Constellar Deck #772026 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 62/100 (±7 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Midrange
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Xyz boss (Delteros, Caduceus, Ptolemy, Draco Future) built from Constellar/Tellarknight Level 4 monsters and Stellarnova Bonds / Caduceus recursion; Gagaga/Dododo/Onomat Xyz and Level-based boards that feed the Extra Deck
• Turn 1 (going first): Onomatopaira or Dododo/Mulcharmy-based searches into Constellar Castor and Tellarknight Altairan, then a Level 4 Xyz Summon; hold Ash or Impermanence for the first response
• Turn 2 (going second): Droll & Lock Bird, Maxx "C", Ash Blossom and Ghost Ogre to break the opponent's first board, then a Xyz Summon from Stellarnova Bonds or Caduceus
• Recovery: Caduceus and Sombre recover Constellar cards from the GY; Ash and Impermanence protect the engine; Dominus Purge answers Trap-based searches
• After siding: No side deck is run, so there is no post-side plan; the list cannot adjust between games

Why it scores here

The deck reliably reaches its engine: 22 core Constellar/Tellarknight cards give a near-certain core hit in a 5-card opening hand (about 0.99), and 15 searchers give about 0.92 for at least one searcher in hand. Converting that access into pressure depends on the Xyz Extra Deck, which contains several 2500-3000 ATK bosses with recursion and ways to continue from the GY. Interaction is dense (7 hand traps, plus Dominus Purge, Crossout Designator and Ghost Ogre), which supports both going-first protection and going-second disruption. Scoring is based on the deck as a system: consistency, conversion and interaction, not on an average of card scores. The deck's popularity is not counted, and there is no combo, guide, tournament or meta data, so the ceiling and floor are text-based inferences. The score is capped by the lack of a side deck, the Xyz dependence and the thin pilot-error tolerance.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 67, Going First ≈ 68, Going Second ≈ 66, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 58. Modifiers: banlist exposure (-1); Extra Deck dependence (-2). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional) + ContextModifiers = 0.80*67 + 0.20*58 - 3 ≈ 62

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.99 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Core access is almost guaranteed (about 0.99 for at least one core card in a 5-card hand)
• Dense interaction: 7 hand traps and several negate/destroy effects
• Strong Xyz bosses in the Extra Deck with recursion options

Weaknesses

• No side deck, so no post-side adaptation
• Heavy reliance on a small set of Xyz finishers
• Multi-engine conflicts (Dododo, Gagaga, Constellar) can reduce the odds that a hand is functional

Critical choke points

• Caduceus / Stellarnova Bonds as the main Extra Deck route
• Ash and Impermanence to protect the first Xyz Summon

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legal under OCG BanList; 40 main / 15 extra / 0 side; Limited cards at legal copy counts (1 each); Card stats and text read from the card table
• Inferred: Opening-hand starter probability (0.987 core, 0.919 searcher); Interaction density and resilience from card text; Going-first and going-second plan quality
• Provisional: Meta / format fit (no tournament or meta sample)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and pilot record absent No win-rate telemetry for going-first, going-second, matchup or brick rates Meta Power is provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied