Lunalight Deck #771782 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 63/100 (±6 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Midrange, Stun
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Fusion Summon a Lunalight Dancer (Leo, Liger, Sabre or Panther; 2800 to 3800 ATK, second attack) using Polymerization or Lunalight Fusion.; Xyz and Link follow-ups (Brotherhood of the Fire Fist - Tiger King, Outer Entity Nyarla, I:P Masquerena) and Lunalight Cat Dancer pressure.
• Turn 1 (going first): Open a Gold Leo, Masquerade or Black Sheep starter, search Polymerization or Lunalight Fusion, then Fusion Summon a Lunalight Dancer on turn 1 or 2.
• Turn 2 (going second): Keep a hand-trap line (Ash Blossom, Ghost Belle, Effect Veiler, Impermanence, Droll) to disrupt the opponent's first engine, then Fusion Summon on turn 2.
• Recovery: Foolish Burial and Foolish Burial Goods fill the GY for recursion; Kaleido Chick, Black Sheep and Yellow Marten return Lunalight monsters, and Perfume Dancer or Luna Light Perfume re-summons.
• After siding: None: the list has an empty Side Deck (side 0 of 15 allowed in OCG), so there is no post-side plan.

Why it scores here

The deck reliably opens a Lunalight starter: about 74% of 5-card openings (going first) hit at least one of the nine Gold Leo, Masquerade or Tenki copies, rising to about 81% on a 6-card hand going second, and Polymerization access is redundant across Black Sheep, Masquerade, Kaleido Chick and Perfume. Its conversion is strong on the system: several Lunalight Dancers reach 2800 to 3800 ATK and gain a second attack, and the Extra Deck supplies Xyz and Link backups. Interaction is dense, with ten hand traps and Serenade Dance, which lifts the floor and the going-second plan. Weaknesses are a 55 brick-management score (many Level 0 spells), a 45 pilotability score (long Fusion and chain sequences), and no side deck at all, so post-side adaptation scores near zero. Popularity and archetype share were not credited, and card scores were not averaged: the score comes from consistency, median output and interaction, and combo evidence is absent, so the ceiling and median are inferred from text.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 66, Going First ≈ 67, Going Second ≈ 66, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 58. Modifiers: No side deck (-2); Limited key tools (-1); Redundant starters (2). Final formula: No reliable metagame: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers; Structural is meta-neutral (D13 dropped, weights renormalized over 97): 6382/97 = 65.8 -> 66; 0.80*66 + 0.20*58 = 64.4; modifiers -1 -> 63

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.74 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Redundant openers: 3x Gold Leo, 3x Masquerade, 3x Tenki plus Black Sheep, Kaleido Chick and Marten
• Dense hand-trap interaction (10 hand traps, Serenade Dance) that improves going second (about 84% to hold one hand trap in 6 cards, Inferred)
• Strong closing: Leo, Liger, Sabre and Panther Dancers with second attacks and untargetable/unaffected clauses (text-based)
• Multiple Polymerization sources (Polymerization, Lunalight Fusion, Heavy Polymerization, Black Sheep, Masquerade)

Weaknesses

• No side deck: no post-side plan (side 0 of 15)
• Level 0 spell and trap density (17 cards) risks dead cards in some hands
• Long Fusion and chain sequences lower pilotability
• No combo or tournament data to confirm median output or matchup fit

Critical choke points

• Polymerization / Lunalight Fusion access: only one Polymerization and one Lunalight Fusion are printed; the other sources are searchers
• Gold Leo as the Level 4 searcher: removing it breaks several openers

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legal: 40 main, 15 extra, 0 side; no size or copy-limit violations; Limited: Droll & Lock Bird, Foolish Burial, S:P Little Knight at 1 copy each; Semi-Limited: Ash Blossom and Foolish Burial Goods at 2 copies each; Extra Deck: 10 Fusion, 3 Xyz, 2 Link; 11 distinct; Usage statistics: 29 rows, archetype core present for 16 of 25 by flag, but Extra Deck flags are inconsistent (see probabilities.notes)
• Inferred: Hypergeometric starter access: 0.742 (5-card) and 0.808 (6-card) for the 9 Gold Leo/Masquerade/Tenki copies; Dancer ceiling and closing power from card text; Hand-trap disruption value on the going-second hand (0.845 for at least one in 6 cards); Brick rate and pilotability from Level 0 spell density and chain requirements
• Provisional: Matchup and format fit (D13), dropped from the Structural score as meta-neutral; Meta power: null, no dated metagame sample
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot record absent No win-rate telemetry for this deck (going first/second, matchup, brick rate) Empty Side Deck: post-side plan cannot be evaluated usage statistics Extra Deck flags (in this deck/copies_in_deck) disagree with the card list; missing core cards is not used Deck title is null; the name in the output is null