Lunalight Deck #771897 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 35/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Midrange, Toolbox, Fusion
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 57 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 1 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Fusion Summon Lunalight Dancers (Liger Dancer 3800 ATK, Leo Dancer 3500 ATK) off Lunalight searcher chains, then close with double attacks.; Xyz (Outer Entity Nyarla, Brotherhood of the Fire Fist - Tiger King) and Link (S:P Little Knight, I:P Masquerena) extensions when Fusion lines are blanked.
• Turn 1 (going first): Gold Leo / Black Sheep / Masquerade search a Lunalight monster or Polymerization, then Lunalight Fusion or Polymerization into a Dancer.
• Turn 2 (going second): Hold Ash Blossom, Nibiru, Droll & Lock Bird, Evenly Matched or Dominus Impulse to stop the opponent, then rebuild through Lunalight Tiger, Perfume and GY recursion into a Dancer.
• Recovery: Luna Light Perfume and Lunalight Perfume Dancer recur Lunalight monsters from the GY; Lunalight Yellow Marten and Emerald Bird refill the hand.
• After siding: None: the deck runs 0 side cards, so there is no post-side plan.

Why it scores here

The deck reliably opens its engine: 98% of 30 archetype-core copies appear in at least one 5-card opening hand (Inferred hypergeometric), and 17 searcher-text cards add redundancy, so a Lunalight monster is usually live by turn 2. Its conversion ceiling comes from the Dancer Fusion line, but the Liger Dancer and Sabre Dancer, both in the core, are absent or thin, and no recorded boards exist, so combo floor and median are text-only inference. Interaction is layered across 10 hand traps and 5 spell/trap negations or removals, which gives it a fair going-second profile, but it has no side deck, so post-side adaptability and matchup fit score low or stay provisional. The score comes from the system (engine redundancy, interaction density, and closing power on the Fusion Dancers) rather than from Lunalight's popularity or from averaging card scores, and the Ash Blossom copy-limit violation caps the final result as a theoretical, structural-only read.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 62.5, Going First ≈ 64, Going Second ≈ 63, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 55. Modifiers: Illegal copy-limit violation (-12). Final formula: Raw = 0.80*Structural(62.5) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(55) + Modifiers(-12) = 49; Illegal cap applied, final = min(35, raw) = 35. Meta Power provisional (null).

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.98 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.02 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Engine is accessible: 3 copies each of Gold Leo, Black Sheep and Masquerade, with 17 searcher-text cards
• Layered interaction: 10 hand traps plus Skill Drain, Dominus Impulse and Harpie's Feather Duster
• High closing power from Liger and Leo Dancers, which can make double attacks

Weaknesses

• Illegal list: Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring at 3 copies exceeds the OCG limit of 2
• No side deck, so no post-side adaptability
• No recorded boards, so combo floor and median are unverified

Critical choke points

• Lunalight Fusion and Polymerization access to the Dancer line; losing both to a hand trap or Skill Drain leaves only search-based recovery
• Ash Blossom copy count: the list is illegal until one copy is removed

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Main 57 / Extra 15 / Side 0 are within the OCG size rules; Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring copy count 3 exceeds the legal limit of 2 (Illegal); Archetype-core inclusion (usage stats) and copy counts
• Observed: Usage statistics show Lunalight core cards at 60-100% inclusion across archetype decks
• Inferred: Opening-hand accessibility estimates (98% core presence in hand of 5; 70% hand trap in going-second hand of 6); Interaction quality read from card text; Brick and redundancy estimates from composition
• Provisional: Meta Power (no dated metagame sample); Matchup and format fit (no tournament link)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record are absent No win-rate telemetry exists for going-first, going-second, matchup, brick or OTK rates Meta Power is Provisional without a dated metagame sample Deck title is null, and no guides are attached