Snake-Eyes Deck #772485 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 48/100 (±8 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Toolbox
• Secondary strategies: Midrange, Stun
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 55 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Synchro and Fusion boss monsters (Diabellze, Junora, Centur-Ion Legatia, Draco Berserker, Chaos Emperor Envoy, Black Luster Soldier) backed by Diabell and White Forest support spells; Direct damage and Chain Energy tax pressure, with Saint Azamina as a 4000 DEF wall
• Turn 1 (going first): Open a searcher (Elzette, Silvy, Toy Soldier, Tales of the White Forest, Filia Diabell) to reach a Synchro or Fusion boss, while holding Infinite Impermanence or Mystical Space Typhoon for the opponent's first interaction
• Turn 2 (going second): Hold hand traps (Skull Meister, Artifact Lancea, Infinite Impermanence) to answer the opponent's first board, then rebuild with searchers and Synchro bosses from the Extra Deck
• Recovery: Recover through graveyard-based Synchro effects (Astellar, Elzette, Rciela, Filia Diabell banish) and Toy Box or Toy Tank recursion to rebuild a board after interaction
• After siding: Not available: the deck runs zero Side Deck cards, so there is no post-side plan.

Why it scores here

The deck is scored as a connected system, not as an average of its card scores. Searchers give it a reasonable chance to reach a live starter (P(at least one of 14 searcher-text cards in an opening 5) is about 0.78, Inferred), and its 8 hand traps and 14 negation-text cards give it real interruption and interaction density. Its Synchro and Fusion bosses are strong closers, which lifts offensive and endboard scores. The score is held back by a fragmented engine: the 55-card main spans White Forest, Toy, Diabell, Azamina, Sinful Spoils and Chaos with 0% exact-name Snake-Eyes purity, and 16 cards are singletons. The deck has no combo evidence and no side deck, so median output and post-side adaptability could not be credited. Popularity of the Snake-Eyes archetype was not counted as power, and most of the archetype's standard core cards are absent.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Toolbox (D13 dropped and re-normalised to 95; meta-neutral). Structural ≈ 54.8, Going First ≈ 58, Going Second ≈ 62, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 48. Modifiers: engine conflicts (-3); no side deck (-2). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers (Meta provisional; Structural re-normalised without D13)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ — · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dense interaction: 8 hand traps and 19 removal-text cards across Main Deck
• Searcher density (14) gives a high chance of a live opening hand
• Strong Extra Deck closers at 2500 to 3500 ATK
• Recursion through Toy Box, Toy Tank and Filia Diabell regenerates resources

Weaknesses

• Fragmented engines with 0% exact-name Snake-Eyes purity
• Six of seven standard Snake-Eyes core cards absent (14.3% core present per usage stats)
• 16 singleton main cards lower consistency
• No side deck, so no post-side plan
• Chain Energy taxes both players and hurts the deck's own summons

Critical choke points

• Single hand-trap or negation answer from the opponent when the deck has no board yet
• Synchro boss access depends on a Tuner plus non-Tuner board, which the searchers have to build

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Main Deck 55 cards, Extra Deck 15 cards, Side Deck 0 cards (within OCG size rules); All distinct cards Unlimited under the OCG BanList; no copy-limit violations; 0% exact-name Snake-Eyes purity; largest sub-archetype White Forest 18 copies; Usage stats: 14.3% of Snake-Eyes core cards present
• Inferred: Searcher access P(at least one in opening 5) ≈ 0.78; Hand-trap access P(at least one in opening 6) ≈ 0.63; Brick and consistency assessment from singleton count and dead-without-board cards; Interaction density scored from card text (not measured in play)
• Provisional: Meta Power (null, no dated metagame sample); Matchup and format fit (no tournament data)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent No win-rate telemetry for going-first, going-second, matchup or brick rate Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied Deck has no title (deck_name null) Deck has zero Side Deck cards, so no post-side evidence