Odd-Eyes Deck #771506 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 32/100 (±8 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 46 / Extra 12 / Side 0 — status: Legal with warning. 1 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Extra Deck boss monsters (Dinoster Power, Stardust Dragon, Shooting Star Dragon, Secreterion Dragon, Ignition Beast Volcannon) reached through Pendulum and Fusion routes; Performapal and Solfachord beatdown with Pendulum ATK boosts and direct-attack pressure
• Turn 1 (going first): Set Pendulum Scales with Performapal or Solfachord Pendulum monsters, search via Ladyange, Gentrude or Longphone Bull, then Pendulum Summon into a Extra Deck boss
• Turn 2 (going second): Rely on Draining Shield, Starlight Road, Performapal Show Down and Threatening Roar to slow the opponent, then find a Pendulum starter; there is no hand trap to force interaction
• Recovery: Pendulum Reborn and Performapal Teeter Totter Hopper return Pendulum monsters from the Graveyard; Pot of Riches and Pot of Avarice add card flow
• After siding: No side deck is present, so there is no post-side plan; the list cannot adjust between games

Why it scores here

The deck is a singleton Pendulum midrange list that mixes Performapal, Solfachord, Magician, Dracoslayer and Greed pieces, and it runs almost none of the Odd-Eyes core (1.7% exact-name purity, 0 of 15 usage-core cards). Its 10 searcher-text cards give about a 72.5% chance of at least one searcher in a 5-card opening hand, but each individual starter is a single copy with roughly 11% odds to appear in a going-first hand, so the engine is not reliably live on turn one or two. No recorded boards exist, so the ceiling and median are text-only inferences and are kept low for that reason. Interaction is card-text based (Draining Shield, Starlight Road, Performapal Show Down, Threatening Roar) with no hand traps, which keeps going-second scoring weak. Score is not boosted by Odd-Eyes popularity or usage stats, and card scores were not averaged into the deck result.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange primary with Toolbox secondary (disclosed; the list is a Midrange pendulum shell with toolbox singleton tech). Structural ≈ 38, Going First ≈ 40, Going Second ≈ 30, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 35. Modifiers: engine conflicts (-3); no post-side plan (-2). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers (Meta provisional): 0.80*38 + 0.20*35 - 5 = 32.4, rounded to 32

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.11 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Ten searcher-text cards give a reasonable chance of at least one search in a typical hand (Inferred)
• Four Extra Deck summon types give flexible boss options (Verified structure)
• Negation and removal text across the list gives some interaction density (Inferred from card text)

Weaknesses

• Only 1.7% of the main deck is the exact Odd-Eyes archetype and none of the 15 usage-core Odd-Eyes cards are present (Verified)
• No hand traps or floodgates, so going-second interaction is thin (Verified)
• No side deck, so the list cannot adapt between games (Verified)
• Singleton construction lowers the chance of repeating a starter (Inferred)

Critical choke points

• The Pendulum Zone needs two valid scales, so one missing Pendulum monster stalls most lines (Inferred)
• Starters are single copies, so losing one to the opponent removes the line (Inferred)
• Unresolved passcode 16178681 is counted as main and cannot be checked against the list (Verified data gap)

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legal size: 46 main, 12 extra, 0 side; within the OCG size rules; Exact-name archetype purity 1.7%; 0 of 15 usage-core cards present; All distinct cards are singletons; no card is over its copy limit; No hand traps or floodgates in the list
• Inferred: Opening-hand starter odds about 0.109 going first and about 0.725 for at least one searcher; Consistency and brick risk for a 46-card singleton Pendulum list; Going-second weakness from the lack of hand traps and the non-engine share
• Provisional: Matchup and format fit (no dated meta sample or tournament link)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied; combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link; archetype meta-share and per-pilot record absent Passcode 16178681 could not be resolved to a card and is counted as main No win-rate telemetry; going-first, going-second and matchup signals are inferred or unknown Meta Power is provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied