Magician Girls Deck #771571 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 34/100 (±10 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox, Mechanic: Fusion/Link/Synchro
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 3 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Fusion/Link/Synchro boards built off Dark Magician and Magician-support searches (Dark Magician of Destruction, W:P Fancy Ball, Chaos Angel, Ecclesia and the Dark Dragon as the Extra Deck payoffs); Link and Synchro pressure from I:P Masquerena, Accesscode Talker and Selene; Ritual Illusion of Chaos line as a backup
• Turn 1 (going first): Normal Summon Magician's Rod or Mulcharmy Fuwalos, search a Dark Magician-support card, and convert into a Fusion or Link through Preparation of Rites / The Gaze of Timaeus (Inferred, no combo data)
• Turn 2 (going second): Hold Ash Blossom, Ghost Ogre & Snow Rabbit, Maxx C, Effect Veiler and Infinite Impermanence to answer the opponent's first board, then rebuild through Dark Magical Curtain or Soul Servant (Inferred)
• Recovery: Mulcharmy Fuwalos and Dark Magician of Destruction recur monsters from the GY when the first line is answered; Preparation of Rites recovers a Ritual Spell (Inferred from card text)
• After siding: Not evaluable: the deck runs no side deck (Side Deck size 0), so there is no post-side plan

Why it scores here

This OCG Magician Girls list is Illegal: three Forbidden cards (Red-Eyes Dark Dragoon x2, Charmer Quartet in Bloom, Albion the Branded Dragon) are over the copy limit, so it receives a capped, structural-only score rather than a normal final read. Within the structure, the searcher density (12 cards, about 85% chance of at least one in an opening 5) and ten hand traps give the engine a reasonable chance of going live, which is why the consistency dimensions sit in the middle range. Combo conversion and median output are scored from text alone because no recorded boards exist, so both are held near 40. The deck has no side deck, which caps adaptability low. Popularity is not a factor: the archetype core is present at 3 of 5 usage-listed cards, and no points were earned from it. No card scores were averaged into the deck score; the cap comes from legality and the system-level read.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Balanced (default; primary strategy Combo is inferred but no recorded boards support a Combo weight profile). Structural ≈ 48, Going First ≈ 50, Going Second ≈ 45, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 40. Modifiers: banlist exposure (-12). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers (Meta provisional): 0.80*48 + 0.20*40 = 46.4, minus 12 banlist-exposure modifier = 34 (illegal list, structural-only cap applied)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.85 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dense searcher and hand-trap coverage gives a reasonable chance of a live engine on either turn order
• Multiple Extra Deck closers from different Fusion, Link and Synchro lines give layered end-board options
• Negation and removal text is well represented across Main and Extra Deck

Weaknesses

• Illegal list: three Forbidden cards over the copy limit
• No side deck, so there is no post-side plan
• Archetype identity is diluted: no card in the list carries the exact Magician Girls archetype name
• No recorded boards or win-rate data, so combo conversion and median output are unverified

Critical choke points

• Any Forbidden card that is run is removed on legality grounds, which strips a Fusion or Link starter from the engine
• The Dark Magician-support search line depends on a small number of 1-copy and 2-copy searchers

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality: three Forbidden cards over the copy limit; Main 40, Extra 15 within size rules; Copy histogram: 5 cards at 1 copy, 7 at 2, 7 at 3 (Main); Searcher-text group 12 copies, hand-trap group 10 copies; Archetype-core group: 6 copies, P(at least one in opening 5) = 0.5771
• Inferred: Consistency and brick estimates from hypergeometric draws and card text; Going-first and going-second plans from card text; Interaction quality from text role tags
• Provisional: Meta Power and matchup fit: no dated metagame sample and no tournament link
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent No win-rate telemetry in YGOVN for this deck (going-first/second, matchup, brick and starter rates) Meta Power is provisional: no dated metagame sample supplied Deck title is null in the source export