Azamina Deck #772756 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 20/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox, Blind-Second/OTK, Fusion/Synchro
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 54 / Extra 18 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 4 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Synchro and Fusion boards led by Diabellstar the Black Witch, Diabellze the Original Sinkeeper and Azamina Moa Regina, with Saint Azamina as a late-game wall and threat; Snake-Eye Doomed Dragon and Chaos Angel as Extra Deck beaters once the board is established
• Turn 1 (going first): Open Elzette, Silvy or Mulcharmy to search White Forest or Azamina pieces, then convert into a Fusion or Synchro summon. The text supports this, but no recorded boards confirm it
• Turn 2 (going second): Hand traps (Ash Blossom, Ghost Ogre, Infinite Impermanence, Effect Veiler, Droll & Lock Bird) answer the first opposing starter, then the deck rebuilds through Sinful Spoils and Diabell recursion
• Recovery: Send Sinful Spoils and Diabell Spell/Trap cards to the GY and recycle them through WANTED, Deception of the Sinful Spoils, Curse of Diabell and Filia Diabell
• After siding: No Side Deck is registered (Side Deck size 0), so there is no post-side plan. Best-of-3 play is unsupported by this list

Why it scores here

This list is Illegal (three copy-limit violations and an Extra Deck of 18 against a maximum of 15), so it receives no normal Final Contextual score. The structural read is theoretical only, and the reported score is capped at 20. Structurally it has a real engine: 10 core White Forest / Diabell / Azamina cards give roughly 66% chance of at least one in a 5-card opener, and 16 searcher-text cards give about 84%. Interaction is dense, with 16 hand traps and 19 removal-text cards, so it can answer a first starter on the draw. The score comes from the system: engine access, interaction density and recursion, not from averaging card power. Archetype popularity (core present 6/8) and the card pool did not earn points by themselves. Consistency is held back by only 6.9% exact-name Azamina purity, 67 off-archetype copies, 20 singletons and a Main Deck spread across Sinful Spoils, White Forest and Mulcharmy. No recorded combos, guides or tournament data exist, so floor, median and ceiling are text-only inferences.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 50, Going First ≈ 52, Going Second ≈ 56, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 42. Modifiers: Banlist exposure (-4); Extra Deck over limit (-3); No side deck (-2); Engine conflicts (-2). Final formula: Illegal cap applied. Unrounded 0.80*Structural(50) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(42) = 48, capped to 20 for an Illegal list. Meta Power is null (provisional). Result is theoretical/structural-only.

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.66 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Core engine cards (10 copies of White Forest / Diabell / Azamina) have about 66% chance of appearing in a 5-card opener
• 16 hand traps and 19 removal-text cards give dense interaction for going second
• Recursion through Sinful Spoils, WANTED and Diabell Spells/Traps refills resources after disruption
• Extra Deck carries strong closers (Diabellstar, Snake-Eye Doomed Dragon, Chaos Angel, Saint Azamina)

Weaknesses

• Illegal list: 3 copy-limit violations and Extra Deck 18 > 15
• Low exact-name archetype purity (6.9%) and 67 off-archetype copies make the engine incoherent
• No Side Deck
• 20 singletons across 32 distinct Main cards raise the brick and garnet risk

Critical choke points

• WANTED: Seeker of Sinful Spoils at 3 copies (legal limit 1) and Ash Blossom at 3 (legal limit 2) must be cut before the list can be played
• Opening-hand access to the core engine (about 66%) leaves roughly a one-third chance of no core starter

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality: 3 copy-limit violations and Extra Deck 18 > 15; Main Deck 54 and Side Deck 0; Banlist tokens: WANTED Limited, S:P Little Knight Limited, Droll & Lock Bird Limited, Ash Blossom Semi-Limited, Foolish Burial Goods Semi-Limited; Exact-name archetype purity 6.9%
• Inferred: Opening access to core engine about 0.66 (hypergeometric); Searcher access about 0.84 and hand-trap access on going second about 0.89; Interaction density from text read; Recursion and resource economy from card text
• Provisional: Meta Power and matchup fit (no dated metagame sample); Floor and median output (no recorded combos)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent No win-rate telemetry exists in YGOVN for going-first, going-second, matchup, brick or OTK rates Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied No guides attached for this archetype No Side Deck registered