Lunalight Deck #771431 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 30/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Stun, Toolbox
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 55 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 3 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Fusion Summon a Lunalight Dancer (Leo Dancer 3500 ATK, Liger Dancer 3800 ATK) from the Extra Deck, enabled by Polymerization effects and Lunalight searchers; Lunalight Perfume Dancer and Sabre Dancer board pressure, plus Mulcharmy and Lunalight recursion for the late game
• Turn 1 (going first): Opening Lunalight searchers (Gold Leo, Yellow Marten, Kaleido Chick) to add Polymerization or Lunalight Fusion and reach a Fusion Summon on turn 1 or 2
• Turn 2 (going second): Six-card hand with a hand trap (Ash Blossom, Ghost Ogre, Ghost Belle, Dominus Impulse) to stop the opponent's first summon, then the same searcher-to-Fusion line
• Recovery: Graveyard recursion through Luna Light Perfume, Kaleido Chick and Serenade Dance to rebuild the Lunalight board after a disruption
• After siding: Not evaluable: the deck runs no Side Deck, so there is no post-side plan (Inferred)

Why it scores here

This structural-only read scores the list as a system. The archetype core is present (about 98% chance of at least one core card in a 5-card opening hand, Inferred) and 16 searcher-text cards give the deck reliable early engine access. Its Fusion conversion ceiling is high (Leo Dancer and Liger Dancer, with Polymerization and Lunalight Fusion as the enablers), but no recorded boards exist, so median output is only text-inferred. Seven hand traps and 11 tech cards add interaction, though three Semi-Limited cards run over their OCG copy limit and the deck has no Side Deck. Popularity and archetype usage were not credited, and card scores were not averaged. Because the list is illegal, the final score is capped at 30 and labelled theoretical.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 59, Going First ≈ 60, Going Second ≈ 55, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 40. Modifiers: Banlist exposure (-4); No side deck (-4); Off-archetype dilution (-4). Final formula: Final = 0.80*Structural(59) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(40) + Modifiers(-12) = 43, then capped to 30 because the deck is Illegal (theoretical/structural-only). Meta Power is provisional (null).

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.98 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Archetype core is very reliable to open (about 98% at least one core card in a 5-card hand, Inferred)
• 16 searcher-text cards give repeatable engine access
• Fusion ceiling is high: Liger Dancer 3800 ATK and Leo Dancer 3500 ATK
• Seven hand traps plus Dominus Impulse give layered early interaction

Weaknesses

• Illegal list: Ash Blossom, Foolish Burial Goods and Dominus Impulse each run 3 copies against an OCG limit of 2
• No Side Deck, so no best-of-3 adaptation
• Low exact-archetype purity (42.9%) and a 15-card Extra Deck spread across several Fusion lines
• Limited cards Foolish Burial and S:P Little Knight add banlist exposure

Critical choke points

• Polymerization or Lunalight Fusion access: most Dancer lines need one of these, and the deck has 4 total (Inferred)
• Ash Blossom and the hand traps being the only early interaction on the going-second turn

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Main 55, Extra 15, Side 0 vs OCG size rules (40-60 / 0-15 / 0-15); Copy-limit violations: Ash Blossom, Foolish Burial Goods, Dominus Impulse each at 3 copies vs 2 legal; Limited status of Foolish Burial and S:P Little Knight (1 copy each, legal); Archetype purity 42.9% and the archetype_spread composition; Card stats such as Liger Dancer 3800 ATK and Leo Dancer 3500 ATK
• Inferred: Opening-hand starter reliability (about 98% for the core group); Searcher-based engine access and brick risk; Going-first and going-second plan read from card text; Interaction density and resilience from hand-trap text
• Provisional: Matchup and format fit (no tournament or meta data); Meta Power (null)
• Data gaps: no combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference no tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot record are absent no win-rate telemetry for going-first, going-second, matchups or brick rate Meta Power is provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied deck title is null