Tri-Brigade Deck #771760 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 32/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Midrange
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 51 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 2 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Fallen of Albaz-based Fusion and Synchro lines into Albaz Dragon boss monsters (e.g. The Dragon that Devours the Dogma, 3000 ATK), per card text (Inferred); Fusion/Synchro boss beats protected by Solemn and hand-trap interaction (Inferred)
• Turn 1 (going first): Open a Fallen of the White Dragon (2 copies) or Fallen of Albaz (1 copy) plus a Branded or Despia starter, then Fusion Summon into an Albaz boss (Inferred from card text; no combo boards supplied)
• Turn 2 (going second): Use hand traps (6 copies) and Solemn interaction on the opponent's first summon, then rebuild through Extra Deck Fusion lines (Inferred)
• Recovery: Searchers (15 text-tagged) and Dogmatika/Branded recursion from GY (Inferred from card text)
• After siding: No side deck is registered (Side Deck size 0), so no post-side plan can be evaluated

Why it scores here

This list is Illegal: The Fallen & The Virtuous and Super Polymerization are each run 3 times against a Semi-Limited limit of 2, so the score is a capped theoretical read and not a normal Final Contextual score. The engine opens reasonably on hypergeometric estimates (about 0.27 for a 3-copy card and 0.19 for a 2-copy starter in the opening 5), and the Extra Deck gives access to several Albaz Dragon bosses. Interaction is the strongest area, with 6 hand traps, 13 negation-text cards and Solemn protection. The list has no recorded combo boards, no side deck and no tournament data, so consistency and conversion are inferred, not observed. Archetype purity is 1.5 percent: the deck is labeled Tri-Brigade but is built on a Fallen of Albaz, Branded and Dogmatika cluster, and the score reflects that system as a whole rather than an average of card scores or the archetype's popularity.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 45, Going First ≈ 45, Going Second ≈ 40, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 38. Modifiers: banlist exposure (-8); archetype incoherence (-4). Final formula: Illegal list: theoretical cap. 0.80*Structural(45) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(38) = 43.8, then modifiers -12 = 32 (Meta provisional)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.19 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Layered interaction: 6 hand traps, 13 negation-text cards and 3 Solemn traps
• Extra Deck gives access to several 3000-ATK Albaz boss monsters
• Searcher density (15 text-tagged cards) supports consistent access to key pieces

Weaknesses

• Illegal list: 2 Semi-Limited cards over the copy limit (3 vs 2)
• Low archetype purity (1.5 percent) and a label that does not match the engine
• No side deck, so no post-side adaptability
• No recorded combo boards, median or tournament data

Critical choke points

• Fallen of Albaz (1 copy) and the Albaz Fusion boss lines depend on a single engine card
• Branded Fusion, Branded Opening and Branded in High Spirits are each Limited (1 copy), so losing one removes a key route

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Main deck 51 cards, Extra Deck 15 cards, Side deck 0 cards; The Fallen & The Virtuous and Super Polymerization are each over the Semi-Limited copy limit (3 run vs 2 allowed); Limited cards Branded Fusion, Branded Opening, Branded in High Spirits, Droll & Lock Bird, Gold Sarcophagus and Solemn Judgment each run 1 copy (legal); Archetype purity 1.5 percent; 65 off-archetype copies
• Inferred: Opening-hand starter probabilities (hypergeometric); Engine route, going-first and going-second plans, and boss-monster conversion, from card text; Interaction density from negation and hand-trap text counts
• Provisional: Meta Power (no dated metagame sample); Matchup and format-fit scores (D13)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent No win-rate telemetry (going-first/second, matchup, brick and starter rates) No side deck registered, so post-side performance cannot be assessed Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied Deck title is null