Supreme King Deck #771828 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 32/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 52 / Extra 13 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 1 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Extra Deck boss monsters (Supreme King Z-ARC, Odd-Eyes and Dragon Fusion/Xyz/Synchro/Link bosses) reached through Pendulum Summons; Pendulum-zone scale plays and Magician/Odd-Eyes searcher chains into a single large Extra Deck summon
• Turn 1 (going first): Set Pendulum scales with Gate Magician / Horoscope / Astrograph searchers, then Pendulum Summon into a boss; no combo boards are recorded, so this is structural only (Inferred)
• Turn 2 (going second): Hold Ash Blossom, Droll & Lock Bird and Infinite Impermanence for the opponent's first search or summon, then rebuild from the remaining hand (Inferred)
• Recovery: Searchers (27 cards with searcher text) and Odd-Eyes GY recursion are the main rebuild routes; no recorded recovery lines exist (Inferred)
• After siding: Not evaluable: side_count is 0, so there is no post-side plan

Why it scores here

The deck is scored as a system, not as an average of its cards. It has a strong searcher density (27 cards with searcher text, so P(at least one searcher in a 5-card opener) is about 0.98) and a deep Extra Deck with several boss options, which together make the opening plan reliable on paper. Interaction is layered: 5 hand traps, 22 negation-text cards and Disablaster, plus Z-ARC's own effect, cover a turn-one-to-turn-two window and make going second workable. The deck is held back by weak archetype coherence: only 7.7% of cards share the exact 'Supreme King' name, and the core Odd-Eyes and Magician lines are split across several sub-archetypes; its Extra Deck core is also only 45.5% present against usage stats. Popularity did not earn points, and there are no combo boards, tournament results or side deck, so the Illegal status (three Ash Blossoms against a Semi-Limited limit of two) caps the final score and makes this a structural-only read.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange profile used; Toolbox secondary noted but not blended into the weights (no meta data to justify blending). Structural ≈ 47, Going First ≈ 45, Going Second ≈ 50, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 35. Modifiers: Illegal copy-limit violation (-8); No side deck (-4). Final formula: No reliable metagame: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers (Meta provisional); Illegal status applies the cap via modifiers. 0.80*46.8 + 0.20*35 = 44.4, then -12 = 32

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.98 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• 27 searcher-text cards give a high chance of a playable opening hand
• Layered interaction: 5 hand traps, 22 negation-text cards and Disablaster/Z-ARC effects
• Deep Extra Deck with several boss options across fusion, synchro, xyz and link

Weaknesses

• Illegal copy-limit violation (Ash Blossom x3 vs limit 2)
• Very low exact archetype purity (7.7%) and split sub-archetype coherence
• No side deck, no combo boards and no tournament data

Critical choke points

• Pendulum scale setup: most Pendulum monsters need specific scales to be played
• Z-ARC is a single copy, so the boss route has no redundancy

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Main count 52 and Extra count 13 are within OCG size rules; Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring is run 3 times against a legal limit of 2 (Illegal); Exact-name archetype purity is 7.7%; Usage core present is 5 of 11 (45.5%); Side deck is empty
• Inferred: Searcher density gives near-certain access to a starter (P ≈ 0.98); Going-second hand-trap coverage is about 47% in a 6-card hand; Structural score of 47 from the Midrange profile
• Provisional: Meta Power and matchup fit (no dated metagame sample)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot record absent No win-rate telemetry for going-first/second, matchup, or brick/starter rates No side deck, so post-side adaptability is unmeasured Meta Power is provisional without a dated metagame sample