Tearlaments Deck #772456 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG
58 Main, 17 Extra, incl. Aluber the Jester of Despia x3, Fallen of Albaz x3, Mulcharmy Fuwalos x3. Created Oct 21, 2026 by YGO Mod.
Created by: YGO Mod (20517634)
Created On: 10/21/2026
Main Deck (58)
- Albion the Shrouded Dragon x2
- Aluber the Jester of Despia x3
- Bystial Magnamhut x1
- Bystial Saronir x1
- Despian Tragedy x1
- Dogmatika Maximus x1
- Droll & Lock Bird x1
- Fallen of Albaz x3
- Mulcharmy Fuwalos x3
- Ra's Disciple x1
- Springans Kitt x1
- The Bystial Lubellion x1
- Tri-Brigade Mercourier x2
- Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring x3
- Blazing Cartesia, the Virtuous x2
- Effect Veiler x2
- Guiding Quem, the Virtuous x2
- Incredible Ecclesia, the Virtuous x1
- Branded Fusion x1
- Branded in High Spirits x1
- Branded in Red x1
- Branded Lost x1
- Branded Opening x1
- Forbidden Droplet x3
- Fusion Deployment x3
- Gold Sarcophagus x1
- Nadir Servant x2
- Super Polymerization x3
- Triple Tactics Thrust x3
- Branded Banishment x1
- Branded Retribution x1
- Destructive Daruma Karma Cannon x2
- Infinite Impermanence x3
Extra Deck (17)
- Alba-Lenatus the Abyss Dragon x1
- Albion the Sanctifire Dragon x1
- Despian Proskenion x1
- Garura, Wings of Resonant Life x1
- Granguignol the Dusk Dragon x1
- Khaos Starsource Dragon x1
- Light and Darkness Dragonlord x1
- Lubellion the Searing Dragon x1
- Masquerade the Blazing Dragon x2
- Mirrorjade the Iceblade Dragon x1
- Mixousia the Confounder x1
- Mudragon of the Swamp x1
- Rindbrumm the Striking Dragon x1
- Starving Venom Fusion Dragon x1
- The Dragon that Devours the Dogma x1
- Titaniklad the Ash Dragon x1
Couldn't load the deck
Deck — Deck Power Evaluation
Final Contextual Deck Power: 34/100 (Confidence: Low)
- Primary strategy: Midrange
- Secondary strategies: Combo, Toolbox
- Format: ocg
Legality
Main 58 / Extra 17 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 3 violation(s).
Identity & game plan
- Win condition: Fallen of Albaz / Branded fusion boards (Albion the Sanctifire Dragon, Light and Darkness Dragonlord, Despian Proskenion) overwhelming the opponent's field; Despia and Bystial beatsticks recovered through the GY after Fusion Summons
- Turn 1 (going first): Open Fallen of Albaz (3 copies, P(>=1 in 5-card hand) = 0.24) or a searcher (22 searcher-text cards, P(>=1) = 0.92), then Fusion Summon through Branded Fusion, Branded in Red or Fusion Deployment
- Turn 2 (going second): Six-card hand with 9 hand traps (P(>=1 hand trap in 6) = 0.65) to stop the opponent's first engine, then rebuild a Fusion board from the GY
- Recovery: Searcher and GY-recursion text (Nadir Servant, Despian Tragedy, Branded in Red, Starving-style recursion) re-fetch a Fallen of Albaz or a Despia monster after a hand-trap exchange
- After siding: Not evaluable: the deck has 0 side-deck cards, so there is no post-side plan
Why it scores here
The deck's engine is Fallen of Albaz fusion (3 copies, about a 24% chance of at least one in an opening 5-card hand), backed by a dense searcher and recursion suite (22 searcher-text cards, about a 92% chance of at least one searcher in hand). It converts into pressure through high-ATK Fusion Monsters (Light and Darkness Dragonlord 3400, Despian Proskenion 3200, Albion the Sanctifire Dragon 3000) and survives with 9 hand traps and 18 negation-text cards, which gives it a reasonable going-second answer density. Consistency is held back by the single-copy Limited cards and by the absence of combo boards, so the floor and median are scored below the ceiling. The score is not driven by Tearlaments popularity: the list runs zero Tearlaments cards, so the archetype label does not match the list. Card scores were not averaged; the system was scored on consistency, interaction and closing power. The list is Illegal (Extra Deck 17/15, two cards over copy limit), so the score is capped at a structural-only, theoretical value.
Dimension scores
| # | Dimension | Score | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Engine Accessibility & Consistency | 45 | P(>=1 Fallen of Albaz in 5) = 0.24; P(>=1 searcher) = 0.92; many partial starters, no combo boards (Inferred) |
| D2 | Opening-Hand Quality & Brick Management | 40 | 9 hand traps and 17 single-copy cards dilute the opening hand; no brick estimate from boards (Inferred) |
| D3 | Combo Conversion & Ceiling | 45 | Ceiling read from card text only: Branded Fusion and Fusion Deployment chain into 3000+ ATK monsters; no recorded boards (Inferred) |
| D4 | Combo Floor & Median Output | 35 | combo data has 0 parseable boards, so the median is unmeasured and set conservatively (Inferred) |
| D5 | Interruption Resilience & Route Redundancy | 55 | Ash Blossom, Effect Veiler, Droll & Lock Bird and Infinite Impermanence give layered answers; recursion is text-only (Inferred) |
| D6 | Resource Economy, Recovery & Grind | 55 | 22 searcher-text cards and GY recursion keep resources flowing; no resource profile data (Inferred) |
| D7 | End-Board & Interaction Quality | 65 | 18 negation-text and 7 removal-text cards, with 9 hand traps (Inferred semantic read) |
| D8 | Going-Second & Board-Breaking Power | 55 | Hand traps and Fusion board-breakers are present, but there is no going-second win-rate data (Inferred) |
| D9 | Offensive Pressure & Closing Power | 60 | Monsters at 2500-3400 ATK with piercing and direct text; closing power is structural (Inferred) |
| D10 | Main Deck Efficiency & Flexibility | 45 | 58 main cards within the 40-60 band, but 33 distinct cards and 15 tech slots reduce coherence (Inferred) |
| D11 | Extra Deck Efficiency & Coverage | 40 | 17 Extra Deck cards exceed the 15-card limit; 16 distinct Fusion Monsters (Verified count, Inferred use) |
| D12 | Side Deck Adaptability | 15 | 0 side-deck cards; no post-side plan is possible (Verified) |
| D13 | Matchup Coverage & Format Fit | 40 | No tournament link or meta-share data; this is a provisional read (Provisional) |
| D14 | Pilotability & Error Tolerance | 50 | Multi-step fusion sequences and many hand-trap timing decisions raise the pilotage bar (Inferred) |
How the score was computed
Strategy profile: Midrange primary with Combo secondary (about 80:20 at the profile level; weights taken from the Midrange row). Modifiers: none.
Couldn't load the combos
