyrant Dragon, all reached through Blue-Eyes White Dragon-based Extra Deck summons (text read, Inferred); Dragon Master Magia and Stardust Sifr as high-ATK closers once the board is cleared (text read, Inferred)
• Turn 1 (going first): Normal Summon Sage with Eyes of Blue or Maiden of White, search or summon Blue-Eyes White Dragon, then move into an Extra Deck boss (Inferred)
• Turn 2 (going second): Hold Ash Blossom, Effect Veiler and Infinite Impermanence to stop the opponent's board, then Majesty of the White Dragons or Ultimate Fusion to clear and rebuild (Inferred)
• Recovery: Wishes for Eyes of Blue and The Melody of Awakening Dragon search Blue-Eyes pieces back to hand; Mausoleum of White supplies extra Normal Summons (Inferred)
• After siding: None: side deck is empty (0 cards), so there is no post-side plan

Why it scores here

The deck opens a Blue-Eyes engine reliably enough through searchers: P(at least one searcher-text card in a 5-card opening hand) is about 0.81, but P(at least one Blue-Eyes White Dragon in 5) is only about 0.23 with just 2 copies. Its interaction suite (Ash Blossom, Effect Veiler, Infinite Impermanence, Nibiru, Majesty) gives it real going-second resilience and end-board control, and its Extra Deck closers (Chaos MAX, Neo Blue-Eyes, Ultimate Spirit, Tyrant) give high closing power. The score comes from consistency, the redundancy of the search suite, and interaction on the system, not from Blue-Eyes being a popular archetype and not from averaging card scores. No recorded boards exist, so the floor and median are text-only inferences. The list is illegal as built (3 copies of a Semi-Limited card), so the Final score is capped at 30 and the evaluation is structural-only.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange. Structural ≈ 55, Going First ≈ 52, Going Second ≈ 58, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 45. Modifiers: Banlist exposure (-6). Final formula: No reliable metagame: 0.80*Structural(55) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(45) = 53; context modifiers -6 gives 47; capped at 30 because the deck is Illegal (theoretical/structural-only, no normal Final score).

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.23 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Four high-ATK Extra Deck closers reachable through Blue-Eyes summons
• 11 hand-trap-text cards plus negation and removal text give layered interaction
• Broad search suite (Sage, Maiden, Wishes, Melody, Mausoleum) raises starter access

Weaknesses

• Illegal as built: Ash Blossom at 3 copies exceeds the Semi-Limited limit of 2
• No side deck, so no post-side adaptation
• Low exact-name purity (25.5%) and 14 Tuners raise brick and pilot risk
• Only 2 Blue-Eyes White Dragon for a deck built around it

Critical choke points

• Blue-Eyes White Dragon count (2) is the single starter for the Extra Deck summon route
• Searchers all depend on the Deck staying intact through early interaction

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Main 41, Extra 14, Side 0 counts (OCG size rules pass); Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring run at 3 copies vs a legal limit of 2; Card text and stats for all resolved cards; 25.5% exact-name archetype purity; 14 Tuners; 11 hand-trap-text cards
• Inferred: P(at least one Blue-Eyes White Dragon in 5) about 0.23; Searcher access about 0.81; Interaction density from text read; Midrange primary, Control secondary
• Provisional: Meta and matchup fit (D13) with no dated metagame sample or tournament link
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: the floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent 1 passcode (23995346) could not be resolved to a card and is counted as main No win-rate telemetry exists for this deck Meta Power is Provisional (null) without a dated metagame sample Title is null in the deck export