@Ignister Deck #772417 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 30/100 (±10 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Stun, Toolbox
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 57 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 2 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Link Summon Link-3 to Link-5 monsters (Maliss Red Ransom, Hearts Crypter, Accesscode Talker, Allied Code Talker not present) and push through 2300 to 2500 ATK Bystial or Link attackers; no recorded combo data to confirm the line; Bystial Druiswurm, Magnamhut and Baldrake 2500 ATK beaters backed by hand-trap and negation interaction
• Turn 1 (going first): Open Backup @Ignister, Wizard @Ignister or Mulcharmy draw engine, Normal Summon a Cyberse, then Link Summon into the Maliss or Ignister Link monsters (Inferred from card text; no recorded boards)
• Turn 2 (going second): Hold Ash Blossom, Nibiru, Droll and Ghost Ogre hand traps for the opponent's first Summon or activation, then rebuild a Link board from the Extra Deck (Inferred)
• Recovery: Rebuild through Backup @Ignister and Mulcharmy Fuwalos or Purulia draw effects plus Maliss banish-from-GY recursion (Inferred)
• After siding: No side deck is registered (side_count 0), so there is no post-side plan; the deck cannot adapt between games

Why it scores here

The deck is a multi-archetype Link list (Ignister, Maliss, Dominus, Mulcharmy, Bystial, Code Talker mixed) with 10 hand traps, 10 negation-text cards and 29 removal-text cards, so its interaction density is the clearest strength, and it can reliably find an Ignister starter in the opening hand (archetype core P of at least one about 0.86 in the main deck). Its ceiling and median cannot be measured because no combos were supplied, so combo scores are text-only inferences with low confidence. Only 5 of 57 main cards carry the exact @Ignister name (6.9 percent purity), so the engine is a patchwork of sub-archetypes whose coherence is unproven. The deck is Illegal: Ash Blossom and Dominus Impulse are each run three times against an OCG limit of two, so the score is capped at a theoretical, structural-only value. Popularity and usage-stat presence did not earn points, and no card scores were averaged into the deck score.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange 85 / Stun 15 (Inferred). Structural ≈ 53, Going First ≈ 50, Going Second ≈ 58, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 45. Modifiers: illegal_copy_limit (-15); no_side_deck (-3); hybrid_archetype_purity (-3). Final formula: Illegal cap: 0.80*Structural(53) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(45) = 51 normal blend, capped to 30 as theoretical/structural-only per Illegal rule; Meta provisional

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.86 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dense interaction: 10 hand traps, 10 negation-text cards, 29 removal-text cards
• Multiple independent negations (Ash Blossom, Dominus Impulse) and recursion routes
• Access to 2500 ATK Bystial and 2300 ATK Link attackers from Extra Deck

Weaknesses

• Illegal as listed: Ash Blossom and Dominus Impulse over the OCG copy limit
• Low exact-archetype purity (6.9 percent), so the engine is split across sub-archetypes
• No side deck registered

Critical choke points

• Backup @Ignister (3 copies) as the main Ignister starter; a bad hand without it leans on sub-archetype draws
• Single-card Link summon routes from Extra Deck; no alternate board if Link monsters are negated

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Main 57, Extra 15, Side 0 with OCG size range 40-60 and 0-15 respected; Ash Blossom and Dominus Impulse each run 3 copies against a legal limit of 2; Deck is Illegal per the legality block; Extra Deck contains 14 distinct Link monsters per the cards list
• Inferred: Starter access about 0.86 for the archetype core in the main deck; Interaction density and hand-trap coverage; Going-second hand-trap coverage about 0.70; Brick and dead-draw risk from narrow 1-copy staples
• Provisional: Meta Power and matchup fit (no dated metagame); Archetype meta share (no tournament link)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied; combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link; archetype meta share and per-pilot record absent No win-rate telemetry; all matchup and brick rates are Inferred Usage statistics in_this_deck flags appear to check the main deck only: Extra Deck cards that are listed in cards (for example Allied Code Talker, Cyberse Wicckid, Accesscode Talker, Linguriboh, S:P Little Knight) show in_this_deck false, so missing_core (core_present_pct 48) overstates the gap Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied