Lunalight Deck #772540 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 30/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Midrange, Toolbox
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 55 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 5 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Fusion Summon Lunalight Dancers (Sabre, Liger, Leo, Panther) from the Extra Deck via Polymerization and Lunalight Fusion-style searches, then attack through the boards with 2-3 attacks.; Link and Xyz pressure (Knightmare Phoenix, Knightmare Unicorn, Accesscode Talker, Brotherhood of the Fire Fist - Tiger King) if the Fusion line is blanked.
• Turn 1 (going first): Opening search chain through Lunalight Gold Leo, Black Sheep, Kaleido Chick and Luna Light Perfume into a Fusion Summon of a Dancer. Needs at least one Lunalight starter in hand, which the hypergeometric estimate puts near 0.99 for a 5-card hand.
• Turn 2 (going second): Six-card hand with a hand trap (Ash Blossom, Infinite Impermanence, Nibiru, Forbidden Droplet) to blank the opponent's first interaction, then the same Fusion line. The hand-trap group reaches about 0.68 at six cards.
• Recovery: Lunalight monsters recur from the GY (Yellow Marten, Silver Hound, Black Sheep), and Lunalight Tiger and Wolf provide Pendulum-based rebuilds.
• After siding: Not evaluable: the deck runs no side deck (side_count 0), so there is no post-side plan to score.

Why it scores here

This OCG Lunalight list has a strong engine on paper: 31 exact-name Lunalight copies and 21 searcher-text cards put a Lunalight starter in the opening five cards about 99% of the time (Inferred, hypergeometric). Its closing power is high, with Sabre, Liger, Leo and Panther Dancers at 2800 to 3800 ATK. The score is held down by structure rather than power: 39 of 70 copies are off-archetype (44.3% exact-name purity), the deck runs no side deck, and it carries illegal copies. Because the list is Illegal, it receives a structural-only read capped at 30 and not a normal contextual score. No combo boards, guides or tournament data exist, so the ceiling and floor are text-based inference, and the archetype's usage popularity earned no points on its own. Card scores were not averaged; the system was scored on consistency, interaction and closing power together.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 60, Going First ≈ 60, Going Second ≈ 50, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 45. Modifiers: banlist_exposure (-8); no_side_deck (-4). Final formula: Illegal cap: min(0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers, 30); no normal contextual score is awarded to an Illegal list (0.80*60 + 0.20*45 - 12 = 45 before cap)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.99 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.01 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dense searcher and starter density for the Lunalight core (31 exact-name copies, 21 searcher-text cards)
• Strong Fusion closers: Sabre, Liger, Leo and Panther Dancers
• Nine hand traps plus Raigeki, Harpie's Feather Duster, Lightning Storm and Solemn Judgment cover both going-first and going-second interaction

Weaknesses

• Illegal list: two cards over the Semi-Limited limit and three Forbidden cards
• Low archetype purity (44.3%) with Mulcharmy, Fire Formation and Knightmare lines competing for slots
• No side deck, so no best-of-3 adaptation

Critical choke points

• Single-card-type starter reliance on Polymerization and Lunalight Fusion-style searches to reach the Dancers
• Forbidden Number 41 and Number 60 occupy Extra Deck slots, so Fusion/Xyz coverage is thinner than it looks

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality status Illegal with 5 violations (3 Forbidden, 2 over Semi-Limited limit); Main 55 and Extra 15 are within the OCG size rules; side_count 0; Hypergeometric draw odds (hand 5 and hand 6) match the card counts; Card text and ATK/DEF values for Lunalight Dancers and key spells
• Inferred: Consistency and starter-access estimates (D1, D2); Combo ceiling and floor from text only (D3, D4); Interaction and going-second read (D7, D8); Pilotability and resilience estimates (D5, D14)
• Provisional: Matchup and format fit (D13), no tournament link or dated meta sample; Meta Power is null
• Data gaps: No combos supplied (combos_evidence.total_combos = 0): combo floor, median and ceiling are text-based inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent No win-rate telemetry for this deck No guides attached (guides_evidence.total_guides = 0) usage_statistics in_this_deck flags conflict with the card list for Lunalight Sabre Dancer, Leo Dancer, Panther Dancer, Perfume Dancer and Liger Dancer (flagged not in deck but present in cards), so usage-based core coverage is unreliable No side deck to evaluate post-side performance (D12 scored from absence) Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied