Dogmatika Deck #772424 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 25/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox, Midrange
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 55 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 3 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Fallen of Albaz and Fallen of the White Dragon feed Fusion Summons (Branded Fusion, Super Polymerization) into Extra Deck boss monsters such as Albion the Sanctifire Dragon, Titaniklad the Ash Dragon, and The Dragon that Devours the Dogma (text read, Inferred).; Mulcharmy draw engine and Pot of Sloth card advantage, with Dogmatika and Despia searchers, grinding the game in longer matches (Inferred).
• Turn 1 (going first): Open with Fallen of Albaz, Fallen of the White Dragon, or a searcher such as Branded Opening or Incredible Ecclesia, then convert into a Fusion Summon of a Level 8 boss (Inferred).
• Turn 2 (going second): Use Ash Blossom, Droll & Lock Bird, or The Great Gallant Bandit to interrupt the opponent, then Fusion Summon through the resulting board (Inferred).
• Recovery: Rebuild from the GY via Branded Retribution, Mirrorjade, and Tri-Brigade Mercourier's banish-based searches, and recycle Fallen-mention monsters from the GY (text read, Inferred).
• After siding: Not supported: the deck runs zero side-deck cards, so there is no post-side plan (Verified from composition).

Why it scores here

The list has a real Fusion engine: Fallen of Albaz and Fallen of the White Dragon feed Level 8 bosses, and Super Polymerization, Branded Fusion, and Branded in Red provide multiple routes to them. Its searcher text is dense (about 83% chance of at least one searcher in an opening 5 by the hypergeometric estimate), so the engine is reasonably accessible on paper. Interaction is broad (12 negation and 17 removal text cards, plus Ash Blossom, Droll & Lock Bird, and Gallant Bandit), which lifts the interaction and resilience scores. Those gains are offset by a flat median (no recorded boards), a 0-card side deck, and a pilot burden of multi-step chains, and the deck is illegal as built. Popularity and archetype share were not counted, and card scores were not averaged; the score reflects the system, and the illegal copy limits cap the final result at 25.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 55.7, Going First ≈ 56, Going Second ≈ 52, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 48. Modifiers: Illegal copy-limit violations (-8); No side deck (-4). Final formula: Illegal cap: Structural 55.7 is theoretical only. Normal Final = 0.80*55.7 + 0.20*48 - 12 modifiers = 42.2, then capped to 25 because the list breaks OCG copy limits. Meta Provisional.

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.09 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dense searcher and interaction text (16 searcher, 12 negation, 17 removal) gives many routes to a live board
• Multiple routes into Level 8 Dragon bosses through Fallen-mention Fusions
• Full, flexible Extra Deck of 13 Fusion and 2 Synchro monsters

Weaknesses

• Three cards are over the OCG copy limit, so the list is illegal as built
• Zero side-deck cards, so there is no post-side plan
• 22 singleton main-deck cards and low archetype purity (2.9%) raise brick and coherence risk
• No recorded combos, so the median output is unverified

Critical choke points

• Fallen of Albaz is a single copy and is central to the Fusion route
• Branded Fusion and Super Polymerization are each the only route to some boss monsters
• Going-second interaction depends on a few copies of Ash Blossom and Droll

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Illegal status: 3 cards run over the OCG Semi-Limited copy limit; Main 55 / Extra 15 / Side 0 counts; Extra Deck is 13 Fusion and 2 Synchro; Archetype exact-name purity is 2.9%
• Inferred: Engine accessibility from hypergeometric draw estimates; Brick risk from singleton count and situational text; Ceiling from text-level Fusion routes; Interaction density from card text role hints; Pilotability from chain complexity
• Provisional: Meta and matchup fit (no dated sample or tournament link); Median output (no recorded boards)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied, so combo floor, median, and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link, so archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record are absent No win-rate telemetry for going-first, going-second, matchup, or brick rates Meta Power is Provisional without a dated metagame sample Side deck is empty, so post-side adaptability cannot be measured