Speedroid Deck #772291 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 35/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Toolbox
• Secondary strategies: Combo, Stun
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 48 / Extra 14 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 2 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Extra Deck pressure from Link/Fusion/Xyz finishers (Cyber Dragon Sieger, Chimeratech Rampage/Fortress/Megafleet Dragon, Therion King Regulus, Cyber Dragon Nova), reached through Cyber Dragon and Cyberdark searchers.; R.B. link chain and K9 Xyz pressure, both sub-engines that the list only partially supports.
• Turn 1 (going first): Normal Summon a searcher (Cyber Dragon Core, Terrortop, Cyberdark Realm) to add a Cyber Dragon or Cyber engine piece, then extend through Link/Fusion materials. The T1 board is thin and depends on drawing searchers.
• Turn 2 (going second): Use Ash Blossom, Droll & Lock Bird, or Forbidden Droplet to answer the opponent's first board, then rebuild through Cyber Dragon Nachster and Cyber Dragon Herz recursion.
• Recovery: Recursion from the GY through Cyber Dragon Nachster, Cyber Dragon Herz and Cyberdark Claw, plus searcher re-draws from Cyberdark Realm and Cyber Emergency.
• After siding: Not evaluable. The deck has no side deck (Side Deck size 0), so there is no post-side plan.

Why it scores here

The list is illegal (two cards run 3 copies against an OCG limit of 2), so it receives a capped score and is evaluated as a structural read only. Its searcher density (20 searcher-text cards; about 94% chance of at least one in a 5-card opening) and the archetype-core presence (about 75% of openings contain a core card) give it a real opening engine. The deck spreads across Cyber Dragon, Cyberdark, R.B., K9 and Roid, with only 5 of 17 usage-core cards present and 0% exact-name Speedroid purity, so the engine is a loose toolbox rather than a coherent system. Interaction (four hand traps, eleven negation texts, eleven removal texts) and Extra Deck finishers support its going-second plan, but there are no recorded boards, no side deck and no tournament data, so every ceiling and median claim stays Inferred. The score comes from the system's consistency, interaction and cohesion. It does not come from the popularity of the Speedroid label or from averaging card scores.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Toolbox. Structural ≈ 50, Going First ≈ 46, Going Second ≈ 54, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 40. Modifiers: copy_limit_violation (-10); no Side Deck (-3). Final formula: Illegal deck: capped. Base 0.80*Structural(50) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(40) = 48; modifiers total -13 → 35 (Meta provisional).

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.75 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.25 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dense searcher and recursion text gives a high chance of a live opening engine.
• Four hand traps and eleven negation texts provide interaction for going second.
• Extra Deck finishers (Sieger, Regulus, Nova, Chimeratech) give real closing power.

Weaknesses

• Illegal copy counts on two cards.
• Four engines (Cyber Dragon, Cyberdark, R.B., K9) with 0% exact-name purity; pieces conflict across sub-archetypes.
• No side deck, so no best-of-3 adaptation.
• Low core presence (5 of 17 usage-core cards).

Critical choke points

• Reliance on a single searcher-led opening with no recorded alternative line.
• Ash Blossom and K9-17 Izuna are both over the copy limit; the list cannot be played as built.

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Illegal status: Ash Blossom and K9-17 Izuna each run 3 copies against an OCG limit of 2.; Main 48 / Extra 14 / Side 0 counts from legality.; Archetype purity 0% exact-name; 62 off-archetype copies.
• Observed: No recorded boards (combo data total 0).
• Inferred: Searcher opening probability ≈ 0.94 and core-group opening probability ≈ 0.75 (hypergeometric).; Toolbox-profile dimension scores D1–D14.; Hand-trap going-second hit ≈ 0.42.
• Provisional: Meta Power (null) and matchup fit D13 until a dated metagame sample exists.
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference. No tournament link: archetype meta-share and pilot match record absent. One passcode (10443957) in CardIDList could not be resolved and was counted as main. No win-rate telemetry (going-first/second, matchup, brick/starter rates). Meta Power provisional without a dated metagame sample.