Spright Deck #772706 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 65/100 (±7 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Stun, Toolbox, Link Summon chain
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 14 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Link-summon chain from Live☆Twin Ki-sikil and Lil-la into Evil★Twin links, closing with Evil★Twin's Trouble Sunny (3300 ATK, Link-4) or Accesscode Talker (2300 ATK, Link-4); Spright Level-2 engine (Spright Blue, Jet, Red, Carrot) into Gigantic Spright or Downerd Magician xyz lines
• Turn 1 (going first): T1 Spright Starter or Live☆Twin Ki-sikil/Lil-la special summon, search via Secret Password or Sunny's Snitch, Level-2 link or xyz extension
• Turn 2 (going second): Hold Ash Blossom, Infinite Impermanence, Maxx C, Spright Red/Carrot as hand traps against the opponent's first Summon or activation, then rebuild the Live☆Twin chain on the following turn
• Recovery: Recurse Lil-la Sweet and Lil-la Treat from the GY, Evil★Twin Challenge re-summons from the GY, and rebuild via Live☆Twin Home or Spright Blue search
• After siding: No side deck is registered in the export, so there is no post-side plan to evaluate; the deck has no sideboarding cards to adjust

Why it scores here

The deck's score comes from how the system behaves: a 40-card Live☆Twin and Spright Level-2 engine with 11 searcher effects, 6 hand traps and 9 interaction-text cards, feeding a Link-heavy extra deck that reaches 3300 ATK Link-4 boards. Opening access is good but not guaranteed: the six unconditional Ki-sikil and Lil-la starters give about a 58 percent chance of at least one in an opening 5, and searchers raise practical access to roughly 0.8 to 0.9 (Inferred). Interaction is the strongest pillar, with Ash Blossom, Infinite Impermanence, Maxx C and Carrot or Red covering the first opposing action on both turns. Floor and median output cannot be measured because no recorded boards exist, so that dimension stays neutral at 50 and Provisional. Popularity was not credited: the archetype core is only partly present (7 of 16 by the usage stats), and no card scores were averaged into the deck score.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 66, Going First ≈ 70, Going Second ≈ 65, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 59. Modifiers: banlist exposure (-2); engine compactness (2). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers (Meta provisional, no dated sample)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.58 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Interaction density: 6 hand traps and 12 negation-text cards, with Ash and Impermanence at 2 and 3 copies
• Consistent Level-2 shell lets the Live☆Twin, Spright and Evil★Twin engines chain into Link-4 closers
• Searcher density (11) and GY recursion give resilience across turns
• Compact 40-card main deck within size rules, with a clean legal copy count

Weaknesses

• No side deck, so there is no best-of-3 adjustment
• Only 6 unconditional starters; opening-hand access depends on searchers
• Several 1-copy tech cards (Duster, Crossout, Droplet, Double Cross, Evil★Twin Challenge) can become dead draws
• Low exact-name archetype purity (24 percent), so the deck relies on cross-family support cards

Critical choke points

• Live☆Twin Ki-sikil or Lil-la must be in hand or reachable by a searcher to start the chain
• Evil★Twin link summons depend on Ki-sikil and Lil-la being on the field and not in the GY

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legal status: 40 main, 14 extra, 0 side, copy limits respected (Limited cards at 1, Semi-Limited Ash at 2); Copy histogram: 8 cards at 3 copies, 2 at 2, 12 at 1; Extra-deck breakdown: 11 Link, 3 Xyz; Usage stats: 7 of 16 archetype core cards present (43.8 percent)
• Inferred: P(at least one starter in opening 5) = 0.58 for the unconditional starter group; Going-second hand-trap access P = 0.65 from the evidence pack; Interaction density from negation and hand-trap text flags; Engine compactness and Level-2 coherence; Link-4 closer reach from text reads
• Provisional: Median combo output (no recorded boards); Meta power and format fit (no dated sample, no tournament link); Post-side plan (no side deck)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied, so combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link, so archetype meta-share and pilot match record are absent No win-rate telemetry; going-first and going-second splits are Inferred No side deck registered, so post-side adaptability cannot be scored from data Usage-stat inconsistency: Gigantic Spright (Xyz) and S:P Little Knight appear in the Extra Deck list at 1 copy each but usage statistics marks them in this deck false, so the core-present count (7 of 16) may be understated; with those two counted it would be 9 of 16 Title is null and resolved_by is not stated in the provenance block