Tenpai Dragon Deck #772354 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

40 Main, 15 Extra, incl. Mulcharmy Fuwalos x3, Mulcharmy Purulia x3, Tenpai Dragon Paidra x3. Created Oct 21, 2026 by YGO Mod.

Deck Tenpai Dragon OCG

Created by: YGO Mod (20517634)

Created On: 10/21/2026

 
 


Official AI Deck Power Analysis
MidrangeConfidence: LowEvaluated Oct 21, 2026
30± 10/ 100
Power Score
Structural 52
Reliability 40
Going First 46
Going Second 58

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 30/100 (±10 · Confidence: Low)

Overall score Value
Structural Deck Power 52
Going First 46
Going Second 58
Meta Power provisional
Tournament Reliability 40
  • Primary strategy: Midrange
  • Secondary strategies: Stun
  • Format: ocg

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 2 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

  • Win condition: Synchro Summon 3000-ATK boss monsters (Sangenpai Transcendent Dragion, Angelechy Shatranga, Angelechy Bastion, Assault Blackwing - Kusanagi) from a 14-Synchro Extra Deck and convert field presence into attacks; Angelechy Field Spell column pressure and banish-based removal from Synchro monsters
  • Turn 1 (going first): Open with a Tenpai Dragon Paidra or Terraforming search, Normal Summon into a Synchro chain (Genroku or Chundra as Tuner), and use Angelechy Opening to e4 when the opponent goes first
  • Turn 2 (going second): Hold Ash Blossom, Ghost Belle, Ghost Ogre and Infinite Impermanence for the opponent's first Special Summon or activation, then rebuild through Mulcharmy draws and the Sangen/Tenpai searchers
  • Recovery: Recover by Special Summoning Tenpai Dragon monsters from the GY (Fadra, Genroku) and drawing through Mulcharmy Fuwalos and Purulia when the board is empty
  • After siding: No Side Deck is registered, so no post-side plan can be evaluated; the deck cannot legally side cards in a best-of-3 as built

Why it scores here

The deck reliably opens a functional starter in most hands: the archetype core has a 0.96 chance of at least one copy in a 5-card opening hand, and the searcher text group (Paidra, Sangen Summoning, Terraforming, Kaimen) has a 0.78 chance of at least one hit, so engine access is good (Inferred). Its interaction package is large, with 10 hand traps and 10 negation-text cards, which gives it a real going-second plan, since the hand-trap group has an 0.85 chance of at least one card in a 6-card hand. Conversion is the weak point: there are no parseable recorded boards, no combo evidence, and no median output data, so floor and ceiling are text-only estimates. The deck's exact-name purity is only 12.7%, because it splits its engine across Tenpai Dragon, Angelechy, Mulcharmy, Sangen, Dominus and Bystial, which raises the risk of conflicting routes. The score is capped because two cards exceed their copy limits (Ash Blossom and Dominus Impulse each run 3 copies against a limit of 2), and the score was not derived by averaging card scores. Popularity and archetype usage did not earn points; the usage data only confirms the core cards are real and accessible.

Dimension scores

# Dimension Score Evidence
D1 Engine Accessibility & Consistency 62 P(>=1 Paidra/searcher-text card in opening 5) ≈ 0.78 for the searcher group; archetype core P(>=1 in hand5) ≈ 0.96 (Inferred)
D2 Opening-Hand Quality & Brick Management 50 8 tuners and 13 level-0/3 non-engine cards give a moderate brick risk; no full-brick data, copy histogram 9/5/7 (Inferred)
D3 Combo Conversion & Ceiling 55 No parseable boards; ceiling inferred from text: Sangenpai Transcendent Dragion, Angelechy Shatranga and Bastion as 3000-ATK boss monsters (Inferred)
D4 Combo Floor & Median Output 40 No combo evidence, so median output cannot be measured and is estimated low-moderate (Provisional)
D5 Interruption Resilience & Route Redundancy 60 10 hand traps plus Angelechy Endgame Problem and Sangen Summoning give multiple independent interruption answers (Inferred)
D6 Resource Economy, Recovery & Grind 55 Searchers (Paidra x3, Sangen Summoning, Kaimen, Terraforming) and Mulcharmy draw effects recover card economy (Inferred)
D7 End-Board & Interaction Quality 60 10 negation-text cards, Kuibelt and Angelechy Castellan removal text and Angelechy Endgame Problem give layered interaction (Inferred semantic read)
D8 Going-Second & Board-Breaking Power 62 Hand traps Ash, Ghost Belle, Ghost Ogre, Droll and Infinite Impermanence favor going second; hand-trap group P(>=1 in hand6) ≈ 0.85 (Inferred)
D9 Offensive Pressure & Closing Power 60 Four 3000-ATK Synchro bosses in the Extra Deck give closing power, but Synchro access is conditional on the engine (Inferred)
D10 Main Deck Efficiency & Flexibility 45 21 distinct Main Deck cards in 40 slots with seven 3-copy cards and two over-limit cards; compactness is middling (Verified composition)
D11 Extra Deck Efficiency & Coverage 50 14 Synchro and 1 Link in the 15-card Extra Deck with 12 distinct cards; the slots are used well but spread across several sub-archetypes (Verified composition)
D12 Side Deck Adaptability 15 No Side Deck cards are registered (Side Deck size 0), so no post-side adaptability can be assessed (Verified)
D13 Matchup Coverage & Format Fit 40 No tournament link or dated metagame sample; archetype meta-share is absent, so this is Provisional
D14 Pilotability & Error Tolerance 35 Many Quick-Effect hand traps and multi-archetype sequencing require tight timing decisions and error management (Inferred)

