Cyberdark Deck #771691 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 30/100 (±12 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Toolbox
• Secondary strategies: Midrange, Fusion/Synchro/Xyz/Link
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 56 / Extra 14 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 1 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Extra Deck boards from Chimeratech Rampage/Fortress/Megafleet Dragon, Cyber Dragon Nova, and Super Starslayer TY-PHON (text-based read, Inferred); Chaos Angel, Divine Arsenal AA-ZEUS, and Jizukiru as high-ATK finishers reached through Power Bond or Fusion (Inferred)
• Turn 1 (going first): Search with Cyber Emergency/Cyberdark Realm/Cybernetic Horizon, then Normal Summon Cyber Dragon Core or Cyberdark Claw into Fusion/Link lines (Inferred from card text)
• Turn 2 (going second): Hold Ash Blossom, Droll & Lock Bird, Solemn Strike/Judgment, and Harpie's Feather Duster for the opponent's first big play, then rebuild through searchers (Inferred)
• Recovery: Cyber Repair Plant and Clockwork Knight recursion plus Cyberdark Claw GY recovery (Inferred from card text)
• After siding: Not evaluable: the deck runs no side deck (side_count 0)

Why it scores here

The deck reliably opens a searcher line: 21 searcher-text cards with P(at least one in a 5-card opening hand) of about 0.92, and about 0.89 for at least one archetype-core card (Inferred from hypergeometric estimates). Its interaction suite is dense, with 14 negation-text cards, 4 hand traps and 3 Ash Blossom copies, and that density drives the endboard-interaction score. The Extra Deck gives it a wide closing range through Chimeratech, Chaos Angel, Divine Arsenal and Super Starslayer, but the deck is split across Cyber Dragon, Cyberdark, Mulcharmy and Solemn sub-archetypes (exact-name purity 11.4%), which lowers engine coherence and raises brick risk. There are no recorded boards, no tournament link and no side deck, so floor, median and recovery are text-based inferences, not measured output. The list is over the copy limit for Ash Blossom, so it is capped at 30 and treated as theoretical and structural only. The score comes from consistency, interaction and closing power on the system, not from the archetype's popularity and not from averaging card scores.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Toolbox primary, Midrange secondary (about 80/20 disclosed as a judgment). Structural ≈ 50, Going First ≈ 55, Going Second ≈ 58, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 42. Modifiers: banlist_exposure (-4); engine_conflicts (-2); unresolved_card (-2). Final formula: No reliable metagame: 0.80*Structural(50) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(42) = 48.4; modifiers -8 gives 40.4; capped at 30 because the deck is Illegal (theoretical and structural only)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.89 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.11 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dense searcher text (21 cards) gives a high chance of a live opening hand
• Layered interaction: 14 negation-text cards, 4 hand traps, 3 Ash Blossom, Solemn and Droll
• Wide Extra Deck closing range from Chimeratech, Chaos Angel, Divine Arsenal and Super Starslayer

Weaknesses

• Illegal: Ash Blossom is run 3 times against a limit of 2
• Low engine coherence: exact-name purity 11.4% across four sub-archetypes
• No side deck, so no post-side plan
• Mulcharmy copies are conditional and dead when the field is occupied

Critical choke points

• Mulcharmy board-empty condition
• Power Bond and Chimeratech need specific Extra Deck and Fusion Material sets
• Single Droll & Lock Bird and Harpie's Feather Duster for backrow and draw control

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Main 56, Extra 14, Side 0, all within size_rules; Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring: 3 copies vs 2 legal (Semi-Limited); Limited cards Droll & Lock Bird, Harpie's Feather Duster, S:P Little Knight and Solemn Judgment each run 1 copy (legal); Exact-name purity 11.4%; 62 off-archetype copies; Hypergeometric odds: archetype-core ≈ 0.886, searcher ≈ 0.915
• Inferred: Toolbox/Midrange strategy classification from composition and card text; Engine, brick and recovery read from text and probabilities; Interaction density and closing-power estimates from card text
• Provisional: Meta power (null; no dated metagame sample); Matchup fit and tournament reliability (no tournament link)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference (combos_evidence.total_combos = 0) No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot record are absent One main-deck passcode (10443957) could not be resolved to a card and was counted as main Usage-statistics flags conflict with the card list: Cyber Dragon Nova, Chimeratech Fortress Dragon and Chimeratech Megafleet Dragon are present in the Extra Deck but marked in_this_deck:false in missing_core, so inclusion-based core analysis is unreliable No win-rate telemetry exists (going-first, going-second, matchup, brick and OTK rates) Meta Power is provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied Deck has no side deck, so D12 cannot be measured beyond its absence