Lunalight Deck #772460 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 42/100 (±10 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Midrange, Stun
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 54 / Extra 17 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 2 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Fusion Summon a Lunalight Fusion boss (Leo Dancer, Sabre Dancer, Panther Dancer, Liger Dancer) through Polymerization / Lunalight Fusion, supported by Lunalight searchers and the Fusion Monster's own recursion; Fiendsmith Link and Fusion lines (Desirae, Agnumday, Sequence) via Fiendsmith's Tract, reusing the Fiend-Light Fiendsmith Engraver
• Turn 1 (going first): Opening Lunalight searchers and Gold Leo / Black Sheep / Masquerade to reach Polymerization or Lunalight Fusion, then Fusion Summon a boss while Ash Blossom and Ghost Belle hold up protection
• Turn 2 (going second): Use the 9 hand traps (Ash Blossom, Ghost Ogre, Ghost Belle, Droll and Lock Bird, Infinite Impermanence) to break the opponent's first combo, then rebuild a Fusion boss from the GY and banished Lunalight monsters
• Recovery: Recur Lunalight monsters from GY and banishment with Perfume Dancer, Yellow Marten, Emerald Bird and Silver Hound, then re-fuse from the Extra Deck
• After siding: Not evaluable: the deck has no Side Deck, so there is no post-side plan

Why it scores here

This list is Illegal in OCG as built: Fiendsmith Engraver is run at 2 copies against a limit of 1, and the Extra Deck holds 17 cards against a maximum of 15. The rubric caps an Illegal deck, so the 42 is a theoretical structural read, not a normal final score. Structurally the deck reliably opens its engine: 28 copies of the Lunalight core give about a 98% chance of at least one core card in a 5-card opening hand (Inferred), and 19 searcher-text cards give about 90% (Inferred). Its disruption suite (9 hand traps and 11 negation-text cards) gives it real going-second and interaction value. The score does not come from Lunalight being a popular archetype, and it is not an average of individual card scores. Heat Wave and Mask of Restrict conflict with the Effect Monster and Tribute engine, and there is no combo data, so floor, median and ceiling are Inferred from card text alone.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo 100% (Midrange secondary used for context only). Structural ≈ 57.1, Going First ≈ 58, Going Second ≈ 62, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 40. Modifiers: Illegal list (size and copy limits) (-6); Banlist exposure (-3); Engine conflicts (-3). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers (Meta provisional; Illegal cap applied via -12 modifiers): 0.80*57.1 + 0.20*40 - 12 = 41.7 -> 42

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.98 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dense Lunalight searcher suite (19 searcher-text cards) gives high starter access (Inferred)
• Nine hand traps plus negation text give layered going-second interaction (Inferred)
• Fusion bosses in the Extra Deck have strong ATK and protection text (Inferred)

Weaknesses

• Illegal as listed: Engraver over copy limit and Extra Deck over 15 (Verified)
• Off-archetype and tech cards dilute the engine: purity 40.8% (Verified)
• No side deck, so no post-side adaptability (Verified)
• No combo, tournament or win-rate data, so output and meta cannot be measured (Verified gap)

Critical choke points

• Polymerization or Lunalight Fusion access in hand or GY, since most boss lines depend on it (Inferred)
• Ash Blossom and Ghost Belle protection, since one successful negate can stop the whole turn (Inferred)

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Illegal status: Engraver 2 copies vs limit 1; Extra Deck 17 vs max 15; Banlist statuses for Limited and Semi-Limited cards in the list; No Side Deck present; Deck is Lunalight-core with 40.8% exact-name purity
• Inferred: Core open probability ≈ 0.98 and searcher ≈ 0.90 from hypergeometric estimates; Interaction density from hand-trap and negation card text; Going-second hand-trap coverage ≈ 0.68; Fusion boss ceiling from card text
• Provisional: Meta power is null; no dated metagame sample; Matchup and format fit (D13) = 50 with no tournament data; Median output (D4) without recorded boards
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot record absent No win-rate telemetry (going-first/second, matchup, brick and starter rates) Meta Power is provisional without a dated metagame sample Deck has no title and no Side Deck