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange weights applied; Stun secondary noted but not blended because the deck is Illegal and capped. Structural ≈ 52, Going First ≈ 46, Going Second ≈ 58, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 40. Modifiers: banlist and copy-limit exposure (-8); engine conflicts across sub-archetypes (-4). Final formula: Structural 52 (Midrange profile); unmodified 0.80*52 + 0.20*40 - 12 = 38; Illegal deck capped to 30 (theoretical / structural-only). Meta Power provisional (null).

Probability & combo summary

  • Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.34 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
  • Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
  • Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

  • Engine access: archetype core P(>=1 in hand5) ≈ 0.96 and searcher group ≈ 0.78 (Inferred)
  • Interaction density: 10 hand traps and 10 negation-text cards give going-second resilience (Inferred)
  • Four 3000-ATK Synchro bosses provide closing power (Inferred)

Weaknesses

  • Illegal as built: two cards exceed copy limits
  • No Side Deck, so no post-side plan and no best-of-3 adaptability
  • Low exact-name purity (12.7%) and split engines across six sub-archetypes
  • No combo or median-output evidence to confirm conversion

Critical choke points

  • Synchro summon access: the Extra Deck boss monsters need Tuners and non-Tuners, so a Tuner shortage stops conversion
  • Angelechy Field Spell and column placement for the Angelechy engine
  • Searcher access to Tenpai Dragon Paidra (3 copies) for the Sangen and Tenpai engine
Priority Remove Add Reason
1 One copy each of Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring and Dominus Impulse Tech or hand-trap cards that are legal at 1 copy, such as a second Infinite Impermanence or a non-Semi-Limited negation trap Brings the deck back to legal copy limits, which is the precondition for any normal Final Contextual score
2 One Mulcharmy copy or one Angelechy support card A Side Deck of 15 cards covering the most-played boards A 0-card Side Deck removes all post-side adaptability (D12)
3 A sub-archetype-only card with low support (e.g., Hieratic Seal's niche role) A consistent engine card for one primary archetype (Angelechy or Tenpai Dragon) Raises exact-name purity and reduces engine conflicts

Evidence & confidence

  • Verified: Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 counts, copy histogram 9/5/7, and archetype spread from the evidence pack; Ash Blossom and Dominus Impulse each run 3 copies against a Semi-Limited limit of 2; Limited cards (Bystial Magnamhut, Droll & Lock Bird, Sangen Kaimen, Sangen Summoning, Tenpai Dragon Chundra, Terraforming) each run 1 copy, which is legal
  • Inferred: Opening-hand engine access from the hypergeometric estimates (0.96 core, 0.78 searcher, 0.85 hand-trap group); Interaction quality and going-second plan from card text; Closing power from Synchro boss ATK values
  • Provisional: Meta Power (null, no dated metagame sample); Format fit (no tournament link or archetype meta-share)
  • Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record are absent No win-rate telemetry: going-first and going-second splits are Inferred only Meta Power is Provisional without a dated metagame sample Side Deck is empty, so post-side performance cannot be assessed

More OCG Info

Tenpai Dragon

Tenpai Dragon Breakdown

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 
https://metaduelist.com/
Top