Crimson Dragon Deck #772483 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 50/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox, Control
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 55 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Synchro and Fusion boards (Diabellze the White Witch, Diabell Queen of the White Forest, Saint Azamina, Centur-Ion Legatia, Draco Berserker) closing through 2500-4000 stat bosses (Inferred); Chaos Emperor Dragon Envoy of the End and Black Luster Soldier Envoy as single-copy main-deck bosses (Inferred)
• Turn 1 (going first): Open a White Forest or Toy starter (3-copy Elzette, Astellar, Silvy, Toy Soldier), search or Special Summon a Synchro/Fusion route, and hold Infinite Impermanence or Magic Cylinder for the first threat (Inferred)
• Turn 2 (going second): Use 8 hand traps and Skull Meister/Infinite Impermanence to negate the opponent's first play, then rebuild a board through Synchro and Fusion extenders (Inferred)
• Recovery: Recover through GY effects of Synchro monsters, Toy and White Forest recursion, and searchers that refill the hand from the Deck (Inferred)
• After siding: Not evaluable: the list has 0 Side Deck cards, so no post-side plan exists

Why it scores here

The deck opens a functional plan reasonably often: the 14 searcher-text cards give about a 78% chance of at least one searcher in a 5-card opening hand, and the 3-copy starters (Elzette, Astellar, Silvy, Toy Soldier) provide redundant openers (Inferred). Its interaction is the strongest part of the system: 8 hand traps, 14 negation-text cards and 19 removal-text cards cover both turns, so it can contest a first play and then convert with Synchro and Fusion bosses such as Diabellze, Saint Azamina and Centur-Ion Legatia. Conversion and median output cannot be measured because no recorded boards exist, so the ceiling and floor are text-only inferences and are kept separate. The deck is an off-archetype build: 0 exact Crimson Dragon copies, 70 off-archetype copies across White Forest, Toy, Diabell and Azamina, and 17 of 18 core cards missing, so the score comes from the system's consistency and interaction and not from the popularity of the archetype label or from averaging card scores. The list has no Side Deck and no tournament or meta data, which lowers both adaptability and confidence.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange. Structural ≈ 55, Going First ≈ 50, Going Second ≈ 58, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 45. Modifiers: engine conflicts (-3). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional); 0.80*55 + 0.20*45 = 53, then modifiers -3 = 50

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.78 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dense interaction: 8 hand traps, 14 negation-text cards and 19 removal-text cards
• Redundant searchers (78% chance of at least one in a 5-card opening hand)
• Strong synchro and fusion closers with 2500-4000 stat bodies

Weaknesses

• No Side Deck, so no post-side adaptation
• Off-archetype build: 0 exact Crimson Dragon copies and 17 of 18 core cards absent
• Engine conflicts between several sub-archetypes
• Chain Energy and Deck Devastation Virus are awkward in a board-driven deck

Critical choke points

• Single-copy Extra Deck bosses (Diabellze, Saint Azamina, Centur-Ion Legatia) need specific material routes
• Hand traps must be drawn; a hand without one makes the second-turn plan fragile

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality status Legal with 55 Main, 15 Extra and 0 Side cards; 0 Side Deck cards; 0 exact Crimson Dragon copies; 17 of 18 core usage cards absent
• Inferred: Midrange and Toolbox classification from interaction and searcher density; Hypergeometric consistency estimates for starters and hand traps; Ceiling and median read from card text only
• Provisional: Meta Power (no dated metagame sample); Matchup fit (no tournament or meta-share data)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied, so floor, median and ceiling are text-only inferences No tournament link, so archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record are absent No win-rate telemetry; going-first and going-second performance is Inferred Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied Deck title is null