Mitsurugi Deck #772854 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG
54 Main, 15 Extra, incl. Maliss Chessy Cat x3, Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring x3, Mitsurugi Prayers x3. Created Oct 21, 2026 by YGO Mod.
Created by: YGO Mod (20517634)
Created On: 10/21/2026
Main Deck (54)
- Bystial Druiswurm x1
- Bystial Magnamhut x1
- Dotscaper x1
- Droll & Lock Bird x1
- EM:P Meowmine x2
- Maliss <P> Chessy Cat x3
- Maliss <P> Dormouse x1
- Maliss <P> March Hare x1
- Maliss <P> White Rabbit x1
- Mitsurugi no Mikoto, Aramasa x2
- Mitsurugi no Mikoto, Kusanagi x1
- Mitsurugi no Mikoto, Saji x1
- Mulcharmy Fuwalos x2
- Mulcharmy Purulia x2
- Nibiru, the Primal Being x2
- Wizard @Ignister x1
- Ame no Murakumo no Mitsurugi x2
- Futsu no Mitama no Mitsurugi x1
- Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring x3
- Backup @Ignister x2
- Allure of Darkness x2
- Gold Sarcophagus x1
- Harpie's Feather Duster x1
- Maliss in the Mirror x2
- Maliss in Underground x2
- Mitsurugi Magatama x1
- Mitsurugi Mirror x2
- Mitsurugi Prayers x3
- Mitsurugi Ritual x1
- Pre-Preparation of Rites x2
- Terraforming x1
- Maliss <C> GWC-06 x1
- Maliss <C> MTP-07 x1
- Maliss <C> TB-11 x1
- Mitsurugi Great Purification x2
Extra Deck (15)
- Accesscode Talker x1
- Allied Code Talker @Ignister x1
- Cyberse Contract Witch x1
- Cyberse Wicckid x1
- Firewall Dragon x1
- Firewall Dragon Darkfluid - Neo Tempest Terahertz x1
- Haggard Lizardose x1
- I:P Masquerena x1
- Linguriboh x1
- Link Disciple x1
- Maliss <Q> Hearts Crypter x1
- Maliss <Q> Red Ransom x1
- S:P Little Knight x1
- Transcode Talker x1
- W:P Fancy Ball x1
Couldn't load the deck
Deck — Deck Power Evaluation
Final Contextual Deck Power: 36/100 (Confidence: Low)
- Primary strategy: Midrange
- Secondary strategies: Combo, Toolbox
- Format: ocg
Legality
Main 54 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 4 violation(s).
Identity & game plan
- Win condition: Ritual-summon Reptile boss monsters (Ame no Murakumo no Mitsurugi 3200 ATK, Futsu no Mitama no Mitsurugi) and Link beatsticks from the Extra Deck; Maliss Link monsters (Red Ransom, Hearts Crypter) and Cyberse/Ignister Link pressure
- Turn 1 (going first): Search a Mitsurugi or Ritual card with Mitsurugi Prayers, Pre-Preparation of Rites or Mikoto monsters, then Ritual Summon via Mitsurugi Ritual or Mirror; Ash Blossom protects the line (Inferred from card text, no combo data)
- Turn 2 (going second): Hold Ash Blossom, Droll & Lock Bird, Nibiru and Mitsurugi Great Purification as hand and trap interaction, then rebuild a board through Maliss Link Summons (Inferred)
- Recovery: Recover from the GY through Mikoto and Maliss GY-banish effects and Mitsurugi Ritual recursion (Inferred from card text)
- After siding: No side deck is registered (Side Deck size 0), so there is no post-side plan
Why it scores here
The score comes from how the system is built, not from its individual cards and not from the Mitsurugi archetype's popularity. Searcher density (20 searcher-text cards) and a 0.82 probability that at least one core-archetype card is among the opening five give the deck a reasonably reliable first-turn start, but that start depends on a two-card bootstrap that is not verified. Interaction is the strongest area: six hand traps and nine negation-text cards provide layered answers, and Ame no Murakumo no Mitsurugi plus the Link beatsticks give real closing pressure. Against that, the deck splits across three sub-archetype engines (Mitsurugi, Maliss and @Ignister/Code Talker, with only 23% exact-name purity), which weakens combo conversion and raises brick risk, and no recorded boards exist to confirm a floor or median. The list is illegal in OCG (four cards over their copy limits), so this is a theoretical, structural-only read capped low, and no side deck is registered. Popularity in the archetype's usage stats was not counted as strength.
Dimension scores
| # | Dimension | Score | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Engine Accessibility & Consistency | 55 | P(at least one of 15 core cards in opening 5) = 0.82; searcher-text group P = 0.91; two-card bootstrap unverified (Inferred) |
| D2 | Opening-Hand Quality & Brick Management | 48 | Proxy brick rate of about 0.18 from the core group; 19 singletons and several off-plan Maliss traps lower hand quality (Inferred) |
| D3 | Combo Conversion & Ceiling | 40 | No parseable boards (total combos 0); ceiling is text-only from Murakumo, Mitsurugi Ritual and Mirror (Inferred) |
| D4 | Combo Floor & Median Output | 45 | No median power index available; floor is unknown and is not reported as average (Inferred) |
| D5 | Interruption Resilience & Route Redundancy | 55 | Multiple searchers and independent lines (Prayers, Pre-Preparation, Maliss MTP-07, Chessy Cat) give some redundancy (Inferred) |
| D6 | Resource Economy, Recovery & Grind | 50 | GY-to-hand recursion through Mikoto, Saji and Maliss banish effects; resource costs are high (Inferred) |
| D7 | End-Board & Interaction Quality | 62 | Six hand traps and nine negation-text cards with removal such as Harpie's Feather Duster; layering is good (Inferred from text flags) |
| D8 | Going-Second & Board-Breaking Power | 50 | Murakumo destroy-all and Ash/Droll answers help against a board, but going-second split is unavailable (Inferred) |
| D9 | Offensive Pressure & Closing Power | 60 | Ame no Murakumo 3200 ATK, Firewall Dragon Darkfluid 3000 ATK, Maliss Hearts Crypter 2500 ATK (Verified stats, Inferred closing) |
| D10 | Main Deck Efficiency & Flexibility | 45 | 54 main cards across 35 distinct names with 19 singletons; exact-name archetype purity is only 23.2% (Verified count, Inferred coherence) |
| D11 | Extra Deck Efficiency & Coverage | 58 | All 15 Extra Deck slots are Link monsters with mixed fodder requirements across three sub-archetypes (Verified composition, Inferred use) |
| D12 | Side Deck Adaptability | 10 | No side deck registered (Side Deck size 0); no post-side evidence (Provisional) |
| D13 | Matchup Coverage & Format Fit | 25 | No tournament link or dated meta sample; the list is illegal in OCG as built (Provisional) |
| D14 | Pilotability & Error Tolerance | 40 | Multi-step Ritual and Link sequencing across three archetypes is demanding to pilot (Inferred) |
How the score was computed
Strategy profile: Midrange primary, Combo secondary (about 80/20 by ratio of profile emphasis). Modifiers: none.
Couldn't load the combos
