Qliphort Deck #772322 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 36/100 (±8 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Toolbox
• Secondary strategies: Midrange, Stun
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 56 / Extra 14 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 3 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Extra Deck boards (Link/Xyz/Fusion) built from a mixed Cyber Dragon, Cyberdark, K9, Mulcharmy and Bystial toolbox; no single engine is established.; Bystial 2500-ATK beaters and Nibiru as going-second swing threats.
• Turn 1 (going first): Open on a Cyber Dragon / Cyberdark searcher line, then use hand traps (Ash Blossom, Infinite Impermanence, Ghost Ogre) to protect the first board.
• Turn 2 (going second): Hold hand traps and Droll & Lock Bird against the opponent's first summon, then convert with Bystial, Nibiru or a Link/Xyz board.
• Recovery: Searchers (Cyberdark Realm, Clockwork Night, Chaotic Elements) and Mulcharmy draw effects refill the hand after interaction.
• After siding: No Side Deck is registered, so no post-side plan can be evaluated.

Why it scores here

The deck is scored as a system, not as an average of its cards. Its core engines (Cyber Dragon, Cyberdark, K9, Mulcharmy) are reachable on a T1 or T2 starter with roughly 0.89 probability from the 19-copy archetype core group (Inferred), and 14 hand traps plus Ash Blossom give strong disruption coverage on the going-second turn. The lack of recorded boards means the combo ceiling and median output are text-only inferences and are scored low for that reason. Popularity and archetype usage did not earn points, and the deck is capped because two Semi-Limited cards are over the copy limit, so this is a structural read only. No Side Deck means post-side adaptability earns almost nothing.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: 0.8 Toolbox / 0.2 Midrange (conceptual; Toolbox weights used for Structural). Structural ≈ 51, Going First ≈ 48, Going Second ≈ 55, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 35. Modifiers: Illegal copy-limit violation cap (-12). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional) + ContextModifiers; Illegal cap applied

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.89 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Broad hand-trap and negation coverage (14 hand traps, multiple Ash Blossom effects)
• Strong searcher density (21 searcher-text cards) for consistency
• Extra Deck covers Link, Xyz, Fusion and Synchro summons

Weaknesses

• Two cards exceed the OCG copy limit, so the list is illegal as built
• Mixed sub-archetypes with 0 exact Qliphort copies weaken engine focus
• No Side Deck

Critical choke points

• Single unresolved passcode in the Main Deck must be identified before any real evaluation
• Over-limit Ash Blossom and Izuna must be cut to 2 copies

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Two Semi-Limited copy-limit violations; Main 56 / Extra 14 within OCG size rules; No Side Deck registered; One Main Deck passcode unresolved
• Observed: Usage stats show the archetype core is present in the list
• Inferred: Starter access ≈ 0.89 from the hypergeometric model; Hand-trap and negation coverage quality from card text; Going-second strength from hand-trap density
• Provisional: Meta-share and format fit (no dated metagame sample); Combo floor and median (no recorded boards)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied; combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link; archetype meta-share and per-pilot record absent One Main Deck passcode (10443957) could not be resolved to a card No win-rate telemetry; going-first and going-second splits are Inferred Meta Power is Provisional without a dated metagame sample No Side Deck registered